Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:33:18 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Ain't mailed it yet.


Are you sending me a "holiday spirit" package, too?

Do you want them sent to Karen's house?

Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote:

Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing
creatures but find fishing acceptable?


Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope is
"sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for sharks and
other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or most
other harmless creatures.

Sharks are edible, asshole.

Boater wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing
creatures but find fishing acceptable?

Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope
is "sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for
sharks and other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or
most other harmless creatures.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with *thinning* the herd. It's good
conservation. I don't condone the killing if the meat is wasted.

What isn't *harmless* about the creatures of lakes/sea that are fished
from the end of a line where the creature cannot see his enemy?

Seems a bit hypocritical to me.




My point about hunting and it has been the same for years is that it is
not sport, not in the way I would define sport. It's just semi-organized
slaughter of harmless animals.

The few times I have watched hunting shows on TV I've been astonished by
the "mystique" of the hosts, who think it is something miraculous to
stalk the woods, climb up into a tree, call in a male deer with scent or
sound, and then...shoot it. That's sport? Even worse are the brave white
hunters who stalk sheep. Sheep? Jesus.

Now, hunting with a longbow, that is something that requires lots of
skill and some balls, because you usually have to get close enough to an
animal to risk getting injured.

I've never claimed fishing was "manly," although fishing successfully
where you cannot see your potential catch does seem to require more
skill than looking through a scope and pulling a trigger. Fly fishing
requires a good deal of skill.

I don't fish very seriously these days. Sometimes I don't even bait my
hook.

That's just dumb. Join PETA and get lost, WAFA.

wrote:
On Dec 9, 11:41 am, Boater wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:25:23 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
Next year, you will be talking about the beauty and grace
of watching the deer walk through the forest on a foggy morning,
sighting the deer in your sights, and the feel of cold steel against
your cheek, and then slowly pulling the trigger, just so you can enjoy
the sight of blowing Bambi's brains all over the forest.
Bambi is vermin. They got one car of mine. Go for a country drive
around these parts, and you will see more deer than cats, rabbits,
coons, possoms, and skunks, combined. Lots of cars get roadkilled.
Casady
Well, when you intrude upon and destroy animal habitat, they tend to wander.

You own a home, right? Then you are as guilty as the next guy.

You do know he *doesn't* own a home, right?

Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:

I don't give a schitt
about you or your opinions or your cites. Frankly, our visiting
raccoons seem a higher life form than you.
According to the
Once again, I don't give a schitt about you, your opinions or your
cites.
I think something is wrong
Hey. if you want to continue behaving like an asshole, it's your business.
I suppose if I lived in a crappy townhouse in a crappy suburb of crappy
Hot-Lanta, I'd behave as you do.

Townhouse??
The way Waylon talks, I envisioned him as lord & master of a plantation
somewhat like 'Tara'.



Who the hell is Waylon? One of your cartoon friends again, dummy?

"D K" wrote in message
...

Who the hell is Waylon? One of your cartoon friends again, dummy?


Not too bright , are you?
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...e_smithers.htm

Saw your picture there also...
http://www.thesimpsons.com/bios/bios...ideshowbob.htm

"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)

What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

Don White wrote:
"D K" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?
Try email, dummy. It's more appropriate.

Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.




Shame on you, cavorting with Dickless Krueger... :)

On Dec 14, 10:42*pm, "Don White" wrote:


Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 10:42 pm, "Don White" wrote:


Try minding your own business asshole. That would be appropriate.

You just don't get this open internet group stuff, do you? You
shouldn't really be allowed on line. Do your family members know you
sit around all day making an idiot of yourself? Seems you only open
your mouth to change feet. Dim wit..

**************************************************
Time for you to light up another Georgia Golden Bud.
Don't worry, your buddy will send another 'care package' when your current
supply runs low.