On Dec 23, 4:54*pm, Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:22:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Dec 22, 11:21 pm, wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:43 pm, Tim wrote:

They should
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7796700.stm
But the same media attacked Palin for momentarily believing that
someone calling into a radio talk show was the French President. *She
was on the spot, while the NYT had days to check on it and think about
it before publishing. *The liberal sheeple fell into lockstep behind
the image. *Amazing.

I couldn't believe it the other day. A couple of nurses were talking
about Michelle Obama who was being interviewed, but still quite under
wraps and not really saying anything... They said. "She is so open and
real". "She wears real cloths and is such a normal person", "Her kids
are so normal" Pfffftttt, they look like caged puppies for ****s
sake.... After hearing how folks got on Sarah for being a real person,
and actually shopping at real stores I almost puked.. Michelle Obama
clammed up totally during the election and was never seen without very
expensive gowns and dresses, dressed up like a Barbie doll. Amazing
how the lemmings can be so hypocritical.

My wife says that Mrs. Obama wears the same sorts of clothes to work
she does, and that they are not that pricey for a professional woman
who goes to the office every day.

Obama's kids are delightful little girls, and the older one already
looks like she is going to be America's #1 heartbreaker in a couple
of years. They are smart kids, reasonably well-behaved, and I feel
certain neither of them are going to embarrass their parents by being
public drunks or unmarried teen-aged mothers. I hope one of them
marries one of my grandsons.

That will never happen if either of them meets the grandson's
grandfather.
--

John

Jiggle, jiggle...oh...is that a fish on the line...awwww....it'sjust a
little herring.

Lets project a little further. When Mrs O sits down with Krause for the
dowry chat and leans forward to give ol' Harry that beady eyed evil
stare of hers, He'll wet his pants.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

She is a real hater, that's why she was kept so far from the media.
While we are at it, just like Caroline Kennedy who is also refusing to
answer questons until after she is appointed.. Talk about no
experience, oh wait, she wrote a couple of books and was in charge of
a well established org that raised funds... Just like it did before
she came in, and will long after she is gone... But I guarantee the
left will praise her, again, no moral core...

On Dec 23, 6:14*pm, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.

If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.

No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John

That's funny. You don't look Jewish.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Look Jewish?? Is that like the time the realestate agent told me "I'm
not prejudice, we *even* rent to black people"??? Krause is the
most prejudice person in the group save slammer....

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.

No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--

John


That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?

wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:14 pm, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:
And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.
Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.
No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John
That's funny. You don't look Jewish.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Look Jewish?? Is that like the time the realestate agent told me "I'm
not prejudice, we *even* rent to black people"??? Krause is the
most prejudice person in the group save slammer....

Whoooooosh.

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:14:18 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal, concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn sure isn't
a religous concept.

If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious' people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.

No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--

John


That's funny. You don't look Jewish.


I know.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.

No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--

John


That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?

You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.

wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.
No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John

That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?

You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.



Nah, the old line is "You don't look Druish".

from Mel Brooks's (A JEW) "Spaceballs" Now there a Jew we can all laugh at.

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:45:22 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.
No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John

That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?

You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.



Nah, the old line is "You don't look Druish".

from Mel Brooks's (A JEW) "Spaceballs" Now there a Jew we can all laugh at.

We have one here we all laugh at, but it has nothing to do with his faith.


--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John H

Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:45:22 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.
No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John
That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?
You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.


Nah, the old line is "You don't look Druish".

from Mel Brooks's (A JEW) "Spaceballs" Now there a Jew we can all laugh at.

We have one here we all laugh at, but it has nothing to do with his faith.


--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John H

Hey I hope all of you goys have a Fantastic Merry and Holy Christmas.

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:00:52 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:45:22 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:21:20 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:40:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:04:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:36:44 -0500, Salmonbait wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:11 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 23, 6:56 am, Salmonbait wrote:

And yes, some heads should roll at the NYT. But, they should
have rolled a
few years back.
--
John

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
yes, I feel they should, but do you think they will?
No. The NYT is a liberal rag. Liberals, from my experience, could
care less
about the truth. Remember, morals are a religious, not a legal,
concept.
Therefore integrity is not a trait valued by liberals or secular
progressives.

Actually, you could figure that out right here in the NG. ;)
Some of the most amoral creeps in time have been Popes. It damn
sure isn't
a religous concept.
If you're interested do some homework.
A religious concept isn't necessarily followed by 'religious'
people. Look
at Krause. He claims to be 'religious', but surely his faith doesn't
promote lying and name-calling.
Maybe it does.
No. Judaism doesn't condone such behavior.
--
John
That's funny. You don't look Jewish.



What does Jewish look like Krousie?
You nitwits need to get out in the world a litlle more. "Funny, you
don't look Jewish" is a VERY old and well worn comeback line. It pokes
fun at the notion of stereotypes. Frank Zappa helped popularize it for
younger generations.


Nah, the old line is "You don't look Druish".

from Mel Brooks's (A JEW) "Spaceballs" Now there a Jew we can all laugh at.

We have one here we all laugh at, but it has nothing to do with his faith.


--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John H

Hey I hope all of you goys have a Fantastic Merry and Holy Christmas.

And back at you and yours!
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John H