(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/


Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Dec 31, 1:47*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

in less time than that.But you have to wait until Jan. 20. But he's
probably got a running start on it already.

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:12:29 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 31, 1:47*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

in less time than that.But you have to wait until Jan. 20. But he's
probably got a running start on it already.

You say he's got the runs already? Hell, he's part of the problem then.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

wrote in message
...
On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

==================


I think Obama makes his doubters nervous and perhaps defensive because he
can speak English. He can correctly assemble plural and singular verbs &
nouns, something Bush had difficulty with. This makes Obama an elitist in
the eyes of his doubters, although these are the same people who also like
to complain about the "failed education system". When the "system" succeeds,
it produces elitists. The "system" just can't win. :-)

To understand this twisted way of thinking, you have to be from a certain
part of the country:

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1230822728

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

==================


I think Obama makes his doubters nervous and perhaps defensive because he
can speak English. He can correctly assemble plural and singular verbs &
nouns, something Bush had difficulty with. This makes Obama an elitist in
the eyes of his doubters, although these are the same people who also like
to complain about the "failed education system". When the "system" succeeds,
it produces elitists. The "system" just can't win. :-)

The only time Obama sounds polished is when he is reading the words from
a tele-prompter. Otherwise, he and Caroline Kennedy sound like a couple
of 12 year old girls in a junior high school hallway.

To understand this twisted way of thinking, you have to be from a certain
part of the country:

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c1...g?t=1230822728

"BAR" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)
http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/
Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

==================


I think Obama makes his doubters nervous and perhaps defensive because he
can speak English. He can correctly assemble plural and singular verbs &
nouns, something Bush had difficulty with. This makes Obama an elitist in
the eyes of his doubters, although these are the same people who also
like to complain about the "failed education system". When the "system"
succeeds, it produces elitists. The "system" just can't win. :-)

The only time Obama sounds polished is when he is reading the words from a
tele-prompter. Otherwise, he and Caroline Kennedy sound like a couple of
12 year old girls in a junior high school hallway.


Considering who you voted for in two previous elections, you are not very
well qualified to make that determination.

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.