![]() |
This should be good.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:13:28 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. Not to mention that the wind corridor that Pickens is proposing is right smack dab in the middle of the mid-America flyway for migrating birds. Wonder how he's going to get around that one. You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John H |
This should be good.
"JohnH" wrote in message ... You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? -- More likely DoDo birds that flock around golf courses. |
This should be good.
Don White wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message ... You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? -- More likely DoDo birds that flock around golf courses. Killing animals that annoy you is the Christian thing to do. |
This should be good.
"Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:04:54 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I was hoping for an honest, federal judge. We all are but that is a political patronage position. Why don't we put T Boone in charge and give all the auto makers wind turbine contracts to keep them busy until they figure out a car that people will buy. T. Boone is an interesting and entertaining nut. He's to be commended for his initiatives, but a lot of the wind has been taken out of his turbines since oil started dropping in price. I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. Eisboch Tree huggers... How very anti-environmental Republican of you. Thank you very much. Eisboch |
This should be good.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:02:08 -0500, JohnH
wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:13:28 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. Not to mention that the wind corridor that Pickens is proposing is right smack dab in the middle of the mid-America flyway for migrating birds. Wonder how he's going to get around that one. You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? Speaking of Canadian geese, I've always wondered why they call resident geese (meaning those that reside in the US) Canadian. Wouldn't you think that they would be called American Geese? Here's another thing. We have open season during November for resident Canadian Geese. Now as we all know, Canadian Geese, are migratory. How exactly am I supposed to tell when I aim at a Canadian goose if it's a resident goose or a migratory goose? Seriously - do the Canadian geese have a special license plate that says Hoser on it? Perhaps Oie canadienne? I mean seriously - what am I supposed to look for? |
This should be good.
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:02:08 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:13:28 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. Not to mention that the wind corridor that Pickens is proposing is right smack dab in the middle of the mid-America flyway for migrating birds. Wonder how he's going to get around that one. You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? Speaking of Canadian geese, I've always wondered why they call resident geese (meaning those that reside in the US) Canadian. Wouldn't you think that they would be called American Geese? Here's another thing. We have open season during November for resident Canadian Geese. Now as we all know, Canadian Geese, are migratory. How exactly am I supposed to tell when I aim at a Canadian goose if it's a resident goose or a migratory goose? Seriously - do the Canadian geese have a special license plate that says Hoser on it? Perhaps Oie canadienne? I mean seriously - what am I supposed to look for? The little tag on their butts that sez: "Only Big Brave White Hunters Shoot at Us Ferocious Geese." |
This should be good.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:32:59 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Here's another thing. We have open season during November for resident Canadian Geese. Now as we all know, Canadian Geese, are migratory. First off, they aren't Canadian Geese, they are Canada geese. Geez. ;-) Secondly, there are two populations of Canada geese, migratory and non- migratory. The resident geese are the ones that **** all over every patch of grass they can find. Third, you might want to check again on that season. Here in NJ, we have a resident season which is early, September, I think, before the migratory geese fly through. The bag limits are different, I believe, as the resident population is considered somewhat of a pest, but the migratory geese have been under some population stress. November sounds late for a resident season, but as I don't hunt anymore, I'm not sure. |
This should be good.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:32:59 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:02:08 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:13:28 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. Not to mention that the wind corridor that Pickens is proposing is right smack dab in the middle of the mid-America flyway for migrating birds. Wonder how he's going to get around that one. You mean they might kill some friggin' Canada geese? Where do I send money to put these things up? Speaking of Canadian geese, I've always wondered why they call resident geese (meaning those that reside in the US) Canadian. Wouldn't you think that they would be called American Geese? Here's another thing. We have open season during November for resident Canadian Geese. Now as we all know, Canadian Geese, are migratory. How exactly am I supposed to tell when I aim at a Canadian goose if it's a resident goose or a migratory goose? Seriously - do the Canadian geese have a special license plate that says Hoser on it? Perhaps Oie canadienne? I mean seriously - what am I supposed to look for? If they leave **** all over the ground, they're Canada geese. (Not, as I've been told by a Canadian, 'Canadian geese'.) Call these guys, and give them lots of money. http://www.canadagoosemanagement.com/ I think they're in cahoots with Al Gore. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John H |
This should be good.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:34:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
I have a theory about wind power. If it is implemented on a massive scale, the next thing we'll hear is that by capturing the energy of the wind, we are upsetting natural wind currents, screwing up seed distribution and contributing even more to global warming. Or cooling. Or whatever the tree huggers are promoting at the time. You know, in the quantum world, that is entirely possible. It's called The Theory of Universal Wave Function. For each action taken (or each event happening), there exits a Universe in which the action wasn't taken or the event didn't happen. We don't see it because we experience it - it's just a slight shift in reality. In theory, this may be the key to FTL travel as we could shift from our solar system to Omicron Persei 8 in the blink of an eye just by shifting our position from here to there - it's an orientation feature - a nearby universe shifting positionally so that Omicron Persei 8 is just a step away. Other than a shift in galactic position, we wouldn't know the difference because that universe is so close to ours that there is no practical difference. The one I favor is the Chaotic Inflation Theory - sometimes known as the Bubble Universe Theory in which the observable universe becomes too large to see meaning that it has to bud off at some point so we can maintain current reality - kind of like the way an ameoba duplicates itself. This is a never ending process because as it buds off, it is basically a replica of the original, only slightly smaller in space. Over time, slight changes get magnified, etc., etc., etc. Aren't you glad you brought this up? |
This should be good.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com