They should


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm

Tim wrote:
They should


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm


And Dick Cheney should be in prison. There's just no justice.

On Dec 22, 10:01*pm, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote:
They should

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm

And Dick Cheney should be in prison. There's just no justice.

Dick Cheney? Is he an editor to the NYT?

Nah, I didn't think so.

But seeing you were quick to bypass the original question I'll ask
again:

"Will some heads at the NYT roll?

They should...."

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:01:31 -0500, Boater wrote:

Tim wrote:
They should


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm


And Dick Cheney should be in prison. There's just no justice.

No, he shouldn't. We've already been over that.

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
--


John



snerk

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:


And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!


yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)

Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.

If you're interested do some homework.

On Dec 23, 4:18*pm, Tim wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:56*am, Salmonbait wrote:



And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?

No, they are an arm of the DNC and thus have no accountability..

On Dec 22, 10:43*pm, Tim wrote:
They should

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm

But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. Amazing.