"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:08:41 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:53:35 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
news:6inpl4dqaql6ds684kgn0ug14i91eieqs4@4ax. com...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

John H


The country which you think cannot be attacked because you've been told
they're our ally, and you actually believe that nonsense.


You're reading my mind now?

Which country would you have had him punish?

John H


With every passing day, I have less patience with people who do not read.
The information you need to participate in this discussion has been
available in your public library for at least 5 years, as well as in news
sources which target sentient adults. If you don't have this information
by
now, it's because you do not want to have this information. It would be
best
if you'd not participate in this discussion, since you do not have the
necessary information to do so.

If I see a thread about diagnosing a problem with a diesel engine, I might
read it, but I would not contribute to it because I know absolutely
nothing
about diagnosing diesel engine problems. You should do the same in this
discussion.


Again, which country, in your opinion, should Bush have 'punished'?

Try to just respond without all the smart-assed stuff.

John H


There are two possibilities at the moment:

1) You know the name of the country, but you're not revealing it. I won't
play that game.

2) You do NOT know the name of the country, in which case, see above,
"people who do not read".

There's only one way out of this, John. Tell me the name of the country. If
you don't know the name, we're all done here.

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country
go free.....


Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country
go free.....


Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."


I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:49:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:56:26 -0500, John H penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:17:53 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:04:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 31 2008, 2:47 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:25:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
(considering what hasn't changed here in this NG)

http://www.slate.com/id/2202423/pagenum/all/

Even though it was Bush's fault, Obama will have that fixed in no
time.
--
** Good Day! **

John H

Here's what I find odd. Seems that those who have already concluded
that Obama is a bad president, even though he hasn't been in office
yet, are the very same ones that didn't see that Bush would be a
miserable failure, and STILL don't see it.

Who has made conclusions that Obama will be a bad president?

Bush wasn't a miserable failure. His accomplishments in Iraq and
Afghanistan are remarkable. If it hadn't been for the Barney Frank
crowd,
he would have had a great economy going for him.
John H


Too bad he failed to punish the country responsible for attacking us.


What country would you have had him 'punish'?

15 of the 19 9/11 terrorists were from one country. That country,
to this day, broadcasts strong anti-American sentiment on their
government owned radio. That same government, having close ties to the
Bush administration, walked away from the mess, entirely unchallenged
by the US government for their role in the death of 3,000 Americans.
Their hands are just as dirty as Afghanistan's.

In addition, although this country has claimed to arrest Al Qaeda
operatives within their borders, I don't think any have been charged
(or accused) of having terrorist targets *outside* of that country's
borders.

Afghanistan makes sense, but why punish Iraq and then let this country
go free.....


Doubters will attempt to trash the source of this information. That will
be
funny to watch, as the doubters try and rain disrespect all over OUR
SOLDIERS, who uncovered the information about our so-called "allies", who
provided the majority of foreign fighters who came to kill our soldiers.

"The data come largely from a trove of documents and computers discovered
in
September, when American forces raided a tent camp in the desert near
Sinjar, close to the Syrian border. The raid's target was an insurgent
cell
believed to be responsible for smuggling the vast majority of foreign
fighters into Iraq. The most significant discovery was a collection of
biographical sketches that listed hometowns and other details for more
than
700 fighters brought into Iraq since August 2006."


I suppose, using your logic, we should wreak havoc on Mexico from whence
have come a whole passel of murderers, rapists, and other assorted felons.
--
** Good Day! **

John H


Based on YOUR logic, we should've attacked Peru in retaliation for Pearl
Harbor.