Dudes...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:53:38 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

MR AHMAD OSMAN

Did you know that Ahmad Osman is an anagram for Ahs A Mad Mon and
Osman is an anagram of Mason? Ahmad is an anagram for ah dam.

So if we put the secret message all together, it's "Ahs A Mad dam ah
Mason Mon" meaning that you've been contacted by the Illumaniti and
the Tri Lateral Commission via the Masonic Temple in your state.

They have a secret mission for you.


Which, of course, brings us to this classic:

http://tinyurl.com/5zb92a

Dudes...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:




*Any* discussion in which humans go beyond faith to claim knowledge
of a supreme being is stupid.

That is based upon your firm belief today. Based upon your track
record of making 180 degree reversals in your core beliefs, I am sure
in the next few years, we will see you standing on a box in downtown
Washington DC or Baltimore preaching about your personal relationship
with the Lord, and passing out religious tracts. At that point
anyone who does not follow your form of religious beliefs will be
condemned to eternal damnation.


Yawn. Any chance in the next few years, you'll visit the wizard, get
some courage, and stop worrying so much that someone might figure out
who you are? (which, by the way, has already been done)

I was skimming over some of the other threads, are you know a brave
hunter who enjoys killing Bambi and thumper?




Are you know?

What language is that?

If you are asking if I hunt animals or shoot animals, the answer is no.

Dudes...
 

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:37:09 -0700, "RG" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:53:38 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

MR AHMAD OSMAN

Did you know that Ahmad Osman is an anagram for Ahs A Mad Mon and
Osman is an anagram of Mason? Ahmad is an anagram for ah dam.

So if we put the secret message all together, it's "Ahs A Mad dam ah
Mason Mon" meaning that you've been contacted by the Illumaniti and
the Tri Lateral Commission via the Masonic Temple in your state.

They have a secret mission for you.

Which, of course, brings us to this classic:

http://tinyurl.com/5zb92a

I-Zheet M'Drurz when I heard I-Zheet M'Drurz. :)

That was a funny skit.

Dudes...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:15:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:15:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

How will religious persons *know* if a supreme being exists? Does El
Supremo invite them over for coffee and cake? A religious person may
indeed have faith there is a supreme being, but that is all.

Ah well - you see, you can believe what you wish.

I KNOW a Supreme Being exists. For a fact.

Doesn't matter how I know - I know.

And it really doesn't matter what you think about that either.

This whole discussion is stupid.

Only to you mere mortals.

To me, being a diety myself not to mention Galactic Overlord, I find
it amusing.

I'll have to dig out my smiting handbook and smite a few of you to
keep you in line.

Let's get back to GM and unions.

NUKE GM!!!

And the UAW...

Nuke Ford and Chrysler while youse at it. Both sux on warrantee.

Dudes...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:14:35 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:33:18 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Ain't mailed it yet.

Are you sending me a "holiday spirit" package, too?

Heh, heh, heh...

Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .

Dudes...
 

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:




*Any* discussion in which humans go beyond faith to claim knowledge of
a supreme being is stupid.

That is based upon your firm belief today. Based upon your track
record of making 180 degree reversals in your core beliefs, I am sure
in the next few years, we will see you standing on a box in downtown
Washington DC or Baltimore preaching about your personal relationship
with the Lord, and passing out religious tracts. At that point anyone
who does not follow your form of religious beliefs will be condemned to
eternal damnation.


Yawn. Any chance in the next few years, you'll visit the wizard, get
some courage, and stop worrying so much that someone might figure out
who you are? (which, by the way, has already been done)

I was skimming over some of the other threads, are you know a brave
hunter who enjoys killing Bambi and thumper?




Are you know?


Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing creatures but
find fishing acceptable?

What language is that?

If you are asking if I hunt animals or shoot animals, the answer is no.

Dudes...
 

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:44:47 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:15:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:15:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

How will religious persons *know* if a supreme being exists? Does El
Supremo invite them over for coffee and cake? A religious person may
indeed have faith there is a supreme being, but that is all.

Ah well - you see, you can believe what you wish.

I KNOW a Supreme Being exists. For a fact.

Doesn't matter how I know - I know.

And it really doesn't matter what you think about that either.

This whole discussion is stupid.

Only to you mere mortals.

To me, being a diety myself not to mention Galactic Overlord, I find
it amusing.

I'll have to dig out my smiting handbook and smite a few of you to
keep you in line.

Let's get back to GM and unions.

NUKE GM!!!

And the UAW...

Nuke Ford and Chrysler while youse at it. Both sux on warrantee.

Oh really?

Ford put two new brand new, non-reman engines in my F-150, a new cat
system, new rear end and a transmission not to mention changed the EMM
all in an effort to get the beast to tow 5000 lbs like they claimed.
One of the results of all this work was a vacuum hose slipped off the
vacuum pump causing the brake system to fail (fortunately in a parking
lot) requiring a replacement hose (a silent recall) and they paid the
$567 tow bill no questions asked.

All the drive train work at no cost to me.

And I have never, EVER, had a warranty issue in terms of payment - if
it's covered, it's payed for - I don't even see the bill.

Oh, one other thing. The dealer is outstanding. The oil change
before this last one, I asked them to check the brakes as I thought
the front ones were looking a little worn when they rotated the tires.
Said they wre fine. Well, they weren't because one week later, I
heard grinding noises, knew the brakes were bad and they replaced the
rotors, calipers and brakes - no charge.

Don't tell me about Ford - wouldn't buy any other car. And I would
remind you that Ford may just make it through this as our only
domestic, all American auto manufacturer.

Ever.

Dudes...
 

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:48:19 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:14:35 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:33:18 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:52:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

I am not a religious person, but if you think about it, you have this
all backwards. Someone who is religious will KNOW if a supreme being
does exist, yet someone who isn't religious might not know even if a
supreme being does exist.
And that would be me and I do, indeed exist.

Also, keep tabs on your email for the next few days - something will
be enroute shortly.

Moron. :)
What about that 'package' you sent up to me?
Did you lash it to a donkey and point it towards the border?

Ain't mailed it yet.

Are you sending me a "holiday spirit" package, too?

Heh, heh, heh...

Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .Tick . . .

Oh - no ticking.

Silent. Like the night.

Get it? Silent? Night? Silent Night?

Dudes...
 

D.Duck wrote:

Why do you have such disdain for folks that hunt air breathing creatures but
find fishing acceptable?


Because I can. I don't think stalking animals in the woods, and then
shooting them from 200 yards away with a high-powered rifle and scope is
"sport." I'm also disgusted these days by those who fish for sharks and
other mostly inedible pelagics for the "sport" of it.

There's absolutely nothing "manly" about shooting deer or doves or most
other harmless creatures.

Dudes...
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:44:47 -0800, "Calif Bill"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:15:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:15:08 -0500, Boater
wrote:

How will religious persons *know* if a supreme being exists? Does El
Supremo invite them over for coffee and cake? A religious person may
indeed have faith there is a supreme being, but that is all.
Ah well - you see, you can believe what you wish.

I KNOW a Supreme Being exists. For a fact.

Doesn't matter how I know - I know.

And it really doesn't matter what you think about that either.
This whole discussion is stupid.
Only to you mere mortals.

To me, being a diety myself not to mention Galactic Overlord, I find
it amusing.

I'll have to dig out my smiting handbook and smite a few of you to
keep you in line.

Let's get back to GM and unions.
NUKE GM!!!

And the UAW...
Nuke Ford and Chrysler while youse at it. Both sux on warrantee.

Oh really?

Ford put two new brand new, non-reman engines in my F-150, a new cat
system, new rear end and a transmission not to mention changed the EMM
all in an effort to get the beast to tow 5000 lbs like they claimed.
One of the results of all this work was a vacuum hose slipped off the
vacuum pump causing the brake system to fail (fortunately in a parking
lot) requiring a replacement hose (a silent recall) and they paid the
$567 tow bill no questions asked.

All the drive train work at no cost to me.

And I have never, EVER, had a warranty issue in terms of payment - if
it's covered, it's payed for - I don't even see the bill.

Oh, one other thing. The dealer is outstanding. The oil change
before this last one, I asked them to check the brakes as I thought
the front ones were looking a little worn when they rotated the tires.
Said they wre fine. Well, they weren't because one week later, I
heard grinding noises, knew the brakes were bad and they replaced the
rotors, calipers and brakes - no charge.

Don't tell me about Ford - wouldn't buy any other car. And I would
remind you that Ford may just make it through this as our only
domestic, all American auto manufacturer.

I love my F-150 SuperCrew. I even smashed up the right front. The guy
who fixed it was a freaking genius with frames and bodies. The owner of
the shop is an idiot but they guy who actually did the work is excellent.

Oh, it doesn't eat tires after the "incident".