On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.

I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used the
term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used the
term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?


Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or 13,
and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.

It's consensual, by the way.

I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.

And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.

hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?


Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or 13,
and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.

It's consensual, by the way.

I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.

And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.


You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.

I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:32:21 -0500, Boater wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Jim wrote:
hk wrote:
BAR wrote:


Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected
Mayor, gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the
US. And, she can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in
the same day.


Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she
didn't leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise
them, eh? Her daughter is now a high school dropout.

Not a brain in that woman's head. Nada. Zip.

Sounds like you are jealous of the woman. Maybe your buddy in Ohio
could recommend a shrink to deal with your hangups.


Why would you think I am jealous of Palin? Because she had too many
kids and not enough responsibility to edu-ma-cate and rear them
properly? Because she is intellectually lazy? Because she sounds like
a ditz? Because her future son-in-law is a high school dropout?


Ohhhh, Harry you made a little boo-boo. For months you have pretended
you had Jim in your bozo bin, and you would only respond to his post
indirectly. In your old age, you can't keep up with who you have in
your "bozo bin" and responded directly to his post. You have to
remember, when you are reading the folder marked Bozo Bin, you are not
supposed to click on the reply button.

They do have drugs that can help with Alzheimer's. My wife and daughter
both have Dr. Dr. degrees, in fact, my daughter is working on her Dr.
Dr. Dr. and Dr. degrees. After discussing this problem with them they
told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT. While most
doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post, the
fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK.


Put your one inch woodie back in your trousers, reggie. I have a new
install of Vista on my Mac laptop, and I haven't bothered to set up the
filters...yet. Thus, I am also seeing your vomitus...for the moment. But
don't get too excited...your presence in my newsgroup inbox will be
coming to an end later today.

Meanwhile, go **** yourself.


Harry, I'll break my New Year's resolution to tell you that you're always
good for a laugh.

WAFL!

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:04:05 GMT, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:34:34 -0500, Jim wrote:

hk wrote:
BAR wrote:


Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected Mayor,
gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And, she
can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day.


Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she didn't
leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh? Her
daughter is now a high school dropout.

Not a brain in that woman's head. Nada. Zip.

Sounds like you are jealous of the woman. Maybe your buddy in Ohio could
recommend a shrink to deal with your hangups.

Have you guys ever noticed that our good friend and long time foil
Harry takes these extreme positions on almost every political issue
that comes up for discussion?

And that he's got nothing to back it up - just invective?

Try ignoring him for a while - it's fun to watch him attempt to get
your attention. Then you answer him once or twice, then ignore him
again.

It will drive him nuts - well, more nuts than he already is. :)

It works like a champ.

John H wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:04:05 GMT, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:34:34 -0500, Jim wrote:

hk wrote:
BAR wrote:

Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected Mayor,
gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And, she
can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day.

Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she didn't
leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh? Her
daughter is now a high school dropout.

Not a brain in that woman's head. Nada. Zip.
Sounds like you are jealous of the woman. Maybe your buddy in Ohio could
recommend a shrink to deal with your hangups.
Have you guys ever noticed that our good friend and long time foil
Harry takes these extreme positions on almost every political issue
that comes up for discussion?

And that he's got nothing to back it up - just invective?

Try ignoring him for a while - it's fun to watch him attempt to get
your attention. Then you answer him once or twice, then ignore him
again.

It will drive him nuts - well, more nuts than he already is. :)

It works like a champ.

It must have really crushed him when you shunned him like you did. I
wonder if he will ever get over it.

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
hk wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

Obvious. Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he
was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12.
I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used
the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim.

Harry, you are lying through your teeth.

You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve.
Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as
concentual sex between underage children.

It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion.

Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight.

Use an index of some sort will you?


Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or
13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though.

It's consensual, by the way.

I didn't complain. Despite the statutes.

And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school.


You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems
with Alzheimer. About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her
being 16.

I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old.
It is not a pretty sight.

She must have been a real skank.

On Jan 11, 6:16*am, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:25 am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:35 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Jan 10, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected Mayor,
gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And, she
can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day.
Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she didn't
leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh? Her
daughter is now a high school dropout.
So was Thomas Edison.
Do you have difficulty recognizing the gulf between Edison and Palin's
relative intellects?

That woman is dumb as a stump. *She's got charm and natural *political
savvy (apart from the Hitler routine) but she couldn't think her way
out of two sheets of newspaper.

Besides, I was commenting about the governors daughter.

ho were you thiking of?

The governor's daughter is dumber than a stump. The product of a high
middle income family, she should have known better than to allow herself
to become pregnant, and then talked into going full-term and marrying
her high-school dropout boyfriend.

This is all her mother's fault.

nope,

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
...

On Jan 10, 6:15 pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
More drool from Andy Borwitz..

There's more cleverness and wit in Andy's farts than anything you
have
done in your entire life, with the possible exception of getting
in a
fight with the cops at your local police station.

No there isn't. All he sells is hate. It's the same lame comedy
(being
generous here) that ruined Saturday Night Live and Air America... it
sells great to folks like you and readers of the Huffington Hoax..


------------------

Which reminds me. I was watching one of Harry's favorites, Rachael
Maddow the other day.
I get a kick out of her because she's so blatantly biased. She was
interviewing some guest, discussing a subject that had absolutely
nothing
to do with Bush, Obama, the economy or anything of current
importance yet
somehow she found a way to cast blame on Bush in response to almost
anything the guest said. It was comical and I wish I had a tape
recorder
or DVR on to preserve it.

I guess it's currently the "in" thing to be an elitist, liberal, Bush
bashing celebrity I guess. It surprises me because she holds a
PhD in
something, so she's not stupid. Just brainwashed.

Eisboch


Bush has had a hand in or on just about every major problem this
country
is facing. The majority of adults in this country give him very low
marks
and will be pleased to see him out of office. Maddow's doctorate is
from
one of the Oxford colleges.

So what? Bush went to Yale. You are so over impressed with academic
credentials that you are blinded to reality.

Eisboch

A C student who got in on his family's coattails.

They guy doesn't have critical thinking skills. He's just ****ed up
the 5th job he's had in his adult life.

He's batting 1.000


Which has nothing to do with Harry's fascination and worship of people
with Ivy league degrees.
It's a common issue in his assessment of the "smartness", job
qualifications and value of others.

During a presidential news conference, I particularly liked Ronald
Reagan's response to a reporter who was trying to make a name for
himself by asking about Reagan's school (Eureka College) in a wise ass
and critical way.

Reagan paused for a minute then replied (paraphrasing), "gee, I was
just thinking of what I could have become if I had gone to a big name
school".

IMO, Reagan was a lot smarter and accomplished than the modern left
give him credit for.
I am not necessarily speaking of his policies. I am referring to his
leadership qualities. He was secure in his mind of what he wanted to
achieve, he handled himself well in a crisis and oozed with optimism
for the future which was infectious to the rest of the population.
That's true leadership. I am not alone in this assessment or
opinion. More and more people that worked closely with him are coming
forward, discounting many of the rumors and myths of him being a
"dullard" or asleep at the wheel.

Eisboch



Which has nothing to do with George W. Bush or Sarah Palin, who are
dunces, and Rachel Maddow, who is not. There's nothing about Bush's
academic background that impresses me. He got into Yale as a legacy and
Harvard Biz because of family connections. He was a mediocre student and
he is a mediocre intellect. Palin is intellectually lazy, and it shows.
Maddow is very, very bright and it shows.

The problem with your argument is that by denigrating Sarah Palin and
George W Bush and their accomplishments you minimize any one else when
they accomplish the same thing. Being a governor or president isn't an
achievement of merit, hell Sarah Palin and George W Bush were Governors.
And George W Bush was President. Barak H Obama hasn't done anything that
a dunce off the street hadn't already accomplished. And, Bush a dunce
had already attended an Ivy League school not much of an accomplishment
Barak H Obama to do what a dunce has already done.

Maddow is a radical partisan. The only thing interesting about here is
that she is a fresh face in the crowd.

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:
On Jan 11, 3:25 am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:35 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Jan 10, 10:11 pm, hk wrote:
BAR wrote:
Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected
Mayor,
gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And,
she
can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day.
Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she
didn't
leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh?
Her
daughter is now a high school dropout.
So was Thomas Edison.
Do you have difficulty recognizing the gulf between Edison and Palin's
relative intellects?

That woman is dumb as a stump. She's got charm and natural political
savvy (apart from the Hitler routine) but she couldn't think her way
out of two sheets of newspaper.

Besides, I was commenting about the governors daughter.

ho were you thiking of?


The governor's daughter is dumber than a stump. The product of a high
middle income family, she should have known better than to allow herself
to become pregnant, and then talked into going full-term and marrying
her high-school dropout boyfriend.

This is all her mother's fault.


This is not an inquiry. It's only a comment.

Your comments would tend to lead people to believe that you have never
had a teenaged daughter.

Eisboch


Well, I did. But she's all grown up now, married, with children. In her
teen years, she knew how to prevent pregnancies and transmission of STDs.
Her mother and I made sure she knew, and so did her schools.
And my daughter was and is about as stubborn as can be. But she sure as
hell did not want to be an unmarried teen mother.


Well that's good and congratulations. As an experienced parent of a
teenaged girl I am sure you can appreciate the fact that other parents with
the same level of effort aren't always so successful.

Eisboch