Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:



Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.


Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

"HK" wrote in message
...


Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.



Budgeted federal spending that benefits small business is fine and healthy
to the economy.
A rewritten stimulus program that encourages more of it would go a long way
towards increased employment.
Increased employment would go a long way towards a recovery.
A recovery would go a long way towards Obama's chances for an eight year
term.

Eisboch

On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.

However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.

HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.

Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

"HK" wrote in message
...
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.

Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.




After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.


This cracks me up.

We are not talking about forgetting to report income.
We are talking about tax evasion, pure and simple. Us mortals would go to
jail for it.

Furthermore, he apparently knew this when he accepted Obama's offer for the
position, but didn't bother telling anyone until after the nomination was
made public.

What a guy.

"Oooops. I forgot"

Eisboch

Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 3:02 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:52 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:46 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:29 pm, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Feb 3, 12:50 pm, Vic Smith wrote:
Good.
--Vic
I agree. Just not a Daschle fan.
Me either. I suspect he didn't have the decency to make the move
himself, but Obama gave him the choice to withdraw or be withdrawn.
After the last eight years of GOP absolutely criminal horrors, Daschle's
lapses don't amount to a pimple on the commonweal.
We get the message loud and clear, Dems dont pay taxes, I wonder if HK
paid his.
In reality, I believe the reason is that Dems are so math challenged
that they are unable to figure out how to pay taxes. As proof, I cite
their so-called "stimulus" package which is nothing more than bribes
to cronies, typical Dem work.
Got any contracts paid for directly or indirectly by federal dollars? Be
delighted to help make sure you get no more. :)
Threats from HK, Ewww, I am terrified. Is that the best you can do
when people disagree with you HK, make threats? Sorry Harry, we are
strictly commercial right now.
However, "ethics" requires intelligence, a quality lacking among Dems
as experience this week shows.
HK has just given us all a demonstration of ethics among Dems, when he
cannot win with logic, he attempts to threaten.
HK, anything I would write would have numbers and lots of those
squiggly greek letter thingies, sure to baffle a Dem.
Just offering to help. You want to control federal spending, I want to
help you.

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".


Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".


So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?



Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".


Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

On Feb 3, 7:05 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:39 pm, Keith Nuttle wrote:



HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...

Frogwatch wrote:

Controlling federal spending involves some concepts a lot more complex
than "A pocket full of cash for my buddies".

So...you are willing to forgo any revenues in any way related to tax
dollars, right?

Jesus, Harry. He didn't say "eliminate". He said "controlling".
According to your illogic, we would also eliminate Social Security,
Medicare, Medicaid, Food Stamps and any other "Federal Spending".

Oh, I know what the righties mean by "controlling." Their sort of
controlling means plenty of money for military misadventures, for
defense contractors, et cetera. Plenty of taxbreaks for the rich and for
corporations. But tight tight control for anything that helps the
working stiff.

Any comments on how long it will be before Daschle receive a lucrative
government job that does not have to receive congressional review?

A month?

Nobody seriously expects people like HK to make sense. He belongs to
the Cult of The One and reason is therefore not expected

Harry has probably never known a "working stiff".