Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#101
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
"Jim" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Jim" wrote in message ... Just looked up Maddow. She's kind of cute. Who is she dating? She's taken. Her "life" partner is even cuter. Eisboch Wait a minute. Does life partner mean what I think it does? Indeed. Eisboch |
#102
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." (Reggie Crap Deleted) I don't know if Harry attended Yale or not and don't really care. I get a bit responsive though when he his critical of others in terms of their education or tries to justify the qualifications of people based on what school they went to rather than what they accomplish. With our kids I preached that in reality it didn't matter what school you went to as long as you pursued a degree. A degree is a key for opportunity but unless you plan to enter the job market as an attorney or something at some prestigious law firm, the school you attended and earned your degree from really isn't that important. The biggest battle I had with our oldest son was trying to convince him that his school selection should not be based on the football coach's offensive line strategy. (He was quarterback and team captain of his high school football team). I saw a show the other day where a professor at a well known big university was discussing this. She made the point that more focus and interest should be given to trade and technical schools in the US. Mike Barnacle was also a panelist on the show and he and she both agreed that one of the biggest educational "bargains" today are Jr. Colleges and state universities, both of which Barnacle attended and earned his degree. Having dealt with many people who never left the world of academia, worked at big colleges and universities and rated themselves and their peers based on how many papers they authored and delivered, I couldn't agree more with the show's quest or Barnacle. Eisboch There's nothing wrong with pursuing education at any reputable institution of higher learning. Unless things have changed dramatically, there is little difference in the first two years of course at Ivy schools and at any decent major public university. Most are taught by a combination of TA's and lower rank professors. The higher level courses at Ivy schools and other prestigious institutions tend to be run by higher ranking professors. There is a difference in grad schools, though, at least in the liberal arts. I had a very famous faculty chair directing me for my M.A. in English, and I don't think that would have been the case at, say, Michigan State, which, by the way, is a fine institution. My wife is experiencing a quality faculty as she finishes up her dissertation. There are three faculty committees that guided and criticized her research. She has a colleague who is pursuing the same degree at another institution. The colleague does not have to write a dissertation. Apparently, there are a number of name-brand institutions that do no require their grad students to research and write a long paper as part of the process of earning an advanced degree. *That* is a loss. But as been pointed out, no one really looks at your grad school courses when you apply for a job. Your wife is going for her third terminal degree? She is going to be a Dr. Dr. Dr. |
#103
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:51:31 -0500, Jim wrote: BAR wrote: hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:43:33 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 6:15 pm, hk wrote: wrote: More drool from Andy Borwitz.. There's more cleverness and wit in Andy's farts than anything you have done in your entire life, with the possible exception of getting in a fight with the cops at your local police station. No there isn't. All he sells is hate. It's the same lame comedy (being generous here) that ruined Saturday Night Live and Air America... it sells great to folks like you and readers of the Huffington Hoax.. ------------------ Which reminds me. I was watching one of Harry's favorites, Rachael Maddow the other day. I get a kick out of her because she's so blatantly biased. She was interviewing some guest, discussing a subject that had absolutely nothing to do with Bush, Obama, the economy or anything of current importance yet somehow she found a way to cast blame on Bush in response to almost anything the guest said. It was comical and I wish I had a tape recorder or DVR on to preserve it. I guess it's currently the "in" thing to be an elitist, liberal, Bush bashing celebrity I guess. It surprises me because she holds a PhD in something, so she's not stupid. Just brainwashed. Eisboch Bush has had a hand in or on just about every major problem this country is facing. The majority of adults in this country give him very low marks and will be pleased to see him out of office. Maddow's doctorate is from one of the Oxford colleges. So what? Bush went to Yale. You are so over impressed with academic credentials that you are blinded to reality. Eisboch A C student who got in on his family's coattails. They guy doesn't have critical thinking skills. He's just ****ed up the 5th job he's had in his adult life. He's batting 1.000 Which has nothing to do with Harry's fascination and worship of people with Ivy league degrees. It's a common issue in his assessment of the "smartness", job qualifications and value of others. During a presidential news conference, I particularly liked Ronald Reagan's response to a reporter who was trying to make a name for himself by asking about Reagan's school (Eureka College) in a wise ass and critical way. Reagan paused for a minute then replied (paraphrasing), "gee, I was just thinking of what I could have become if I had gone to a big name school". IMO, Reagan was a lot smarter and accomplished than the modern left give him credit for. I am not necessarily speaking of his policies. I am referring to his leadership qualities. He was secure in his mind of what he wanted to achieve, he handled himself well in a crisis and oozed with optimism for the future which was infectious to the rest of the population. That's true leadership. I am not alone in this assessment or opinion. More and more people that worked closely with him are coming forward, discounting many of the rumors and myths of him being a "dullard" or asleep at the wheel. Eisboch Which has nothing to do with George W. Bush or Sarah Palin, who are dunces, and Rachel Maddow, who is not. There's nothing about Bush's academic background that impresses me. He got into Yale as a legacy and Harvard Biz because of family connections. He was a mediocre student and he is a mediocre intellect. Palin is intellectually lazy, and it shows. Maddow is very, very bright and it shows. The problem with your argument is that by denigrating Sarah Palin and George W Bush and their accomplishments you minimize any one else when they accomplish the same thing. Being a governor or president isn't an achievement of merit, hell Sarah Palin and George W Bush were Governors. And George W Bush was President. Barak H Obama hasn't done anything that a dunce off the street hadn't already accomplished. And, Bush a dunce had already attended an Ivy League school not much of an accomplishment Barak H Obama to do what a dunce has already done. Maddow is a radical partisan. The only thing interesting about here is that she is a fresh face in the crowd. Just looked up Maddow. She's kind of cute. Who is she dating? http://www.swsports.org/images/Pictures/tres-boobs.jpg A bit unusual but I could get used to it. ;-) |
#104
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
Don White wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... snip... After discussing this problem with them *they told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT*. While most doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post, the fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK. How would your wife & daughter know what Harry talks to his doctor about? Careful Waylon...your **** level is about to rise above your ears and dribble out in public. Opps, I made a typo. I meant to say "They told me that you *NEED* to to your doctor about Aricet. I am surprised that you believed my story about them being Dr. Dr.'s or my daughter working on her Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. degree. Nah, on 2nd thought, it doesn't surprise me. |
#105
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
|
#106
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
|
#107
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... snip... After discussing this problem with them *they told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT*. While most doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post, the fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK. How would your wife & daughter know what Harry talks to his doctor about? Careful Waylon...your **** level is about to rise above your ears and dribble out in public. Opps, I made a typo. I meant to say "They told me that you *NEED* *to to* your doctor about Aricet. I am surprised that you believed my story about them being Dr. Dr.'s or my daughter working on her Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. degree. Nah, on 2nd thought, it doesn't surprise me. Waylon..at least ease up on the booze on Sundays. Hee hee...*to to* indeed...... we don't need to discuss your casual attire here. |
#108
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
On Jan 11, 11:05*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: wrote: On Jan 11, 9:14 am, Jim wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: hk wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:08:16 -0500, Boater wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Obvious. *Then again, what would you expect from a guy who claims he was raped by a 16 year old girl when he was 12. I wish. She was only about a year or so older than I was. And I used the term "rape" facetiously. I was a willing victim. Harry, you are lying through your teeth. You bragged about her being 16 years old and you were only twelve. Willing or not, that is rape in this state - there is no such thing as concentual sex between underage children. It's statuatory rape - period, end of discussion. Honest to pete Harry - you can't even get your story straight. Use an index of some sort will you? Well, it was a long time ago. I remember the event, and being 12 or 13, and the gal being a year or so older. I do remember her name, though. It's consensual, by the way. I didn't complain. Despite the statutes. And I didn't get pregnant and have to drop out of high school. You may not remember her age today, because that is one of the problems with Alzheimer. *About a year ago, you were very emphatic about her being 16. I can imagine the 16 yr old who want to have sex with a 12 yr old. It is not a pretty sight. She must have been a real skank.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yup, like I tell my girls.. If a young adolescent guy or gal has to reach back a few years for a mate, there must be something wrong that kids their own age have figured out... She was either a skank, a total idiot, or grossly overweight... Maybe all three? Trust me, it never happened, anymore than Harry graduated from Yale. When I was in high school, even the skanks wanted to date junior and senior guys. *In my school, the administration strongly discouraged the parents of freshman girls from dating older boys, because they were too eager to please the older guys just so they could date them. *If you look at the physical and mental maturity of the average female and compare them to the physical and mental maturity of the average male, the females are at least 3 yrs ahead of the guys. Any 16 yr old girl who screwed a 12 yr old boy, would have serious physiological problems. *If Harry was a 16 yr old guy who bragged of screwing a 12 yr old girl, most people would be shocked that he would tell this story. *Yet, the average 12 yr old girl is more physically and mentally mature, than the average 12 yr old boy.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I know. I am just waiting for Harry to figure out how to set up a reader.. Hey, he changed out a hard drive once and has successfully installed windoze many times, now he has PhD in CNE... Which of course in his case means "Piled Higher and Deeper"... snerk |
#109
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
On Jan 11, 11:23*am, "Don White" wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in ... Don White wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message om... snip... * After discussing this problem with them *they told me you talk to your doctor about taking ARICEPT*. *While most doctors would never prescribe medication after reading a NG post, the fact that they have a Dr. Dr. degree they thought it was OK. * How would your wife & daughter know what Harry talks to his doctor about? Careful Waylon...your **** level is about to rise above your ears and dribble out in public. Opps, I made a typo. * I meant to say *"They told me that you *NEED* *to to* your doctor about Aricet. I am surprised that you believed my story about them being Dr. Dr.'s or my daughter working on her Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. degree. Nah, on 2nd thought, it doesn't surprise me. Waylon..at least ease up on the booze on Sundays. Hee hee...*to to* indeed...... we don't need to discuss your casual attire here.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Interesting you should mention this, you have as many typo's as anyone here. Donnie, like it or not, you don't come across as very well educated. Sorry... Maybe you thought you could survive on your kid's cage fighting career. |
#110
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
WTF is Jamesgang? Guess left wing drool is ok, typical...
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:01:25 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 11, 3:25*am, jps wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:35 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 10, 10:11*pm, hk wrote: BAR wrote: Sarah Palin, a strong woman who cranks out 5 kids, gets elected Mayor, gets elected Governor, and runs for Vice President of the US. And, she can shoot a moose, field dress it, and cook it all in the same day. Wow. She had five kids. Gee, what an accomplishment. Too bad she didn't leave herself enough time to properly instruct and raise them, eh? Her daughter is now a high school dropout. So was Thomas Edison. Do you have difficulty recognizing the gulf between Edison and Palin's relative intellects? That woman is dumb as a stump. *She's got charm and natural *political savvy (apart from the Hitler routine) but she couldn't think her way out of two sheets of newspaper. Thank you for your interjection. the comment was to be taken that even if you are a HS dropout (also, like Peter Jennings) you can still make something of your self. Of course, you didn't see it. Of course I did. Peter Jennings or Thomas Edison could have made something of themselves regardless of school. No one in the Palin family should leave school with less than a BA if they hope to earn a living via means other than tabloid fees. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In case you were wondering... | General | |||
Wondering? regarding O.T s | General | |||
Wondering how many | ASA | |||
Wondering at sea | ASA |