"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.


Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH we joined 'at the lip'.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.


Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.


ooops... better make that *were*

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
.. .

"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.


Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.


ooops... better make that *were*


I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.

But, we all know better. Right???
--
John H.

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*


I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.

But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:39:34 -0500, Boater wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*


I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.

But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

Now Harry. Don't be upset 'cause I trashed your political thread. It
shouldn't be here anyway.

Rough time in the mirror this morning?

K.Liesallthetime Marylandus - You gotta love it! I had to add it to my
spell checker. Soon it will be in everyone's spell checker.
--
John H.

Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*

I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.
But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

If John would concede to go on a short boat ride on your boat, would you
get off his back?

On Nov 19, 8:32*am, Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*

I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.
But, we all know better. Right???

Have you always been a crashing bore?

If John would concede to go on a short boat ride on your boat, would you
get off his back?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Make it the lobster boat!!!

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:32:17 -0500, Jim wrote:

Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*

I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.
But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

If John would concede to go on a short boat ride on your boat, would you
get off his back?

Did he get a 400'er?
--
John H.

Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*

I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed
desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.
But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

If John would concede to go on a short boat ride on your boat, would you
get off his back?


Only if he tied a 12" concrete block to a rope, tied that rope to his
ankles, and then jumped overboard. :)

Boater wrote:
Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:57:03 -0400, "Don White"

wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...

No! He stalked JimH? Musta been before they became joined at the
hip.

Or before you & JohnnyPreparationH *we* joined 'at the lip'.

ooops... better make that *were*

I think that's called a Freudian slip. It indicates a repressed
desire to
be 'joined at the lips' with JimH.
But, we all know better. Right???


Have you always been a crashing bore?

If John would concede to go on a short boat ride on your boat, would
you get off his back?


Only if he tied a 12" concrete block to a rope, tied that rope to his
ankles, and then jumped overboard. :)

I guess you haven't resolved your anger issues yet. You need more therapy.