Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Installing second Depth sounder
I wish to install a 2nd depth sounder.
I have a Raytheon ST60 series sounder and a Navman 450 combo paddle-wheel log and depth. The Raytheon is already in use but I wish to install the Navman depth transducer as a backup and a check. It also will measure greater depths than the Raytheon which sometimes comes up with shallow depths in turbulent water - when the chart says 3,000 metres. I don't want to adjust its sensitivity. Questions - Will there be interference to either or do both filter out through being different wave lengths or somesuch? How far apart do they have to be? What else haven't I thought of? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Peter Hendra wrote:
I wish to install a 2nd depth sounder. I have a Raytheon ST60 series sounder and a Navman 450 combo paddle-wheel log and depth. The Raytheon is already in use but I wish to install the Navman depth transducer as a backup and a check. It also will measure greater depths than the Raytheon which sometimes comes up with shallow depths in turbulent water - when the chart says 3,000 metres. I don't want to adjust its sensitivity. Questions - Will there be interference to either or do both filter out through being different wave lengths or somesuch? How far apart do they have to be? What else haven't I thought of? You're right in the raymarine depth sensor not being much good in deep water; mine craps out at about 150-160m (guess it's about 500 feet that's the real limit) and the behaviour at the boundary is not very good. It can take a while for it to register "LAST" instead of "DEPTH". -- Kees |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If both sounders use the same frequency, which they probably will, then yes
they will interfere with each other. A sounder works by measuring the time it takes for the signal to travel from the transducer to the bottom and back. If two sounders are operating at the same frequency they have no way of determining which signals return they are receiving. "Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... I wish to install a 2nd depth sounder. I have a Raytheon ST60 series sounder and a Navman 450 combo paddle-wheel log and depth. The Raytheon is already in use but I wish to install the Navman depth transducer as a backup and a check. It also will measure greater depths than the Raytheon which sometimes comes up with shallow depths in turbulent water - when the chart says 3,000 metres. I don't want to adjust its sensitivity. Questions - Will there be interference to either or do both filter out through being different wave lengths or somesuch? How far apart do they have to be? What else haven't I thought of? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"BrianR" wrote in message ... If both sounders use the same frequency, which they probably will, then yes they will interfere with each other. A sounder works by measuring the time it takes for the signal to travel from the transducer to the bottom and back. If two sounders are operating at the same frequency they have no way of determining which signals return they are receiving. If that was the case wouldn't you expect to see interference when sailing in close proximity to other vessels with echo sounders running? I never saw any sign of this |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"MGP" . wrote in message ... "BrianR" wrote in message ... If both sounders use the same frequency, which they probably will, then yes they will interfere with each other. A sounder works by measuring the time it takes for the signal to travel from the transducer to the bottom and back. If two sounders are operating at the same frequency they have no way of determining which signals return they are receiving. If that was the case wouldn't you expect to see interference when sailing in close proximity to other vessels with echo sounders running? I never saw any sign of this A quick review of the physics involved: + speed of sound in water is roughly 1493m/s in fresh water and 1533m/s in sea water + round trip time for "interesting" depths ( 100m) is less than 150ms + the energy of the echo obeys an inverse square law, so the return is much weaker than the signal generated by the transducer Taken together, this means the sounder operates in pulse mode so as not to drown out the echo and that pulses must be at least 150ms apart to allow for the round-trip time even in shallow water. For the example earlier in this thread of 3km charted depth, round trip time is of the order of 4 seconds. To make the transmitted pulse as efficient as possible (both equipment power wise and snr), a short duration, high amplitude is required. For sake of argument, assuming a 5ms pulse, this gives a maximum duty cycle of the transmitter of about 3% for 100m and 0.13% for km. At this point it begins to become clear that the interference problem postulated above would require the sounders on nearby boats (or multiple sounders on a single boat) to be both in phase and using the same pulse rate if the sounders are using any form of signal processing (e.g. averaging successive readings and/or range gating). As the maximum depth resolution of the sounder increases, the duty cycle decrease further reduces the probability of collision. Additional refinements ala CSMA (carrier sense multiple access) are left as an exercise to the reader. I have personally experimentally verified non-interference in shallow (10m) fresh water operating a Raymarine ST-60 tridata and a Humminbird ID 120 with transducers located within 2m of each other on the same boat. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have a 50/200, another 50/200 and a 120 (Khz units). The 120
(digital depth) rarely gets interference but the 50/200s are VIDEO units and I will see significantly more screen clutter when they are operated at the same frequency. It won't change the digital readouts on them but it will make the digital depth unlock and not display the number. Bottom still shows pretty clearly as a line on the display. J. Michael Milner wrote: "MGP" . wrote in message ... "BrianR" wrote in message . .. If both sounders use the same frequency, which they probably will, then yes they will interfere with each other. A sounder works by measuring the time it takes for the signal to travel from the transducer to the bottom and back. If two sounders are operating at the same frequency they have no way of determining which signals return they are receiving. If that was the case wouldn't you expect to see interference when sailing in close proximity to other vessels with echo sounders running? I never saw any sign of this A quick review of the physics involved: + speed of sound in water is roughly 1493m/s in fresh water and 1533m/s in sea water + round trip time for "interesting" depths ( 100m) is less than 150ms + the energy of the echo obeys an inverse square law, so the return is much weaker than the signal generated by the transducer Taken together, this means the sounder operates in pulse mode so as not to drown out the echo and that pulses must be at least 150ms apart to allow for the round-trip time even in shallow water. For the example earlier in this thread of 3km charted depth, round trip time is of the order of 4 seconds. To make the transmitted pulse as efficient as possible (both equipment power wise and snr), a short duration, high amplitude is required. For sake of argument, assuming a 5ms pulse, this gives a maximum duty cycle of the transmitter of about 3% for 100m and 0.13% for km. At this point it begins to become clear that the interference problem postulated above would require the sounders on nearby boats (or multiple sounders on a single boat) to be both in phase and using the same pulse rate if the sounders are using any form of signal processing (e.g. averaging successive readings and/or range gating). As the maximum depth resolution of the sounder increases, the duty cycle decrease further reduces the probability of collision. Additional refinements ala CSMA (carrier sense multiple access) are left as an exercise to the reader. I have personally experimentally verified non-interference in shallow (10m) fresh water operating a Raymarine ST-60 tridata and a Humminbird ID 120 with transducers located within 2m of each other on the same boat. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have an ST50 and an old B&G Hornet depth sounder in my boat and they don't
seem to interfere with each other. The transducers are less than 12 inches apart. The B&G is just a backup that I would use in case the ST50 died. Even if interference were occuring, in this case it would not be an issue. Perhaps you are in the same position. "Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... I wish to install a 2nd depth sounder. I have a Raytheon ST60 series sounder and a Navman 450 combo paddle-wheel log and depth. The Raytheon is already in use but I wish to install the Navman depth transducer as a backup and a check. It also will measure greater depths than the Raytheon which sometimes comes up with shallow depths in turbulent water - when the chart says 3,000 metres. I don't want to adjust its sensitivity. Questions - Will there be interference to either or do both filter out through being different wave lengths or somesuch? How far apart do they have to be? What else haven't I thought of? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Gordon Wedman" wrote in
news:XrWAe.150070$on1.146205@clgrps13: I have an ST50 and an old B&G Hornet depth sounder in my boat and they don't seem to interfere with each other. The transducers are less than 12 inches apart. The B&G is just a backup that I would use in case the ST50 died. Even if interference were occuring, in this case it would not be an issue. Perhaps you are in the same position. We run a B&G Network Depth instrument about 6" from a Garmin 185's sonar transducer, too, aboard "Lionheart". Doesn't seem to both it at all....until the damned bubbles when the sailing is good get under the Garmin's transducer and set off its depth warning alarm.... -- Larry This jerk called my cellphone and was nasty. Continental Warranty -- MCG Enterprises -- Mepco- 24955 Pacific Coast HWY Suite C303 Malibu California 90265 888-244-0925 Fax: 310-456-8844 Email: Read about them he http://www.ripoffreport.com/view.asp...3&view=printer |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Depth sounder project | Electronics | |||
Depth sounder transducer question | Cruising | |||
FS: NEW Raymarine depth sounder / fishfinder for sale with no reserve on eBay in Maryland | Marketplace | |||
SR Mariner Depth Sounder | Cruising | |||
NASA Depth sounder help | Electronics |