Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?