On Dec 29, 6:07*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Dec 29, 8:55*am, GC Boater wrote:





Harry, I'm revising the original wager (reproduced below). *Instead of
proving all three of your claims, you need to prove ONLY TWO. *All
three were stated by you as facts here on this newsgroup, so providing
proof for only two should be no problem. *How 'bout it Dude?

_________

Speaking of wagers, Harry, I remember an opportunity here a few years
ago that must have escaped your attention. *For your possible
benefit,
I’ll renew it myself as follows:

You have claimed on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical
doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman-
like lobster boat.

So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts
of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated
escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the
“reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to
a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win
the wager.

Hey Harry, what say Old Fella? *You could start the New Year off with
quite a windfall. *Maybe with $100K, Karen would let you put your name
on the deed of the house you're living in!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Old Fella, you playin' possum tonight?