On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:34:50 -0500, HK wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
have in common?

"By now far too many scientists have knowingly colluded in an historic
fraud, one that would put Bernie Madoff to shame. We are seeing
political larceny here on a truly planetary scale."

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/anthrop...ud-in-history/

Facts debunk the myths:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...017272,00.html



You are sooooooo unconvincing. What I cannot figure out is what is
motivating the righties to fight so hard against ways to lessen man's
impact on the environment.

They want the earth and tax cuts to remain status quo.

They're just as stubboron about the (in)validity of both.

I just heard yesterday that Moody's did an analysis on how to
stimulate the economy.

Food stamps was the winner. Every $1.00, $1.73 was done in commerce.
Employment insurance was next with $1.64 per dollar invested. Tax
cuts for small business? Accellerated depreciation on new equipment
returned .33 for every dollar invested since it takes a long time for
business to identify and make the investments.

This doesn't account for the longer term effects, just the immediate
effect of stimulating the economy.

Naturally, food stamps aren't being considered in the stimulus bill.

I'm not defending the stimulus bill that's being considered. I think
it's a cluster ****.