Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The incoming Dems say they dont really know what to do about the
economy so their strategy is to simply throw money into holes in the ground. Unfrigginbelievable. I have never had ANY classes in business or economiocs yet I know EXACTLY what to do, its obvious. Executive order that all mortgages must have at least 5% down. Executive order to eliminate transfers of mortgages to the rest of the economy (they must be held by a loan company or bank). Executive order to take over the big 3 auto pension plans paying the employees 75 cents on the dollar for what they would have gotten with no cost of living adjustments. If they bitch about, offer em 60 cents on the dollar and so on till that problem is solved. Arrange the big 3 to go into Chapter 11 bankruptcy allowing them to dump union contracts. When they emerge from bankruptcy and if the unions threaten anyone or prevent anyone from working, hit them with RICO. DO NOT SPEND 700 billion dollars. Problem solved. Wont happen. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:03:50 -0800, Frogwatch wrote:
Executive order that all mortgages must have at least 5% down. Executive order to eliminate transfers of mortgages to the rest of the economy (they must be held by a loan company or bank). Executive order to take over the big 3 auto pension plans paying the employees 75 cents on the dollar for what they would have gotten with no cost of living adjustments. If they bitch about, offer em 60 cents on the dollar and so on till that problem is solved. Except Congress is the only Constitutional power with the ability to *make* law. Executive orders are to clarify existing law. For instance, the first one you propose, the President might be able to order Fanni and Freddi, but not all the mortgage holders. The other two you propose, would need to go to Congress, and even then, would most likely be unconstitutional. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 12:42 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:03:50 -0800, Frogwatch wrote: Executive order that all mortgages must have at least 5% down. Executive order to eliminate transfers of mortgages to the rest of the economy (they must be held by a loan company or bank). Executive order to take over the big 3 auto pension plans paying the employees 75 cents on the dollar for what they would have gotten with no cost of living adjustments. If they bitch about, offer em 60 cents on the dollar and so on till that problem is solved. Except Congress is the only Constitutional power with the ability to *make* law. Executive orders are to clarify existing law. For instance, the first one you propose, the President might be able to order Fanni and Freddi, but not all the mortgage holders. The other two you propose, would need to go to Congress, and even then, would most likely be unconstitutional. True enough. However, perhaps this would buy some time to get our "do nothing right" Dem congress to actually do the right things. This will not ahppen because Pelosi, Reid, Frank and Dodd have a vested interest in doing the wrong things. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 12:42 pm, wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:03:50 -0800, Frogwatch wrote: Executive order that all mortgages must have at least 5% down. Executive order to eliminate transfers of mortgages to the rest of the economy (they must be held by a loan company or bank). Executive order to take over the big 3 auto pension plans paying the employees 75 cents on the dollar for what they would have gotten with no cost of living adjustments. If they bitch about, offer em 60 cents on the dollar and so on till that problem is solved. Except Congress is the only Constitutional power with the ability to *make* law. Executive orders are to clarify existing law. For instance, the first one you propose, the President might be able to order Fanni and Freddi, but not all the mortgage holders. The other two you propose, would need to go to Congress, and even then, would most likely be unconstitutional. True enough. However, perhaps this would buy some time to get our "do nothing right" Dem congress to actually do the right things. This will not ahppen because Pelosi, Reid, Frank and Dodd have a vested interest in doing the wrong things. Related subject: Recently heard some disturbing news. Of the "renegotiated mortgages" done to ease the pain in the past 3 months, 50 per cent of them are now in default again. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No brainer! | ASA |