Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...

I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him. You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.

Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic fundamentalists
simply want you dead.

Eisboch

The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we were
opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush kissing butt
with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?

Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so making
life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for its insane
"leader."


Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.

How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?

Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?

Did you embrace him as your leader?

Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?

Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.

Read and learn.

In particular the last paragraph.

http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo

--

There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:44:51 -0500, HK wrote:

Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...

I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him. You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.

Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic fundamentalists
simply want you dead.

Eisboch

The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we were
opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush kissing butt
with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?

Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so making
life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for its insane
"leader."


Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.

How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?

Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?

Did you embrace him as your leader?

Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?

Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.

Read and learn.

In particular the last paragraph.

http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo

There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.

Uh huh.

Prove it.

--

If we aren't supposed to eat animals,
why are they made of meat?

HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...

I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him.
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.

Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.

Eisboch

The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?

Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."


Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.

How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?

Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?

Did you embrace him as your leader?

Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?

Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.

Read and learn.

In particular the last paragraph.

http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo

--

There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.

Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?

On Jan 28, 4:04*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
news:0gt0o498q3cg1a1u1743ghfo4tusjju8ef@4a x.com...

I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him. *
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.

Well, at least Bush offered an option. *The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.

Eisboch

The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?

Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."

Obama *isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.

How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? *Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? *Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?

Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?

Did you embrace him as your leader?

Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?

Obama is smart enough to engage. *You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. * I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.

Read and learn.

In particular the last paragraph.

http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo

--

There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.

Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We were cooking along ok until Pelosi and Reid swamped the economy to
win an election...

wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:04 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him.
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.
Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.
Eisboch
The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?
Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."
Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.
How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?
Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?
Did you embrace him as your leader?
Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?
Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.
Read and learn.
In particular the last paragraph.
http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo
--
There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.
Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We were cooking along ok until Pelosi and Reid swamped the economy to
win an election...

You know, you already have the Idiot Belt...are you defending it now?
From who? Loogy?

On Jan 28, 4:28*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:04 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
.. .
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
news:0gt0o498q3cg1a1u1743ghfo4tusjju8ef@ 4ax.com...
I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him.. *
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.
Well, at least Bush offered an option. *The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.
Eisboch
The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?
Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."
Obama *isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.
How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? *Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? *Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?
Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?
Did you embrace him as your leader?
Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?
Obama is smart enough to engage. *You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. * I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.
Read and learn.
In particular the last paragraph.
http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo
--
There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.
Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We were cooking along ok until Pelosi and Reid swamped the economy to
win an election...

You know, you already have the Idiot Belt...are you defending it now?
*From who? Loogy?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You are the one who has been consistantly wrong this week, do the
math...

wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:04 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him.
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.
Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.
Eisboch
The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?
Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."
Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.
How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?
Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?
Did you embrace him as your leader?
Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?
Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.
Read and learn.
In particular the last paragraph.
http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo
--
There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.
Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We were cooking along ok until Pelosi and Reid swamped the economy to
win an election...

I wish it was that simple, but Pelosi and Reid did nothing to change a
problem that went back to Carter, was aggravated by Clinton, and left to
fester under GWBush and both Democratic and Republican controlled
congress's.

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:36:59 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:04 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
HK wrote:
Wizard of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:25:15 -0800, jps wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:09:19 GMT, Wizard of Woodstock
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:37:59 -0500, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
I love how you use Obama's offer of diplomacy to belittle him.
You'd
obviously prefer Bush's "dead or alive" approach.
Well, at least Bush offered an option. The Islamic
fundamentalists simply want you dead.
Eisboch
The islamic fundies comprise a tiny portion of islam. And if we
were opposed to dealing with islamic fundies, why was bush
kissing butt with the saudis?
Why is Obama kissing butt with Iran?
Eisboch
Because it is worthwhile trying to defuse Iran and by doing so
making life and the chances of re-election a bit more difficult for
its insane "leader."
Obama isn't kissing butt...he simply is opening up channels of
communication. That's what the dummies in the Bush admin could not
figure out.
Tell me something -just out of curiosity.
How do you open dialogue with a leader who views you as a apostate and
heretic? Are you going to send your female Secretary of State to a
Islamic country to "negotiate"? Is she going to wear a burka when she
does so?
Please - I'd really like to know.
Didn't you support the guy who introduced the "Axis of Evil"?
Did you embrace him as your leader?
Why should they feel any differently about their leader if he's seen
as defending his country?
Obama is smart enough to engage. You think that opening a dialogue is
a sign of weakness. I think not opening a dialogue is a sign of
stupidity.
Read and learn.
In particular the last paragraph.
http://tinyurl.com/akeyvo
--
There's more to the leadership of Iran than the crazy guy.
Does that mean one could excuse everything George Bush said, since there
was more to the leadership of the US than George Bush?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We were cooking along ok until Pelosi and Reid swamped the economy to
win an election...

I wish it was that simple, but Pelosi and Reid did nothing to change a
problem that went back to Carter, was aggravated by Clinton, and left to
fester under GWBush and both Democratic and Republican controlled
congress's.

You forgot Canada.

And the damn geese.

And the Barney and Chris Show deserves special mention.
--
John H

* The original point and click interface was a Smith & Wesson. *