On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:28:35 -0700, "RG" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/573jrz

That B&W of Antelope Canyon yours?

If so, I told you so. :)

By the way, there is one shot I'm highly suspicious of - the forest
image with the blueish tone and green leaves.

I've seen that one before - I know I have.

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:28:35 -0700, "RG" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/573jrz

That B&W of Antelope Canyon yours?

If so, I told you so. :)

By the way, there is one shot I'm highly suspicious of - the forest
image with the blueish tone and green leaves.

I've seen that one before - I know I have.

Hmmm. There's no B&W of Antelope Canyon . Although there is an outstanding
B&W of Monument Valley (post #54 by Jose Andres). It's simply amazing, but
for the life of I don't understand why he didn't either clone or crop out
the people standing in the lower right corner. It's a significant
distraction and it would have been such an easy fix.

I can't tell which post you're referring to re the forest image. Maybe you
could respond with either the post # or the poster's handle.

Mine are toward the end, at least for now. Others will follow as time goes
on. Posts 63-69, although they might get renumbered in time as some posts
are deleted. Posted by russg. You've already seen all of mine.

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:06:00 -0700, "RG" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:28:35 -0700, "RG" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/573jrz

That B&W of Antelope Canyon yours?

If so, I told you so. :)

By the way, there is one shot I'm highly suspicious of - the forest
image with the blueish tone and green leaves.

I've seen that one before - I know I have.

Hmmm. There's no B&W of Antelope Canyon . Although there is an outstanding
B&W of Monument Valley (post #54 by Jose Andres). It's simply amazing, but
for the life of I don't understand why he didn't either clone or crop out
the people standing in the lower right corner. It's a significant
distraction and it would have been such an easy fix.

http://images.nikonians.org/gallerie...thumbs/110.jpg

I can't tell which post you're referring to re the forest image. Maybe you
could respond with either the post # or the poster's handle.

http://images.nikonians.org/gallerie...p/photo/127132

Mine are toward the end, at least for now. Others will follow as time goes
on. Posts 63-69, although they might get renumbered in time as some posts
are deleted. Posted by russg. You've already seen all of mine.

Found them.

Great selection.

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:06:00 -0700, "RG" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:28:35 -0700, "RG" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/573jrz

That B&W of Antelope Canyon yours?

If so, I told you so. :)

By the way, there is one shot I'm highly suspicious of - the forest
image with the blueish tone and green leaves.

I've seen that one before - I know I have.

Hmmm. There's no B&W of Antelope Canyon . Although there is an
outstanding
B&W of Monument Valley (post #54 by Jose Andres). It's simply amazing,
but
for the life of I don't understand why he didn't either clone or crop out
the people standing in the lower right corner. It's a significant
distraction and it would have been such an easy fix.

http://images.nikonians.org/gallerie...thumbs/110.jpg

I'm not sure how you found that, but using the search engine, I found it as
well. That's a very nice rendition. Compare it to mine on page 99 of the
ebook. Same location, slightly different angle.





I can't tell which post you're referring to re the forest image. Maybe
you
could respond with either the post # or the poster's handle.

http://images.nikonians.org/gallerie...p/photo/127132

That's an interesting image. I t was posted in one of the earlier
challenges this year. I like the side lighting on the leaves. It's a nice
contrast to the purple ground cover.