"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ

I wonder who funded this study.

Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could
have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat
Somalian Pirates.

Eisboch


Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who
has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and
aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the
other two boys.

Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've
spewed today!


They could take you along for ballast.

...or bait.........

Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ

I wonder who funded this study.

Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could
have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat
Somalian Pirates.

Eisboch

Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who
has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and
aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the
other two boys.
Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've
spewed today!

They could take you along for ballast.

..or bait.........




There must be regulations against fish poisoning...

On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote:

* November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ

You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.

i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....

oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.

sorry...my mistake.

Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems....

wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote:

November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ
You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.
i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....

oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.

sorry...my mistake.

Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems....


Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto
plant.

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:15:47 -0500, Boater wrote:

Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ

I wonder who funded this study.

Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could
have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat
Somalian Pirates.

Eisboch

Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who
has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and
aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the
other two boys.
Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've
spewed today!

They could take you along for ballast.

..or bait.........




There must be regulations against fish poisoning...

Please send Donnie a 'Thank You' card! At least he's nice to you.

--
John H.

On Nov 19, 1:23*pm, wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote:





On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote:

* November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ

You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.

i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....

oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.

sorry...my mistake.

Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry,

actually it was.

it was paulson who proposed it.

it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it

it was bush who told the congress that we needed it.

so, yeah, it was the GOP.


then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems

sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife.
they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top

everyone else washes windows

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:32:42 -0800 (PST), wf3h
wrote:



actually it was.

it was paulson who proposed it.

it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it

it was bush who told the congress that we needed it.

so, yeah, it was the GOP.


then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems

sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife.
they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top

everyone else washes windows

Whoa. I though most window-washers were illegal aliens.
Everybody else can do landscaping......whoa.

--Vic

On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote:

* November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ
You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.
i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....

oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.

sorry...my mistake.

Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems....

Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto
plant.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, I was a hourly Port Fuel Injection specialist.. Sorry to expose
another one of your bull**** lies...

On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote:

* November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ
You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.
i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....

oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.

sorry...my mistake.

Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems....

Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto
plant.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door,
hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt..

wrote:
On Nov 19, 1:26 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote:
November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses
WSJ
You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their
mistresses.
i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can
continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with
tax dollars....
oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'.
sorry...my mistake.
Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700
billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and
monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe
it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto
unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't
make sense.. cause it was the dems....
Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto
plant.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door,
hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt..


What are you raving about? If I'm home and the doorbell rings, I answer
it. I do check the security camera first, to see if I need to answer the
door "heeled." :)