On Jan 4, 2:53*pm, wrote:
On Jan 4, 1:09*pm, wrote:





On Jan 4, 12:54*pm, wrote:

On Jan 4, 12:48*pm, wrote:

On Jan 4, 12:23*pm, wrote:

On Jan 4, 10:51*am, John H wrote:

...who can watch all of this video?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c

I can take about 52 seconds.

How about this one?http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/b...hismtribal.htm

Remember, if you feel that Bush's verbal gaffs somehow disqualify him
for office or make him stupid, as it's evident that many (most?)
liberals do, then the same measuring stick must also apply to Caroline
Kennedy. *You can't undo 8 years of pointing it out and now claim it
doesn't apply. *She's stupid, too. *Or not... which is it?

Her "um's" and "ah's aren't the same as real, genuine dumb statements
such as
"We need an energy bill that encourages consumption."

Of course, that's not what he meant to say, the word would be
"conservation". *It's not a dumb statement, but rather a speech
impediment, a tic. *Very similar to repeatedly saying "ya know, ya
know, ya know".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, come now, you can't be trying to say that "consumption" came out
instead of conservation because of a speech impedement........

You don't really think that he *meant* to say "consumption", do you?
With his obvious history of using the wrong word or phrase, creating
the whole "bushism" thing? C'mon...