On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than 50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %

Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.

So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than 50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %
Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.
So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?


I'm guessing you don't make more than $5 million a year.

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than
50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %
Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.
So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?


I'm guessing you don't make more than $5 million a year.



So, does that mean that in the new, revised Obama plan he gets a tax break?

Eisboch

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:26:27 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than
50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %
Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.
So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?


I'm guessing you don't make more than $5 million a year.

So, does that mean that in the new, revised Obama plan he gets a tax break?

Yeah - what happened to the $250K thing? Or the immediate repeal of
the "Bush" tax plan?

Enquiring minds want to know. :)

On Nov 24, 8:19*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:26:27 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message
...
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than
50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %
Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. *The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.
So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?

I'm guessing you don't make more than $5 million a year.

So, does that mean that in the new, revised Obama plan he gets a tax break?

Yeah - what happened to the $250K thing? *Or the immediate repeal of
the "Bush" tax plan?

Enquiring minds want to know. *:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Those were things he said while he was running for Pres.. If you go
back and read or see what he said for decades before that, you would
have known it was a bunch of bull****, and the lazy and ignorant
bought it because the media did not do it's job.. or just plain
covered up for him...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...

Yeah - what happened to the $250K thing? Or the immediate repeal of
the "Bush" tax plan?

Enquiring minds want to know. :)


It's the morning after an evening of partying and imbibing. He's now
starting to realize all the stupid things he said the night before.

Seriously, Obama, like McCain, was handed an 11th hour campaign surprise,
starting on or about Sept. 15th.
It probably cost McCain the election and is now causing Obama, along with
his advisors to have to rethink the whole plan and promises he made.

Eisboch

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less
than 50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %
Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.
So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?


I'm guessing you don't make more than $5 million a year.

I'm guessing you don't even own a house.

Click here --- 0 to play again.

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:24:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:42:33 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"tak" wrote in message
...
http://americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx

See how you do, elected officals, who took the quiz, scored less than
50%

That was cool.

I did ok, surprisingly.

ou answered 27 out of 33 correctly - 81.82 %

Two of them were completely bogus - two correct answers in the same
question. The one about the First Admendment (correct answer includes
due process) and the taxation question which is totally FUBAR - taxes
equals government spending also means zero debt and growth.

30 out of thirty two and IN FACT, I nailed it.

Morons.

So...why aren't you famous

Among my peers, I have quite the reputation as an original thinker and
brilliant theoritician.

or rich?

How do you know I'm not?


After what you said about your investments, I'm tempted to send my modest
funds down for you to invest.
I pay Nesbitt Burns fees for handling my money and every statement I get is
smaller than the last.
I think they're more interested in calming the masses to avoid panic
selloffs rather than my best interests.