Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 5:18*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 25, 4:24 pm, Boater wrote: The Pentagon said the change was consistent with Congress' intent when it passed a "wounded warrior" law in January. That would be the Democratically-controlled Congress, right? *Uh-huh. Liberal trash. No, that would mean the REpublican controlled pentagon interpreted the regulations in a way to screw the vets. Nice try. Sheet suit back from the laundry? How simple of you to think that GW has somehow forced the military leaders to do this. GW is the boogy-man under your bed, isn't he?The Joint Chiefs and Sec of Defense would have something to say about this, especially during a lame duck period. Besides, BO must not have a problem with it, since he's keeping the same Sec of Defense, huh? Besides, the Dims can fix this if they want to. Let's see what they do. Sheet suit? Post a pic of yours so we can all see what one looks like. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What to do with an injured canoe? | General | |||
Sage Combat Advice | General | |||
No, No, No! It FLEW OVER THE PENTAGON was The Pentagon Fraud Explained In Simple Terms | ASA |