On topic photos...
 

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:00:58 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:16:11 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:
Oh, Donnie, glad you stepped in.

Did *you* find anything negative or derogatory I've said about Harry's
wife? Or your mother, for that matter?

My wife is over sixty, and I'm for damn sure not ashamed of her. If you
three want to take pot shots at her, that's fine. Help yourself.
Perhaps you should stop talking about the relatives of others, else they
start talking about your relatives.

Well, it's for sure I'll never compliment your wife again!
Why don't you just not discuss the relatives of posters here, unless
they ask you to, schitt for brains?

It must cause you a great deal of inner turmoil to see your wife get a
compliment when you don't. A way to keep her from getting compliments is to
not post photos and claim she took them.

As for discussing relatives, Harry, you've 'dissed' my wife, my daughters,
and my grandkids. I've never done the same to any of your relatives.

Harry, do you know what a weasel is? Or a Christmas Goose?


A weasel? That would be you.

On topic photos...
 

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Harry, you are so friggin' perfect that you're a joke.

Well, I was smart enough not to get drafted. You weren't. And
aren't.

Now you've done it Krause. You have crossed the line. Your insults
won't go unrewarded.
BTW I found your connection to Yale. Turns out your high school
was once on the campus of Yale. It had to be moved off campus due
to expansion. Perhaps you were duped into thinking you attended
Yale. Eh?


Sorry, bozo, the high school *I* attended was never located
anywhere other than where it was when I went there. There was a
previous high school with the same name as my high school, but *it*
was demolished before I was of high school age, to make room for
the later construction of two residential colleges at Yale.

Actually, there were two high schools on that old site, the one
mine was named after, and a technical-vocational high school.

You are about as adept a "research" as Loogy the Idiot.

So, what were you doing when you got drafted?



Did you notice that he has given up on his story about graduating
from Yale?


snicker

You really are delusional.
My father did grad from Yale, I do have access to all alum. You are
no Yale grad.


Sure, Mr. No-Balls Anonymous.

Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information about
me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything he knows. In
fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.

On topic photos...
 

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:47:12 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:

Harry, you posted a picture of a hotel in Utah which, you said, was taken
by your wife. It was a very nice picture. Much better than any I've seen
from you, except for the owls.

I complimented your wife's photo. Perhaps you're looking a little too hard
to find fault.

Unless, of course, your wife didn't take it in the first place. That would
put a different light on things, I suppose.


My suggestion was that you avoid mentioning my wife and I would not
mention yours.

It must cause you a great deal of inner turmoil to see your wife get a
compliment when you don't. A way to keep her from getting compliments is to
not post photos and claim she took them.

As for discussing relatives, Harry, you've 'dissed' my wife, my daughters,
and my grandkids. I've never done the same to any of your relatives.

--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"

On topic photos...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information about
me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything he knows. In
fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into this
newsgroup.

On topic photos...
 

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information about
me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything he knows.
In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into this
newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really do
seem infatuated with me.

On topic photos...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information
about me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything he
knows. In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into this
newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really do
seem infatuated with me.


It's always fun to tweak a coward like you. I don't expect you to
answer. But since you are always commenting on the lives, choices,
personal info, et cetera, of others, and are too much of a pussy to
disclose your info, it helps demonstrate what a piece of **** you are.

Got it?

On topic photos...
 

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information
about me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything he
knows. In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into
this newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really do
seem infatuated with me.


It's always fun to tweak a coward like you. I don't expect you to
answer. But since you are always commenting on the lives, choices,
personal info, et cetera, of others, and are too much of a pussy to
disclose your info, it helps demonstrate what a piece of **** you are.

Got it?

No, it just seems that you are jealous of the fact that I don't have to
fabricate a fictional Walter Mitty existence. If you want to discuss
this further, give me a call.

On topic photos...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information
about me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything
he knows. In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into
this newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really do
seem infatuated with me.


It's always fun to tweak a coward like you. I don't expect you to
answer. But since you are always commenting on the lives, choices,
personal info, et cetera, of others, and are too much of a pussy to
disclose your info, it helps demonstrate what a piece of **** you are.

Got it?

No, it just seems that you are jealous of the fact that I don't have to
fabricate a fictional Walter Mitty existence. If you want to discuss
this further, give me a call.


Your analysis is wrong. You're just a snarky coward. Why would I want to
have a phone conversation with a turd like you?

On topic photos...
 

Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information
about me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything
he knows. In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into
this newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really
do seem infatuated with me.


It's always fun to tweak a coward like you. I don't expect you to
answer. But since you are always commenting on the lives, choices,
personal info, et cetera, of others, and are too much of a pussy to
disclose your info, it helps demonstrate what a piece of **** you are.

Got it?

No, it just seems that you are jealous of the fact that I don't have
to fabricate a fictional Walter Mitty existence. If you want to
discuss this further, give me a call.


Your analysis is wrong.


You are probably correct. You just enjoy your fictional Walter Mitty
existence no matter how successful I am.

On topic photos...
 

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:


Harry,
You told me that one of your buddies had all kind of information
about me.. Tell him I gave him permission to tell you everything
he knows. In fact, he can publish it in rec.boats.


Once again, Reggie, I am not interested in your ejaculations into
this newsgroup.

Then why do you always ask me for personal information, and get so
****ed off when I don't provide exactly what you want? You really
do seem infatuated with me.


It's always fun to tweak a coward like you. I don't expect you to
answer. But since you are always commenting on the lives, choices,
personal info, et cetera, of others, and are too much of a pussy to
disclose your info, it helps demonstrate what a piece of **** you are.

Got it?

No, it just seems that you are jealous of the fact that I don't have
to fabricate a fictional Walter Mitty existence. If you want to
discuss this further, give me a call.


Your analysis is wrong.


You are probably correct. You just enjoy your fictional Walter Mitty
existence no matter how successful I am.


Successful? You? You are a cowardly turd. How's your "Doral36" altered ego?