Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:26 -0500, Jim wrote:
HK wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:03:47 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: BAR wrote: Why did anyone ever pay for AOL? The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL. The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS................... You and Harry make a great pair. Pick a religion and go for it. You are more than a bit over the edge this morning, Herring. Are you now accusing me of being anti-Semitic? I have nothing against Christianity, by the way, but I have no respect for assholes like you who claim to be Christians but whose behavior says otherwise. And your behavior is condoned by what religion? WAFA He seems to skip over that question. -- John |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:26 -0500, Jim wrote: HK wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:03:47 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: BAR wrote: Why did anyone ever pay for AOL? The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL. The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS................... You and Harry make a great pair. Pick a religion and go for it. You are more than a bit over the edge this morning, Herring. Are you now accusing me of being anti-Semitic? I have nothing against Christianity, by the way, but I have no respect for assholes like you who claim to be Christians but whose behavior says otherwise. And your behavior is condoned by what religion? WAFA He seems to skip over that question. Wow...someone quoted florida jim. I'll bet like you he claims to be a Christian, too, even though he behaves otherwise. What religion condones your behavior? |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 11, 10:58*pm, wrote:
On Dec 11, 10:54*pm, BAR wrote: Why did anyone ever pay for AOL? Mike wrote: Do people still pay for AOL? --Mike "Tim" wrote in message .... HA! AOL drops Usnet, photo hosting, and *now MAaffee.... Dear bschnautz, Recently we wrote to inform you that your subscription to McAfee® VirusScan® Plus - Special edition from AOL would no longer be a complimentary benefit of your membership. While your existing software will continue to operate normally until its license expires, we wanted to make sure your online security protection is not interrupted. We’ve negotiated a special price just for our members to upgrade to McAfee® Internet Security Suite - Special edition from AOL. If you upgrade now, you’ll pay only $34.99 -- a 13% discount off AOL’s already low annual rate and a full 50% discount off the regular retail price. Internet Security Suite provides our highest level of protection, with additional safeguards that aren’t included in your existing VirusScan Plus softwa Identity-theft protection that helps secure your personal information Tools to improve your computer’s health and performance Features to help shield your home network Though it’s packed with more advanced features, the Internet Security Suite looks and feels much like your current VirusScan Plus software, making it easy to set up and use. With more than 5,000 new online threats discovered every month, you should not let your computer’s security protection lapse. Upgrade before December 22, 2008 to take advantage of this special early upgrade pricing. Sincerely, AOL Member Services ©2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved. AOL and the AOL Triangle Logo are registered trademarks of AOL LLC. All other trademarks and/or registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Crap, it was in the 90's when I was building computers for Archetects and installing POS (point of sale) systems for business. I had a specific clause in the contract for service that if AOL was installed on the system, it voided the service contract completely... ![]() mother however kept it in her system till the day she died, I could not cancel her contract ![]() - Show quoted text - Way, WAY back I had an aol account. It took forever and a day to cancel that crap. I'm telling you, they make it almost impossible. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:12:21 -0500, BAR wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:41:33 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote: There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it. Heh - reminds me of a certain computer company executive who told me that email would never become a mass market feature for the home computer because the routing systems would be too complex, too expensive to build and besides, telephones were easier. Was this the profit himself, Edson? Actually no - although it wouldn't have surprised me if he didn't feel the same way. It was Ken Olsen. A member of the where are they now companies. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:12:21 -0500, BAR wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:41:33 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote: There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it. Heh - reminds me of a certain computer company executive who told me that email would never become a mass market feature for the home computer because the routing systems would be too complex, too expensive to build and besides, telephones were easier. Was this the profit himself, Edson? Actually no - although it wouldn't have surprised me if he didn't feel the same way. It was Ken Olsen. A member of the where are they now companies. Olsen is well-known. He may be a "was" but you are a never were and never will be. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote: There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it. It is a problem with most leaders in any industry, they become complacent and don't adapt well to changes. Bill Gates has stated for 15 yrs of so, that his biggest fear concerning Microsoft was that they would fail to adapt quickly in a rapidly changing marketing place. Large companies become like a supertanker, very difficult and slow when they want to change directions. The way they handled Vista is an example of this problem. I want MS to have strong and viable competition, but I would hate to see them go out of business. Millions of of long term Windows supporters have decide Mac is superior to Windows (including Harry. Vista's most vocal supporter). They are also willing to pay a substantial upcharge for a Mac, it highlights the real and perceived problems of Windows. If they don't' change their "bull in a china shop" approach to marketing, they will become another Prodigy, Compuserve and AOL. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 12, 11:11*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: wrote: On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: BAR wrote: Why did anyone ever pay for AOL? The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL. The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS................... We are more creative than that. *Only an Italian Mobster would make that mistake. * ![]() LOL.... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SURPRISED?: New report shows epidemic of shoddy illegal-alien-built homes hitting USA hard! | General |