"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax .com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.


If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:25:06 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:msppl49men4h7me41cpjvuid9dpcgol8v6@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4a x.com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in
no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already
concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in
office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking
us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been
told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not
read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in
news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I
might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country.
If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.


If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

John H


How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers came
from?

How is it possible that you don't know which country sent more foreign
fighters than any other into Iraq to kill our soldiers?

How is it possible that you don't know which country has repeatedly resisted
our efforts to get its ruling family to stop funding schools which train
lunatics to attack us?

How is it possible that you don't know which country's ruling family has
contributed to every presidential library in recent memory, in return for
special treatment?

Seriously. How? Have you been sleeping for the past 8 years?

On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:


How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers
came from?

New Jersey, or at least that's what their driver's license said. Besides
all the other troubles they wrought, getting a license in this state has
now become a real PITA.

wrote in message
t...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:


How is it possible that you don't know where most of the 9/11 attackers
came from?

New Jersey, or at least that's what their driver's license said. Besides
all the other troubles they wrought, getting a license in this state has
now become a real PITA.


Damn those terrorists! :-)

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

--
** Good Day! **

John H

On Jan 1, 11:54*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

*If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

--
** Good Day! **

* * John H

John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just
back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not
bothering with the likes of them...

wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

--
** Good Day! **

John H

John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just
back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not
bothering with the likes of them...

==========

Do you know the name of the country we're talking about?

On Jan 1, 12:41*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Jan 1, 11:54 am, John H wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:

If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

--
** Good Day! **

John H

John, these guys never have answers, only games and insults.. Just
back out till you get your answer and you will find yourself not
bothering with the likes of them...

==========

Do you know the name of the country we're talking about?

Saudi Arabia. Duh, now next time I ask a question you owe a straight
answer... pfffftttt...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:33:39 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

If answering the question I first posed would embarrass you, then I guess
we're done.

What part of that is difficult to understand?

--
** Good Day! **

John H


Clue: The country in question is in the Middle East.

Why can't you just say "I don't know the answer?"

Or: "I'm playing a game and I want to see YOU type the name of the
country."