On Jan 22, 10:08*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 4:30 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

....
On Jan 22, 3:57 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Jan 22, 3:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

On Jan 22, 3:19 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 2:51 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message

...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old
hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.

You tried this stunt a couple of days ago, and when you
realized
you'd
failed and looked foolish, you ran away and hid. Why are you
trying
again? You must enjoy looking foolish.

Why did you run away and hide for several months?

I was hoping you'd open your mouth to someone standing right in
front
of
you
and end up with a shiv in your neck. I didn't wait long enough,
so
here
I
am.

Oh, and we thought it was because you got punked by some guys that
followed you here from another group and showed us pics of your
house,
fat belly, bald head, and spaghetti arms... B

==============

Nah. It was mostly boredom, to be perfectly honest. It's good to be
back,
though. I need to keep tabs on the reading comprehension problems
so
prevalent in America these days. This is just the right place to do
it.
Are
you following Frogwatch's economic theories today?

Frogwatch economic theory: Dont spend more'n you make unless you
have
very good reason to think you'll make more soon.

Obamanomics: Borrow as much as you can and then when the bills come
due blame it on somebody else.

Yes, I do think that Obamas inauguration was partly to blame for the
markets fall. The reality sunk in ,even to saps who actually think
the market will come back, that we have a moron in the White House
who
has never held a real job so thinks the government makes money.
Guess what, the market will NOT COME BACK as long as Dodd, Obama,
Pelosi et. al are in office. It cannot because nobody in his right
mind will invest.

So all the financial news reports were wrong, and your theory is
right.
Your
theory is based on your vast experience working in the field of:

{......................................}

Fill in the blank, Mr. Expert- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Groceries?
=================

No. That's me, and I'm not claiming expertise. YOU are.

What's your area of expertise? Fill in the blank:

{......................................}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really? Where did I claim expertise in stock markets?

===========

You entered the discussion.

So did you, and you claim to only be an expert in groceries. *~snerk~

===========

The difference: I don't concoct stories about how a president in place for
two days can affect the market, when all reliable financial news is
providing a coherent bunch of real reasons.

But you *do* concoct that two little banks, the State Street and Bank
of New York who are reporting some trouble, has caused all the
downturn that happened in the market. The story you linked didn't
make that connection. And your grocier's degree doesn't give you the
chops to connect those dots.

So your spin fails. Oops.

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:49:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old hopeandchange off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well hopeandchange.

Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you apparently
believe in, is a fraud.

Did you take a big hit?

Tough.

Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about her
investments.

I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes, Obama was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.

You say that after watching Bush put us in hock to our eyeballs to
China?

Oh man, this is rich.

jps wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:49:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old hopeandchange off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes, Obama was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.

You say that after watching Bush put us in hock to our eyeballs to
China?

Oh man, this is rich.

Congress appropriates the Executive spends.

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:05:52 -0500, BAR wrote:

jps wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:49:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:

Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old hopeandchange off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes, Obama was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.

You say that after watching Bush put us in hock to our eyeballs to
China?

Oh man, this is rich.

Congress appropriates the Executive spends.

They don't seem to understand that.
--
John H

* He who dies with the most toys is nonetheless DEAD*

On Jan 22, 6:51*pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 4:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

om...

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
news:n2phn4d1crclncq89tcunr2hllgmt4tevg@4ax .com...
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:09:13 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 2:41 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old
hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you
apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is
now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes, Obama
was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics
whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.
If you believe all that, you deserve to have your portfolio go
down
the
drain.
The record clearly shows that the Repubs tried to get something
done
about the problems and the DEMS wouldnt do anything saying
Freddie and
Fannie were solid.It also clearly shows that Dems were primary
benefactors of money from Freddie and fannie, including Obama.
But still, you're claiming a connection between Obama, in office
for 2
days,
and the performance of the market. This is an unbelievably stupid
thing
to
claim.
I must admit that you're very good at this "looking stupid" game.
You must have missed this:
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients
of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
That still does not effectively connect Obama (in office for 2 days)
to
the
performance of the stock market.
Tell me why you don't believe the news about State Street Bank, from
two
days ago, and why it affected the market the way it did. What's
different
about that bank?
Why focus on a few hundred points. Focus instead on a few thousand..
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
--
John H
You're talking about past history. Focus on the past two days, which
is what
the idiot Frogwatch is making claims about.

How could ANY president affect the market that way in two days?

Looks like herring's keyboard is stuck on stupid repetition...again.

Frogwatch is Herring???

No, Herring finds some stupid comment and then adds it repeated to a few
dozen posts...you'll see.

That way, he doesn't have to think too much.
You could call it making best use of a limited resource.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you mean like:

Resource this, limit boy?

On Jan 22, 4:59*pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 4:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

. ..

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:09:13 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 2:41 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you
apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes, Obama was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics
whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.
If you believe all that, you deserve to have your portfolio go down
the
drain.
The record clearly shows that the Repubs tried to get something done
about the problems and the DEMS wouldnt do anything saying Freddie and
Fannie were solid.It also clearly shows that Dems were primary
benefactors of money from Freddie and fannie, including Obama.
But still, you're claiming a connection between Obama, in office for 2
days,
and the performance of the market. This is an unbelievably stupid thing
to
claim.
I must admit that you're very good at this "looking stupid" game.
You must have missed this:
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
That still does not effectively connect Obama (in office for 2 days) to
the
performance of the stock market.
Tell me why you don't believe the news about State Street Bank, from two
days ago, and why it affected the market the way it did. What's different
about that bank?
Why focus on a few hundred points. Focus instead on a few thousand.
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
--
John H
You're talking about past history. Focus on the past two days, which is what
the idiot Frogwatch is making claims about.

How could ANY president affect the market that way in two days?

I stand by my reasoning that the realization of an idiot taking office
affected the market. *Here is how: *"OMG, it's really going to happen,
we have an idiot who thinks he can borrow his way to prosperity about
to be come president for real, SELL, SELL, SELL"

If you are "in" the market, you are the idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

This is the best time to BUY stocks. You buy low, sell high. Any dummy
knows that.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 10:08 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 4:30 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 3:57 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 3:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

On Jan 22, 3:19 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 2:51 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message

...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old
hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.

You tried this stunt a couple of days ago, and when you
realized
you'd
failed and looked foolish, you ran away and hid. Why are you
trying
again? You must enjoy looking foolish.

Why did you run away and hide for several months?

I was hoping you'd open your mouth to someone standing right in
front
of
you
and end up with a shiv in your neck. I didn't wait long enough,
so
here
I
am.

Oh, and we thought it was because you got punked by some guys
that
followed you here from another group and showed us pics of your
house,
fat belly, bald head, and spaghetti arms... B

==============

Nah. It was mostly boredom, to be perfectly honest. It's good to
be
back,
though. I need to keep tabs on the reading comprehension problems
so
prevalent in America these days. This is just the right place to
do
it.
Are
you following Frogwatch's economic theories today?

Frogwatch economic theory: Dont spend more'n you make unless you
have
very good reason to think you'll make more soon.

Obamanomics: Borrow as much as you can and then when the bills
come
due blame it on somebody else.

Yes, I do think that Obamas inauguration was partly to blame for
the
markets fall. The reality sunk in ,even to saps who actually think
the market will come back, that we have a moron in the White House
who
has never held a real job so thinks the government makes money.
Guess what, the market will NOT COME BACK as long as Dodd, Obama,
Pelosi et. al are in office. It cannot because nobody in his right
mind will invest.

So all the financial news reports were wrong, and your theory is
right.
Your
theory is based on your vast experience working in the field of:

{......................................}

Fill in the blank, Mr. Expert- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Groceries?
=================

No. That's me, and I'm not claiming expertise. YOU are.

What's your area of expertise? Fill in the blank:

{......................................}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Really? Where did I claim expertise in stock markets?

===========

You entered the discussion.

So did you, and you claim to only be an expert in groceries. ~snerk~

===========

The difference: I don't concoct stories about how a president in place for
two days can affect the market, when all reliable financial news is
providing a coherent bunch of real reasons.

But you *do* concoct that two little banks, the State Street and Bank
of New York who are reporting some trouble, has caused all the
downturn that happened in the market. The story you linked didn't
make that connection. And your grocier's degree doesn't give you the
chops to connect those dots.

So your spin fails. Oops.
=========================


Actually, the article I provided made the reasons perfectly clear to anyone
who's held investments like mutual funds for many years, and actually read
their statements. It's one of the biggest banks ***OF ITS TYPE***. Because
State Street didn't have the type of exposure typical of bigger companies
like Citigroup, it was the last company anyone expected to end up in the
toilet with the rest. The fact that State Street **IS** suddenly reporting
problems is what gave the market the latest message.

On Jan 22, 4:30*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 3:57 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 3:41 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

....

On Jan 22, 3:19 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 2:51 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

"BAR" wrote in message

...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.

You tried this stunt a couple of days ago, and when you realized
you'd
failed and looked foolish, you ran away and hid. Why are you
trying
again? You must enjoy looking foolish.

Why did you run away and hide for several months?

I was hoping you'd open your mouth to someone standing right in
front
of
you
and end up with a shiv in your neck. I didn't wait long enough, so
here
I
am.

Oh, and we thought it was because you got punked by some guys that
followed you here from another group and showed us pics of your
house,
fat belly, bald head, and spaghetti arms... B

==============

Nah. It was mostly boredom, to be perfectly honest. It's good to be
back,
though. I need to keep tabs on the reading comprehension problems so
prevalent in America these days. This is just the right place to do
it.
Are
you following Frogwatch's economic theories today?

Frogwatch economic theory: Dont spend more'n you make unless you have
very good reason to think you'll make more soon.

Obamanomics: Borrow as much as you can and then when the bills come
due blame it on somebody else.

Yes, I do think that Obamas inauguration was partly to blame for the
markets fall. The reality sunk in ,even to saps who actually think
the market will come back, that we have a moron in the White House who
has never held a real job so thinks the government makes money.
Guess what, the market will NOT COME BACK as long as Dodd, Obama,
Pelosi et. al are in office. It cannot because nobody in his right
mind will invest.

So all the financial news reports were wrong, and your theory is right.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 6:51 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 4:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

om...

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
news:n2phn4d1crclncq89tcunr2hllgmt4tevg@4ax .com...
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:09:13 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 2:41 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old
hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you
apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is
now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about
her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes,
Obama
was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics
whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.
If you believe all that, you deserve to have your portfolio go
down
the
drain.
The record clearly shows that the Repubs tried to get something
done
about the problems and the DEMS wouldnt do anything saying
Freddie and
Fannie were solid.It also clearly shows that Dems were primary
benefactors of money from Freddie and fannie, including Obama.
But still, you're claiming a connection between Obama, in office
for 2
days,
and the performance of the market. This is an unbelievably
stupid
thing
to
claim.
I must admit that you're very good at this "looking stupid"
game.
You must have missed this:
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients
of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
That still does not effectively connect Obama (in office for 2
days)
to
the
performance of the stock market.
Tell me why you don't believe the news about State Street Bank,
from
two
days ago, and why it affected the market the way it did. What's
different
about that bank?
Why focus on a few hundred points. Focus instead on a few thousand.
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients
of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
--
John H
You're talking about past history. Focus on the past two days, which
is what
the idiot Frogwatch is making claims about.

How could ANY president affect the market that way in two days?

Looks like herring's keyboard is stuck on stupid repetition...again.

Frogwatch is Herring???

No, Herring finds some stupid comment and then adds it repeated to a few
dozen posts...you'll see.

That way, he doesn't have to think too much.
You could call it making best use of a limited resource.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you mean like:

Resource this, limit boy?

*********************************************

Don't quit your day job.

On Jan 23, 7:21*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 22, 6:51 pm, "Don White" wrote:





"HK" wrote in message

...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 4:43 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

om...

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
news:n2phn4d1crclncq89tcunr2hllgmt4tevg@4ax .com...
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:09:13 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jan 22, 2:41 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:42 pm, wrote:
On Jan 22, 1:25 pm, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
Looks like the market is trying to wipe that old
hopeandchange
off
it's shoes again, falling like , like, like, like, well
hopeandchange.
Didn't you get the memo, Froggy? Your market, the one you
apparently
believe in, is a fraud.
Did you take a big hit?
Tough.
Harry, anybody that has had even a little success in life is
now
taking a hit.
Of course you wouldn't know that, but ask your wife about
her
investments.
I blame Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and other Dems and yes,
Obama
was
paid off by Freddie mac too.
Of course, Obama has invoked the Kumbaya Theory of Economics
whereby
if we borrow money we get rich.
If you believe all that, you deserve to have your portfolio go
down
the
drain.
The record clearly shows that the Repubs tried to get something
done
about the problems and the DEMS wouldnt do anything saying
Freddie and
Fannie were solid.It also clearly shows that Dems were primary
benefactors of money from Freddie and fannie, including Obama.
But still, you're claiming a connection between Obama, in office
for 2
days,
and the performance of the market. This is an unbelievably
stupid
thing
to
claim.
I must admit that you're very good at this "looking stupid"
game.
You must have missed this:
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients
of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
That still does not effectively connect Obama (in office for 2
days)
to
the
performance of the stock market.
Tell me why you don't believe the news about State Street Bank,
from
two
days ago, and why it affected the market the way it did. What's
different
about that bank?
Why focus on a few hundred points. Focus instead on a few thousand.
Not hard to figure when you realize that the three top recipients
of
freddie and fannie money were, in order...
Chris Dodd
Barak Obama
John Kerry...
--
John H
You're talking about past history. Focus on the past two days, which
is what
the idiot Frogwatch is making claims about.

How could ANY president affect the market that way in two days?

Looks like herring's keyboard is stuck on stupid repetition...again..

Frogwatch is Herring???

No, Herring finds some stupid comment and then adds it repeated to a few
dozen posts...you'll see.

That way, he doesn't have to think too much.
You could call it making best use of a limited resource.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you mean like:

Resource this, limit boy?

*********************************************

Don't quit your day job.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good, I'm glad you now realize how childish and silly that crap sounds!