In 6 years, Bush borrowed about $780 billion for the Iraq war. Obama
proposes to borrow a trillion dollars EACH YEAR for the forseeable
future on top of the existing budget. There is an enormous diff
tween
borrowing 780 billion over 6 years and borrowing a TRILLION MORE EACH
YEAR. I realize Libs cannot do math but at least try





On Jan 28, 11:44*am, wrote:
Salazar is talking about a "five year plan".. Sounds like an old
Creedence song..snerk

Five year plans and new deals, dressed in golden chains, and I wonder,
still I wonder......

Five years, just long enough to get through the next election...

On Jan 28, 1:48*pm, "~^ beancounter ~^" wrote:
In 6 years, Bush borrowed about $780 billion for the Iraq war. *Obama
proposes to borrow a trillion dollars EACH YEAR for the forseeable
future on top of the existing budget. *There is an enormous diff
tween
borrowing 780 billion over 6 years and borrowing a TRILLION MORE EACH
YEAR. *I realize Libs cannot do math but at least try

On Jan 28, 11:44*am, wrote:



Salazar is talking about a "five year plan".. Sounds like an old
Creedence song..snerk

Five year plans and new deals, dressed in golden chains, and I wonder,
still I wonder......

Five years, just long enough to get through the next election...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They can do the math, it's the truth they have problems with. This new
Pork bill is only designed to secure power. If they really wanted to
stimulate the economy they would give the money to the people, or let
them keep it. A commentator noted last night that they could take all
the same money they are using to pay back the campaign donators, and
give $17,000 to every American, that would definately stimulate the
economy, but it wouldn't buy them power. Just like handing the Tarp
money to the banks and auto unions, didn't do anything for the people,
but it sure secured a lot of votes...