![]() |
More social engineering...
Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:07 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: What smart guy living in New Haven, CT would go to the Univ. of Kansas so he could get a quality Liberal Arts degree? Lawrence Kansas is a very nice town. I happen to think Kansas is a pretty decent school. I had an uncle on the faculty there. Dean of the law school, actually. Someone in CT might find it a bit distant. Casady Richard, If you lived in Kansas, and wanted a college education at a very reasonable price, Univ. of Kansas would be an option, but it would never be considered a Liberal Arts college. It is a State University. When you live in the NE, and you have some of the best liberal art colleges in the US within 150 miles, it is foolish to go to Univ. of Kansas and pay out of state tuition. While Univ. of Kansas has made great progress in the last 30 yrs in improving their University System, it still is not rated as a good Liberal Arts School. US News and World reports does not include Univ. of Kansas in their ranking of Top, 2nd tier, 3rd tier or 4th tier Liberal Art Schools. If your objective was to get a quality Liberal Arts education, you would never pick Univ. of Kansas, unless you lived in Kansas. Here are the listing according to US News Best Liberal Arts Schools: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...al-arts-search Best Value in Liberal Arts: http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...ts-best-values you can see the other rankings by clicking on the links in the left hand column. |
More social engineering...
hk wrote:
Killing a scab? A real scab? Someone hired after a strike began? What's wrong with that? :) Scabs are the lowest life form, lower even than neocon Republicans. Wow, you do have a very interesting value system. |
More social engineering...
On Jan 6, 11:28*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: hk wrote: Killing a scab? A real scab? Someone hired after a strike began? What's wrong with that? :) Scabs are the lowest life form, lower even than neocon Republicans. Wow, you do have a very interesting value system. Yeah, the guy was knifed on his front porch in front of his wife and two small children... He was not hired after the strike, he crossed the line during a unsanctioned "wildcat" strike and was followed home by union "persuaders"... |
More social engineering...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:07 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: What smart guy living in New Haven, CT would go to the Univ. of Kansas so he could get a quality Liberal Arts degree? Lawrence Kansas is a very nice town. I happen to think Kansas is a pretty decent school. I had an uncle on the faculty there. Dean of the law school, actually. Someone in CT might find it a bit distant. Casady I looked to see what Univ. of Kansas was ranked, and it is ranked 89th among National Universities with a score of 41 out of a 100. 92% of everyone who applied to Univ. Of Kansas were accepted. As a comparison, Columbia and the other Ivy League schools, who are known to be extremely selective, accept about 10% of their applicants. Since these schools are known to be very selective, only the best of the best even bother to apply and pay the $85 application fee. |
More social engineering...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:50:07 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: What smart guy living in New Haven, CT would go to the Univ. of Kansas so he could get a quality Liberal Arts degree? Lawrence Kansas is a very nice town. I happen to think Kansas is a pretty decent school. I had an uncle on the faculty there. Dean of the law school, actually. Someone in CT might find it a bit distant. Casady I looked to see what Univ. of Kansas was ranked, and it is ranked 89th among National Universities with a score of 41 out of a 100. 92% of everyone who applied to Univ. Of Kansas were accepted. As a comparison, Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Columbia, who are known to be extremely selective, accept about 10% of their applicants. Since these schools are known to be very selective, only the best of the best even bother to apply and pay the $85 application fee. |
More social engineering...
|
More social engineering...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:46:46 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... Why should I have to walk down the street for "atmospheric relief" because some inconsiderate fool is smoking like a chimney, stinking up the environment and exposing me to second-hand smoke? I've gotten off elevators because someone who had been smoking recently got on and made the elevator stink. I've gagged and had sneezing fits when I inhale certain perfumes. Hai Karate does it for me. My nose wrinkles a bit when I or someone else farts in a room. Well, that's not a problem I share. When I have a little flatulence, it smells like roses on a summer morning. I wither in disgust at some forms of music I hear blasting from cars. Rap - scrouge of the universe. I should ban rap in my official capacity as Universal Galactic Overlord. I find some posts in rec.boats to be disgustingly repulsive. It's a good damn thing we don't have any psychiatrists in here - we'd all be comitted eventually. I've learned to live with it. Here here. -- "An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." H.L. Mencken |
More social engineering...
On Jan 6, 10:54*am, hk wrote:
wrote: Nothing that exotic.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pfffttt. Tell it to the guys who bucked the union at Finast. They were sent through the Gauntlet and usually showed up 10-15 minutes late for lunch after having the **** beat out of them.. Grown men with families, pummeled in a box car. You can deny it all you want, I saw it with my own eyes... What were you drinking at the time?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gatoraid? *If you were a honorable man I would make a wager with you. There are still guys doing time for killing a scab on his front porch in front of his kids because he crossed a pickett line... But I know you are not up to an honest discussion so I will let the readers decide who they will believe here... Killing a scab? A real scab? Someone hired after a strike began? What's wrong with that? :) Scabs are the lowest life form, lower even than neocon Republicans.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And yet WAFA doesn't believe in the death penalty.....go figure.. |
More social engineering...
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:58:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Some years ago, I was at a breakfast meeting in Chicago with some of the officers of an international union. The exec veep lit up, and I said, "Jesus, Tommy, would you put out the f*cking cigarette or I'll puke in your eggs, and stop smoking before it kills you." That must have been quite a few years ago. Smoking at meetings, dinners, in public places went out by the 1990's either by law or by social pressure. I used to smoke like a chimney, but have cut back significantly in an attempt to stay healthy as long as I can. Hopefully this is the year I give it up entirely. I still smoke occasionally, but only in designated places even at my own house. If I have an itch for a butt on the boat, I go out in the cockpit area. If people are visiting that I know don't smoke, I don't smoke. We don't allow smoking in our house, but we don't forbid anyone from smoking anywhere outside. I think it should be a personal choice, not legislated. Long term smoking is a tough habit to kick and I admire people who have successfully done so completely. Success is gained by encouragement, not by condemnation or punishment. Eisboch When you get ready, let us know. I can tell you what helped me through. Which reminds me: This is to CERTIFY that: JOHN L. HERRING Has neither smoked nor puffed a single cigarette for: Seven years, one week, five days, 14 hours, 10 minutes and 15 seconds. This means he has not lit 128479 cigarettes, and has saved $20,877.92. The additional time he has to spend his daughters' inheritance is about: 1 year, 11 weeks, 5 days, 2 hours, and 35 minutes. ================== |
More social engineering...
On Jan 6, 9:20*am, hk wrote:
D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... D.Duck wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:37:05 -0500, hk wrote: Wrong, Lucky Strike breath. Lucky's are pretty good. *Do they still make them? Think I started with them and Camels. Graduated to the filtered, more aromatic blends. But any decent cigarette can mask the smell of boiled cabbage. --Vic It's an awful smell. I have no idea whether Lucky Strikes are still made. I do remember the ads. My guess is that smokers do not realize how badly they smell. The odor really permeates them. And some folks cannot tolerate the smell of perfume. And our hospitals are filled with people made ill by inhaling second-hand perfume odors. I didn't mention any heath hazards. *I mentioned people being annoyed.. I have to hold my breath when I walk *by the cosmetics department of any big department store.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Just too used to your miserable stench, huh, fat pig? |
More social engineering...
On Jan 6, 9:58*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Some years ago, I was at a breakfast meeting in Chicago *with some of the officers of an international union. The exec veep lit up, and I said, "Jesus, Tommy, would you put out the f*cking cigarette or I'll puke in your eggs, and stop smoking before it kills you." That must have been quite a few years ago. *Smoking at meetings, dinners, in public places went out by the 1990's either by law or by social pressure. I used to smoke like a chimney, but have cut back significantly in an attempt to stay healthy as long as I can. *Hopefully this is the year I give it up entirely. I still smoke occasionally, but only in designated places even at my own house. *If I have an itch for a butt on the boat, I go out in the cockpit area. *If people are visiting that I know don't smoke, I don't smoke. * We don't allow smoking in our house, but we don't forbid anyone from smoking anywhere outside. I think it should be a personal choice, not legislated. *Long term smoking is a tough habit to kick and I admire people who have successfully done so completely. *Success is gained by encouragement, not by condemnation or punishment. Eisboch I quit quite a few years ago. Funny thing is, still, even after what I'll bet is 7 or so, every once in awhile I still get the urge. I also have a friend who's wife smokes one cigarette daily, every evening when she gets home from work. I told her that if I only smoked one cigarette a day, I'd quit, and she said that believe it or not, she's just as addicted to that one cigarette as she was when she smoked a pack a day. |
More social engineering...
"hk" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 5, 11:14 pm, "Mike" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in messagenews:odi5m4l4462l2r3sp6agcs9bln3iltk5d9@4ax .com... On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:22:25 -0500, hk wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/business/06smoke.html Here's what I want to know: 5% of all deaths from diseases of the circulatory system are attributed to alcohol. I'm in favor of banning the growth and sale of all tobacco products. Thought you'd like to know that. Great - that's wonderful that you have an actual opinon on the subject of smoking. Now, how about the alcohol? -- "Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." Theodore Roosevelt. As Scott mentioned, harry's response had absolutely nothing to do with the thread you began. His rebuttal to your follow up, again had nothing to do with the thread. What does smoking have to do with booze? This is his M.O. in *every* thread. This will now grow to a long winded, flaming, personal attack thread. As is every other one that harry contributes to. Yes, I'm part of it, and I apologize. I will not respond to this thread again. Oh yeah, I notice that the only threads that don't get out of hand, are the ones that harry starts... no one responds. What a surprise. --Mike- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, just so you know.. The attack was aimed at Tom who is well known for enjoying a good cigar here and there.... You are right, it is his M.O... it has been for over a decade. Wrong, Lucky Strike breath. Tom posted a rant against alcohol because he is upset over cigar taxes. I simply responded in kind without belaboring it. Not everything fits into your simple-minded little world of black or white. I'm appalled by Tom's continued consumption of tobacco products. He's a smart guy and knows better. Nope, he is against social engineering via taxes and he has had a family member hurt / killed by a drunk driver. I am against the social engineering. What is next, the Big Mac tax? |
More social engineering...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/business/06smoke.html Here's what I want to know: 5% of all deaths from diseases of the circulatory system are attributed to alcohol. 15% of all deaths from diseases of the respiratory system are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all deaths from accidents caused by fire and flames are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all accidental drownings are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all suicides are attributed to alcohol. 40% of all deaths due to accidental falls are attributed to alcohol. 45% of all deaths in automobile accidents are attributed to alcohol. 60% of all homicides are attributed to alcohol. Why aren't we taxing the crap out of alcohol consumption? ANSWER ME HENRY WAXWORM!!! -- Have you ever bought booze up here? I have. What's your point? |
More social engineering...
CalifBill wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/business/06smoke.html Here's what I want to know: 5% of all deaths from diseases of the circulatory system are attributed to alcohol. 15% of all deaths from diseases of the respiratory system are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all deaths from accidents caused by fire and flames are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all accidental drownings are attributed to alcohol. 30% of all suicides are attributed to alcohol. 40% of all deaths due to accidental falls are attributed to alcohol. 45% of all deaths in automobile accidents are attributed to alcohol. 60% of all homicides are attributed to alcohol. Why aren't we taxing the crap out of alcohol consumption? ANSWER ME HENRY WAXWORM!!! -- "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." H. L. Mencken Ted Kennedy does not smoke. Obama does. |
More social engineering...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:31:38 -0500, hk wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:18:51 -0500, hk wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:22:25 -0500, hk wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/business/06smoke.html Here's what I want to know: 5% of all deaths from diseases of the circulatory system are attributed to alcohol. I'm in favor of banning the growth and sale of all tobacco products. Thought you'd like to know that. Great - that's wonderful that you have an actual opinon on the subject of smoking. Now, how about the alcohol? I'm not in favor of excessive drinking. I am in favor of criminal penalties for those who drink and drive. As in jail time...for the first offense. Not what I asked. Based on the personal and economic devastation wrought on the American public by excessive drinking of alcohol, are you in favor of increasing the taxes by triple or quadruple the amounts now taxed in the same manner as tobacco? Nope. I'm not opposed to a modest increase in taxes on alcohol, but I do think the taxes on tobacco products should at least double every year until they are so expensive no one can afford them. Most people who do enjoy a drink or two once in a while never become alcoholics, and modest drinking is not obnoxious to other people. I can absoutely prove to you that one or two is just as bad as ten or twelve. It's science baby. Smoking is obnoxious, period. So funking what. It's my freakin' life and I can do with it as I please. Or used to be able to anyway. You don't like my cigars, walk down the street. See if I care. The smell is awful and if you are exposed to a smoker, his cloud of effluent makes your clothes and hair stink as badly as his do. Sorry I am not as "consistent" as you would like, but I really believe smoking is the foulest of habits. No - the foulest of habits is telling other people how to live their lives. I agree with this post. |
More social engineering...
Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:53:51 -0500, hk wrote: Why should I have to walk down the street for "atmospheric relief" because some inconsiderate fool is smoking like a chimney, stinking up the environment and exposing me to second-hand smoke? I've gotten off elevators because someone who had been smoking recently got on and made the elevator stink. You're really sounding prissy here. How do you operate around union guys? Hope you don't get all huffy about them lighting up. --Vic He doesn't, Vic. That's all bull****. |
More social engineering...
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... None, not one of the union guys I know, smoke. Some did, but they gave it up a long time ago. There's no smoking at the union offices I visit downtown, because smoking is prohibited in DC offices. At one of the white collar union offices I visit, there's no smoking outside on the sidewalk, either, because the union president has made it known that anyone who smokes is on the schitt list. That figures. What about the guys that smoke on the way to to meeting? You can't convince me that none do. You have indicated that your nose is so superior that you can detect the aroma of a departed smoker in an elevator. Are you now saying you can't smell it on the clothing of a person sitting next to you? Better never arrange to meet Obama. Eisboch Actually, the smoker in the elevator is one of the soon to be departed. No, I cannot smell them after they have left the elevator...just while they are in it. Some years ago, I was at a breakfast meeting in Chicago with some of the officers of an international union. The exec veep lit up, and I said, "Jesus, Tommy, would you put out the f*cking cigarette or I'll puke in your eggs, and stop smoking before it kills you." Everyone burst out laughing. "Tommy" was the union's persuader. He put out the cigarette. That evening, at a reception-dinner, his wife planted a big kiss on my cheek and told me that I was the only one who had the balls to tell her husband to stop smoking. Sadly, Tommy had a stroke the next year and died. He was only 60. If I met Obama, I'd ask him if he had stopped smoking. It is a fair question and he is smart enough to know that people who care about him want him to stay healthy. I want him to serve two full terms in good health. Holy ****! Narcissistic overload! |
More social engineering...
Jim wrote:
hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... None, not one of the union guys I know, smoke. Some did, but they gave it up a long time ago. There's no smoking at the union offices I visit downtown, because smoking is prohibited in DC offices. At one of the white collar union offices I visit, there's no smoking outside on the sidewalk, either, because the union president has made it known that anyone who smokes is on the schitt list. That figures. What about the guys that smoke on the way to to meeting? You can't convince me that none do. You have indicated that your nose is so superior that you can detect the aroma of a departed smoker in an elevator. Are you now saying you can't smell it on the clothing of a person sitting next to you? Better never arrange to meet Obama. Eisboch Actually, the smoker in the elevator is one of the soon to be departed. No, I cannot smell them after they have left the elevator...just while they are in it. Some years ago, I was at a breakfast meeting in Chicago with some of the officers of an international union. The exec veep lit up, and I said, "Jesus, Tommy, would you put out the f*cking cigarette or I'll puke in your eggs, and stop smoking before it kills you." Everyone burst out laughing. "Tommy" was the union's persuader. He put out the cigarette. That evening, at a reception-dinner, his wife planted a big kiss on my cheek and told me that I was the only one who had the balls to tell her husband to stop smoking. Sadly, Tommy had a stroke the next year and died. He was only 60. If I met Obama, I'd ask him if he had stopped smoking. It is a fair question and he is smart enough to know that people who care about him want him to stay healthy. I want him to serve two full terms in good health. You are so brave. Tell me Harry. What is the job description of a union persuader. He's the hired thug. He checks job sites and intimidates the non-union family men. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com