![]() |
Best camera for light use?
Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera.
This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. |
Best camera for light use?
On Nov 28, 9:12*am, "Don White" wrote:
Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting *on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS *compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years *vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. Most of the shots and vids for that matter he http://www.rowdymouseracing.com were taken with one of these: http://www.kodak.com/global/en/servi...path=3921/1141 Not quite a "purse" camera with it's cube shape. but easy to hole and control, nice German lens, and big zoom.... Does me fine for just recording history.. |
Best camera for light use?
Don White wrote:
Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. Either one of those are good. My wife has a Canon A710, which has been replaced by one with a slightly higher number. It is a fantastic little camera. You want optical zoom on those, not digital. The Nikon D40 is fine, but you are right...they go obsolete...about every year. :) |
Best camera for light use?
Don White wrote:
Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. The D40 is a great simple to use camera, that can be used in it's auto settings or allow you to manually adjust all settings. It is light weight and you and your wife will absolutely be pleased with the quality. As far as the "obsolete" factor. The digital cameras will only be obsolete, if you want the new and improved features of the newer improved digital cameras. If you are pleased with the camera, you can expect over 100,000 photos from the D40. A digital camera will have an expectant average life similar to the average film cameras. |
Best camera for light use?
Boater wrote:
Don White wrote: Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. Either one of those are good. My wife has a Canon A710, which has been replaced by one with a slightly higher number. It is a fantastic little camera. You want optical zoom on those, not digital. The Nikon D40 is fine, but you are right...they go obsolete...about every year. :) You are using the term obsolete, to mean that it is not the latest and greatest camera in it's category. Except for minor cleaning and re-setting the camera to specs, the average digital camera is good for about 100,000 exposures before it is time to trash it. My guess is Don will never take 100,000 exposures. As long as he is happy with the quality of his photos, the D40 will have a longer life than Don. ;) |
Best camera for light use?
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. The D40 is a great simple to use camera, that can be used in it's auto settings or allow you to manually adjust all settings. It is light weight and you and your wife will absolutely be pleased with the quality. As far as the "obsolete" factor. The digital cameras will only be obsolete, if you want the new and improved features of the newer improved digital cameras. If you are pleased with the camera, you can expect over 100,000 photos from the D40. A digital camera will have an expectant average life similar to the average film cameras. Just curious. What is the *wear out* mechanism in a digital camera? |
Best camera for light use?
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote: Don White wrote: Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. Either one of those are good. My wife has a Canon A710, which has been replaced by one with a slightly higher number. It is a fantastic little camera. You want optical zoom on those, not digital. The Nikon D40 is fine, but you are right...they go obsolete...about every year. :) You are using the term obsolete, to mean that it is not the latest and greatest camera in it's category. Except for minor cleaning and re-setting the camera to specs, the average digital camera is good for about 100,000 exposures before it is time to trash it. My guess is Don will never take 100,000 exposures. As long as he is happy with the quality of his photos, the D40 will have a longer life than Don. ;) My favorite camera is older than you are, I'm guessing. 35mm rangefinder, from the mid to late 1950s. |
Best camera for light use?
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. The D40 is a great simple to use camera, that can be used in it's auto settings or allow you to manually adjust all settings. It is light weight and you and your wife will absolutely be pleased with the quality. As far as the "obsolete" factor. The digital cameras will only be obsolete, if you want the new and improved features of the newer improved digital cameras. If you are pleased with the camera, you can expect over 100,000 photos from the D40. A digital camera will have an expectant average life similar to the average film cameras. The big thing about the SLRs vs the compact cameras is the size of the processer. I saw an illustration where the D40s processor looked like a 35mm slide compared to an old 110 frame equaling a compact. Dramatic difference! Another concern...I really like to control shutter speed, F stop and focus manually. ( re my Minolta SRT200 manual film SLR) I'll have to go to a real camera store and find out what the Canon compacts can do. |
Best camera for light use?
On Nov 28, 8:12*am, "Don White" wrote:
Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting *on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS *compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years *vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. "Best camera for light use?" What else. 35mm disposables. That's about as light of use as you can get. |
Best camera for light use?
"Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote in message ... Don White wrote: Wife wants to upgrade from my 3 yr old HP R707 compact digital camera. This camera works fine...although the original battery doesn't seem to hold its charge as long anymore while sitting on the shelf. Costco just happens to have a super price $270.00 CDN for its popular Canon A650 IS compact. I also see the Nikon D40 on sale here with lens at just under $500.00. I can't justify the higher end SLRs...especially when they seem be be somewhat obsolete every three or four years vs the old manual film SLRs that were still fine after 20-25 years .My usage these days is more snapshot than trying to be artistic...although I do like to do justice to scenery. The D40 is a great simple to use camera, that can be used in it's auto settings or allow you to manually adjust all settings. It is light weight and you and your wife will absolutely be pleased with the quality. As far as the "obsolete" factor. The digital cameras will only be obsolete, if you want the new and improved features of the newer improved digital cameras. If you are pleased with the camera, you can expect over 100,000 photos from the D40. A digital camera will have an expectant average life similar to the average film cameras. Just curious. What is the *wear out* mechanism in a digital camera? The shutter and mirror mechanisms are a problem with both digital and film. It needs to flip up to take the photo, but not allow any light through when it is in the down position. They can lock up or lose there ability to close completely and not allow any light to pass through. My wife had an old film camera that the foam around the mirror (to block the light in the down position), dried up and needed to be replaced. It was not worth the expense to repair. With Digital cameras your image sensor can burn out or get enough bad pixels that you will want to replace them, but I have never heard anyone who replaced a camera due to this problem. Thanks. That's just about what I was thinking. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com