On Nov 16, 6:30*pm, Boater wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:31:40 -0800 (PST), camacdonaldiii
wrote:

On Nov 15, 10:22 pm, "Don White" wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

How's that lawsuit coming? ~~ Snerk ~~
Better be careful, the statute of limitations must be almost up.
Hey Donnie, you must be pretty ignorant of the law here. *The statute
within this jurisdiction is three years. *Apparently Krausie didn't
vote, as the process server was at his polling place. *So the
scintillating Democratic activist who gives talks to party loyalist as
far away as San Diego didn't even vote!
This is as wild as anything Krause has ever made up. A process server
waited at the polls from when it opened to when it closed to make $75
trying to serve somebody? Yeah, right.

Maybe Harry used an absentee ballot. Lots of people do that, even if
they would have no problem getting to the polls.

Or maybe you made this up as a companion pievce to your imaginary
lawsuit.

Tweet!

Really, what a joke. *They wouldn't have let the process server hang around
inside the polls so he'd have to recognize Harry from a photo while waiting
outside for 12 hours.

Around here, he wouldn't have gotten within 100 feet of the polls. We
have laws against electioneering or any other non-voting activities
within 100 feet of the polls. There are enough uniformed local and state
police in line to vote at any particular time that anyone violating the
rules would be "invited" to leave.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bull****. As long as it has nothing to do with the elections, a person
can stand there all day if they want.