Tim wrote:
On Jan 11, 6:16 am, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:25 am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:35 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:
On Jan 10, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected Mayor,
gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And, she
can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day.
Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she didn't
leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh? Her
daughter is now a high school dropout.
So was Thomas Edison.
Do you have difficulty recognizing the gulf between Edison and Palin's
relative intellects?
That woman is dumb as a stump. She's got charm and natural political
savvy (apart from the Hitler routine) but she couldn't think her way
out of two sheets of newspaper.
Besides, I was commenting about the governors daughter.
ho were you thiking of?
The governor's daughter is dumber than a stump. The product of a high
middle income family, she should have known better than to allow herself
to become pregnant, and then talked into going full-term and marrying
her high-school dropout boyfriend.

This is all her mother's fault.

nope,


Sure it is. Mama Palin did not raise Sprocket, or whatever her name is,
properly. A properly raised daughter would not have gotten pregnant and
would have resisted being forced to carry full-term or to marry a high
school dropout boyfriend.

My feeling is the daughter was pressured into her choices.

BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...

On Jan 10, 6:15 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
More drool from Andy Borwitz..

There's more cleverness and wit in Andy's farts than anything
you have
done in your entire life, with the possible exception of getting
in a
fight with the cops at your local police station.

No there isn't. All he sells is hate. It's the same lame comedy
(being
generous here) that ruined Saturday Night Live and Air America... it
sells great to folks like you and readers of the Huffington Hoax..


------------------

Which reminds me. I was watching one of Harry's favorites, Rachael
Maddow the other day.
I get a kick out of her because she's so blatantly biased. She was
interviewing some guest, discussing a subject that had absolutely
nothing
to do with Bush, Obama, the economy or anything of current
importance yet
somehow she found a way to cast blame on Bush in response to almost
anything the guest said. It was comical and I wish I had a tape
recorder
or DVR on to preserve it.

I guess it's currently the "in" thing to be an elitist, liberal,
Bush
bashing celebrity I guess. It surprises me because she holds a
PhD in
something, so she's not stupid. Just brainwashed.

Eisboch


Bush has had a hand in or on just about every major problem this
country
is facing. The majority of adults in this country give him very
low marks
and will be pleased to see him out of office. Maddow's doctorate
is from
one of the Oxford colleges.

So what? Bush went to Yale. You are so over impressed with academic
credentials that you are blinded to reality.

Eisboch

A C student who got in on his family's coattails.

They guy doesn't have critical thinking skills. He's just ****ed up
the 5th job he's had in his adult life.

He's batting 1.000


Which has nothing to do with Harry's fascination and worship of
people with Ivy league degrees.
It's a common issue in his assessment of the "smartness", job
qualifications and value of others.

During a presidential news conference, I particularly liked Ronald
Reagan's response to a reporter who was trying to make a name for
himself by asking about Reagan's school (Eureka College) in a wise
ass and critical way.

Reagan paused for a minute then replied (paraphrasing), "gee, I was
just thinking of what I could have become if I had gone to a big name
school".

IMO, Reagan was a lot smarter and accomplished than the modern left
give him credit for.
I am not necessarily speaking of his policies. I am referring to his
leadership qualities. He was secure in his mind of what he wanted to
achieve, he handled himself well in a crisis and oozed with optimism
for the future which was infectious to the rest of the population.
That's true leadership. I am not alone in this assessment or
opinion. More and more people that worked closely with him are
coming forward, discounting many of the rumors and myths of him being
a "dullard" or asleep at the wheel.

Eisboch



Which has nothing to do with George W. Bush or Sarah Palin, who are
dunces, and Rachel Maddow, who is not. There's nothing about Bush's
academic background that impresses me. He got into Yale as a legacy
and Harvard Biz because of family connections. He was a mediocre
student and he is a mediocre intellect. Palin is intellectually lazy,
and it shows.
Maddow is very, very bright and it shows.

The problem with your argument is that by denigrating Sarah Palin and
George W Bush and their accomplishments you minimize any one else when
they accomplish the same thing. Being a governor or president isn't an
achievement of merit, hell Sarah Palin and George W Bush were Governors.
And George W Bush was President. Barak H Obama hasn't done anything that
a dunce off the street hadn't already accomplished. And, Bush a dunce
had already attended an Ivy League school not much of an accomplishment
Barak H Obama to do what a dunce has already done.

Maddow is a radical partisan. The only thing interesting about here is
that she is a fresh face in the crowd.


Yawn.

On Jan 11, 8:39*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Jim wrote:
hk wrote:
BAR wrote:

Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected
Mayor, gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the
US. And, she can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in
the same day.

Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she
didn't leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise
them, eh? Her daughter is now a high school dropout.

Not a brain in that woman's head. Nada. Zip.

Sounds like you are jealous of the woman. Maybe your buddy in Ohio
could recommend a shrink to deal with your hangups.

Why would you think I am jealous of Palin? Because she had too many
kids and not enough responsibility to edu-ma-cate and rear them
properly? Because she is intellectually lazy? Because she sounds like
a ditz? Because her future son-in-law is a high school dropout?

Ohhhh, Harry you made a little boo-boo. *For months you have pretended
you had Jim in your bozo bin, and you would only respond to his post
indirectly. *In your old age, you can't keep up with who you have in
your "bozo bin" and responded directly to his post. *You have to
remember, when you are reading the folder marked Bozo Bin, you are not
supposed to click on the reply button.

They do have drugs that can help with Alzheimer's. *My wife and
daughter both have Dr. Dr. degrees, in fact, my daughter is working on
her Dr. Dr. Dr. and Dr. degrees. *After discussing this problem with
them they told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT. *While
most doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post,
the fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK. *

Put your one inch woodie back in your trousers, reggie. I have a new
install of Vista on my Mac laptop, and I haven't bothered to set up the
filters...yet. Thus, I am also seeing your vomitus...for the moment. But
don't get too excited...your presence in my newsgroup inbox will be
coming to an end later today.

Meanwhile, go **** yourself.

Harry, you spend more time setting up your filters than anyone I know.
Most people just click the set up filter button, and the spend less than
10 secs setting up the filter for those they don't want to read. *You
spent more time responding to Jim and my post than it would have taken
to set up 20 filters.

PS - If you put a note on your computer monitor, it might help you to
remember not to respond to the post you have moved over to your Bozo
Bin. *- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't most readers have the ability to simply trasfer over the
settings such as filters, etc.? I am not an expert like Harry, but,
uh, neither is Harry?

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...
snip...
After discussing this problem with them *they
told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT*. While most doctors
would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post, the fact that
they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK.


How would your wife & daughter know what Harry talks to his doctor about?
Careful Waylon...your **** level is about to rise above your ears and
dribble out in public.

On Jan 11, 9:14*am, Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:





hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Obvious. *Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?

Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or
13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.

It's consensual, by the way.

I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.

And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.

You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. *About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.

I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.

She must have been a real skank.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yup, like I tell my girls.. If a young adolescent guy or gal has to
reach back a few years for a mate, there must be something wrong that
kids their own age have figured out... She was either a skank, a total
idiot, or grossly overweight... Maybe all three?

BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...

On Jan 10, 6:15 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
More drool from Andy Borwitz..

There's more cleverness and wit in Andy's farts than anything
you have
done in your entire life, with the possible exception of getting
in a
fight with the cops at your local police station.

No there isn't. All he sells is hate. It's the same lame comedy
(being
generous here) that ruined Saturday Night Live and Air America... it
sells great to folks like you and readers of the Huffington Hoax..


------------------

Which reminds me. I was watching one of Harry's favorites, Rachael
Maddow the other day.
I get a kick out of her because she's so blatantly biased. She was
interviewing some guest, discussing a subject that had absolutely
nothing
to do with Bush, Obama, the economy or anything of current
importance yet
somehow she found a way to cast blame on Bush in response to almost
anything the guest said. It was comical and I wish I had a tape
recorder
or DVR on to preserve it.

I guess it's currently the "in" thing to be an elitist, liberal,
Bush
bashing celebrity I guess. It surprises me because she holds a
PhD in
something, so she's not stupid. Just brainwashed.

Eisboch


Bush has had a hand in or on just about every major problem this
country
is facing. The majority of adults in this country give him very
low marks
and will be pleased to see him out of office. Maddow's doctorate
is from
one of the Oxford colleges.

So what? Bush went to Yale. You are so over impressed with academic
credentials that you are blinded to reality.

Eisboch

A C student who got in on his family's coattails.

They guy doesn't have critical thinking skills. He's just ****ed up
the 5th job he's had in his adult life.

He's batting 1.000


Which has nothing to do with Harry's fascination and worship of
people with Ivy league degrees.
It's a common issue in his assessment of the "smartness", job
qualifications and value of others.

During a presidential news conference, I particularly liked Ronald
Reagan's response to a reporter who was trying to make a name for
himself by asking about Reagan's school (Eureka College) in a wise
ass and critical way.

Reagan paused for a minute then replied (paraphrasing), "gee, I was
just thinking of what I could have become if I had gone to a big name
school".

IMO, Reagan was a lot smarter and accomplished than the modern left
give him credit for.
I am not necessarily speaking of his policies. I am referring to his
leadership qualities. He was secure in his mind of what he wanted to
achieve, he handled himself well in a crisis and oozed with optimism
for the future which was infectious to the rest of the population.
That's true leadership. I am not alone in this assessment or
opinion. More and more people that worked closely with him are
coming forward, discounting many of the rumors and myths of him being
a "dullard" or asleep at the wheel.

Eisboch



Which has nothing to do with George W. Bush or Sarah Palin, who are
dunces, and Rachel Maddow, who is not. There's nothing about Bush's
academic background that impresses me. He got into Yale as a legacy
and Harvard Biz because of family connections. He was a mediocre
student and he is a mediocre intellect. Palin is intellectually lazy,
and it shows.
Maddow is very, very bright and it shows.

The problem with your argument is that by denigrating Sarah Palin and
George W Bush and their accomplishments you minimize any one else when
they accomplish the same thing. Being a governor or president isn't an
achievement of merit, hell Sarah Palin and George W Bush were Governors.
And George W Bush was President. Barak H Obama hasn't done anything that
a dunce off the street hadn't already accomplished. And, Bush a dunce
had already attended an Ivy League school not much of an accomplishment
Barak H Obama to do what a dunce has already done.

Maddow is a radical partisan. The only thing interesting about here is
that she is a fresh face in the crowd.

Just looked up Maddow. She's kind of cute. Who is she dating?

wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:





hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.
Harry, you are lying through your teeth.
You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.
It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.
Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.
Use an index of some sort will you?
Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or
13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.
It's consensual, by the way.
I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.
And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.
You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.
I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.
She must have been a real skank.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yup, like I tell my girls.. If a young adolescent guy or gal has to
reach back a few years for a mate, there must be something wrong that
kids their own age have figured out... She was either a skank, a total
idiot, or grossly overweight... Maybe all three?


Au contraire...she was very cute and very active, and smart enough never
to get into arguments with cops at a police station.

"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message
...

Which explains why Harry Krause has fabricated his Yale story. He is hung
up on his inability to get an Ivy League education. I still don't
understand why or how he ever came up with Univ. of Kansas in his quest to
get a quality Liberal Arts Education.

If you look at the number of people who have been successful in their
chosen fields you will see most DO NOT have an Ivy League school
education.

I would also postulate that most of those successful individuals who DO
HAVE an Ivy League would have been successful no matter what college they
went to.

The Ivy League education can help someone in their first job, but after
that, it is up to the individual's ability to perform.


I don't know if Harry attended Yale or not and don't really care. I get a
bit responsive though when he his critical of others in terms of their
education or tries to justify the qualifications of people based on what
school they went to rather than what they accomplish.

With our kids I preached that in reality it didn't matter what school you
went to as long as you pursued a degree. A degree is a key for opportunity
but unless you plan to enter the job market as an attorney or something at
some prestigious law firm, the school you attended and earned your degree
from really isn't that important. The biggest battle I had with our oldest
son was trying to convince him that his school selection should not be based
on the football coach's offensive line strategy. (He was quarterback and
team captain of his high school football team).

I saw a show the other day where a professor at a well known big university
was discussing this. She made the point that more focus and interest should
be given to trade and technical schools in the US. Mike Barnacle was also
a panelist on the show and he and she both agreed that one of the biggest
educational "bargains" today are Jr. Colleges and state universities, both
of which Barnacle attended and earned his degree.

Having dealt with many people who never left the world of academia, worked
at big colleges and universities and rated themselves and their peers based
on how many papers they authored and delivered, I couldn't agree more with
the show's quest or Barnacle.

Eisboch

wrote:
On Jan 11, 8:39 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Jim wrote:
hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected
Mayor, gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the
US. And, she can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in
the same day.
Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she
didn't leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise
them, eh? Her daughter is now a high school dropout.
Not a brain in that woman's head. Nada. Zip.
Sounds like you are jealous of the woman. Maybe your buddy in Ohio
could recommend a shrink to deal with your hangups.
Why would you think I am jealous of Palin? Because she had too many
kids and not enough responsibility to edu-ma-cate and rear them
properly? Because she is intellectually lazy? Because she sounds like
a ditz? Because her future son-in-law is a high school dropout?
Ohhhh, Harry you made a little boo-boo. For months you have pretended
you had Jim in your bozo bin, and you would only respond to his post
indirectly. In your old age, you can't keep up with who you have in
your "bozo bin" and responded directly to his post. You have to
remember, when you are reading the folder marked Bozo Bin, you are not
supposed to click on the reply button.
They do have drugs that can help with Alzheimer's. My wife and
daughter both have Dr. Dr. degrees, in fact, my daughter is working on
her Dr. Dr. Dr. and Dr. degrees. After discussing this problem with
them they told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT. While
most doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post,
the fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK.
Put your one inch woodie back in your trousers, reggie. I have a new
install of Vista on my Mac laptop, and I haven't bothered to set up the
filters...yet. Thus, I am also seeing your vomitus...for the moment. But
don't get too excited...your presence in my newsgroup inbox will be
coming to an end later today.
Meanwhile, go **** yourself.
Harry, you spend more time setting up your filters than anyone I know.
Most people just click the set up filter button, and the spend less than
10 secs setting up the filter for those they don't want to read. You
spent more time responding to Jim and my post than it would have taken
to set up 20 filters.

PS - If you put a note on your computer monitor, it might help you to
remember not to respond to the post you have moved over to your Bozo
Bin. - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Don't most readers have the ability to simply trasfer over the
settings such as filters, etc.? I am not an expert like Harry, but,
uh, neither is Harry?



I don't know about "most" readers, but transferring over filter settings
from a PC Windoze version of T'bird to a Mac version is not a trivial
task. For starters, the two operating systems have different file
attributes and stash files and folders in different places within the
OS. There's an add-on that allows saving settings, email, addresses, et
cetera, and then stuffing them back into a new copy of T'bird, but it
doesn't work cross-platform.

It only takes a couple of minutes to set up filters, and I started the
process on my new VISTA setup. So far, Reggie, Herring and the pile of
schitt known as Florida Jim are in there. Plenty of room for others.

hk wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:14 am, Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:





hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who
claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.
Harry, you are lying through your teeth.
You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such
thing as
concentual sex between underage children.
It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.
Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.
Use an index of some sort will you?
Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or
13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name,
though.
It's consensual, by the way.
I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.
And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.
You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.
I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.
She must have been a real skank.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yup, like I tell my girls.. If a young adolescent guy or gal has to
reach back a few years for a mate, there must be something wrong that
kids their own age have figured out... She was either a skank, a total
idiot, or grossly overweight... Maybe all three?


Au contraire...she was very cute and very active, and smart enough never
to get into arguments with cops at a police station.

Skanks don't have to be ugly. Just very active. But who am I to make
judgments of Harry's questionable morals and judgment. It's plain as the
pustules on his face.