Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Watch as Tom meets a unsuspecting Herring....blasting along in a
clappped-out Wellcraft, looking the other way....what else..? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvXGodVxeR4 |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 19, 12:15*pm, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:55:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: Watch as Tom meets a unsuspecting Herring....blasting along in a clappped-out Wellcraft, looking the other way....what else..? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvXGodVxeR4 Clearly, the USCG was 98% at fault in that collision. I wonder what those nitwits didn't get about COLREGS Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8?????? *Rules 15 and 16 are all that one would need for conviction in a court of law. Rule 15 -- Crossing Situation * * When two power driven vessels are crossing so as to involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the way and shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other vessel. Rule 16 -- Action by Give-way Vessel * * Every vessel which is directed to keep out of the way of another vessel shall, so far as possible, take early and substantial action to keep well clear. Incredible! -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1170 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm -----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- Slammer doesn't really care about cause and affect. He just wants to be........slammer. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 19, 2:09*pm, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:41:45 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 19, 12:15*pm, Gene wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:55:36 -0800 (PST), wrote: Watch as Tom meets a unsuspecting Herring....blasting along in a clappped-out Wellcraft, looking the other way....what else..? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvXGodVxeR4 Clearly, the USCG was 98% at fault in that collision. I wonder what those nitwits didn't get about COLREGS Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8?????? *Rules 15 and 16 are all that one would need for conviction in a court of law. Rule 15 -- Crossing Situation * * When two power driven vessels are crossing so as to involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the way and shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other vessel. Rule 16 -- Action by Give-way Vessel * * Every vessel which is directed to keep out of the way of another vessel shall, so far as possible, take early and substantial action to keep well clear. Incredible! -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1170 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm -----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com-*Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- Slammer doesn't really care about cause and affect. He just wants to be........slammer. Maybe, but he did point out a real situation..... one that a lot of people might mis-interpret. While it is true that the crew of the stand-on vessel that was capsized failed to maintain an adequate watch. The coasties in the give-way vessel were guilty of violating about every rule in the book! "I didn't see him" would not, in the instance of the stand-on vessel, be much of a weak position. The give-way vessel was required, by law, to never put itself in a position of possible collision. A review of the rules is never a bad idea.....http://www.boatsafe.com/nauticalknow...g/colregs.html -- Forté Agent 5.00 Build 1170 "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." * - Unknown Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepagehttp://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm -----------------www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com- *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ------------------ Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree, rules are rules. There is also, in litigation and such a thing called Last Clear Chance for auto accidents. I'd bet the same for watercraft. It basically says that if you have a chance to avoid an accident, whether it's your fault or the other persons, you must take that action. Like if we were side by side on an interstate, you came over in my lane, there was nothing on the other side of me to prevent me from moving over to avoid the accident, and I didn't do it just because you were in the wrong. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 19, 2:09 pm, Gene wrote: Clearly, the USCG was 98% at fault in that collision. I wonder what those nitwits didn't get about COLREGS Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8?????? Rules 15 and 16 are all that one would need for conviction in a court of law. I agree, rules are rules. There is also, in litigation and such a thing called Last Clear Chance for auto accidents. I'd bet the same for watercraft. It basically says that if you have a chance to avoid an accident, whether it's your fault or the other persons, you must take that action. Like if we were side by side on an interstate, you came over in my lane, there was nothing on the other side of me to prevent me from moving over to avoid the accident, and I didn't do it just because you were in the wrong. -------------------------------- From what I could determine in the video, not only was the Coast Guard captain in violation of COLREGS, he/she (gotta be careful now-a-days) clearly did absolutely nothing to avoid a collision. Didn't even slow down, even though the smaller boat was in sight and being watched. Unreal. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Golfing with Herring and Tom | General | |||
Say, Herring... | General | |||
Ping: Herring | General | |||
Ping: Herring | General | |||
OT Herring | General |