Good.

--Vic

On Feb 3, 12:50*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. *

--Vic

I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50Â*pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. Â*

--Vic

I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.




After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.


Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)

On Feb 3, 2:41*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. *I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. *As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.

Daschle and the Dems are practicing the "Screw everyone else, I got
mine" principle.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.




After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.


This cracks me up.

We are not talking about forgetting to report income.
We are talking about tax evasion, pure and simple. Us mortals would go to
jail for it.

Furthermore, he apparently knew this when he accepted Obama's offer for the
position, but didn't bother telling anyone until after the nomination was
made public.

What a guy.

"Oooops. I forgot"

Eisboch

On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:29:46 -0500, HK wrote:

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.

--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.

After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.

Agreed, but the GOP never claimed they had any ethical standards.
Well, except no BJ's in the WH. But nothing restricting f**king the
American economy and people by giving Wall Street a BJ.
That was perfectly okay.
The Dems are claiming things have changed.
Putting lobbyist/taxcheat Daschle in the cabinet violates the claim.
Last thing this country needs is more limousine liberals.
I'm very happy the current administration has set a high bar for
ethics. It was refreshing to see Obama admit "I screwed up."
Per my usual rant, the problem the Dems have is being saddled with the
same globalist views they and the Reps have had for a couple decades
now.
Last year's trade deficit almost equals the proposed "stimulus" in $.
All the economists who supported the equity/housing bubbles and loss
of jobs are disgraced, but they are still influencing economic policy.
You can figure it out from there.
But temporary jobs created with more debt will *not* revive a moribund
economy which is guided by the same old globalist thinking.

--Vic

On Feb 3, 11:50*am, Vic Smith wrote:
Good. *

--Vic

NEXT!