| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:23:59 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote: The key to understanding this is that the past can be ignored when assessing the probability because it doesn't not matter which door the player initially picks and which door the host opens. The second key is that the host knows which door has the car. And that he never picks the car. Answered this to Eisboch. It's interesting. But only if you like thinking. --Vic |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:31:46 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:23:59 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock wrote: The key to understanding this is that the past can be ignored when assessing the probability because it doesn't not matter which door the player initially picks and which door the host opens. The second key is that the host knows which door has the car. And that he never picks the car. Answered this to Eisboch. It's interesting. But only if you like thinking. LOL!! 10-4. -- "I have tried to know absolutely nothing about a great many things, and I have succeeded fairly well." Robert Benchley |