LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Meindert Sprang
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
...
"Tony MS" wrote in
:

http://www.thomasknauf.de/seatalk.htm


Thank you for the link. I didn't have that one....

Don'tcha just love it when they invert the data and try to obscure
everything just so noone's proprietary equipment will talk to each other
without paying extra for inter-operability punishments.


Coincidentally this is not the reason with Raymarine. First of all, there's
no paying involved because Ray keeps the protocol to themselves. But, for a
very good reason: they claim that their equipment is safe and that you can
rely on it, no matter what. The moment they allow someone else on "their"
Seatalk bus, they cannot hold that claim anymore because they're dependent
on someone elses reliability. You wouldn't believe the amount of testing
they did on my multiplexers in order to become an approved supplier to them.

Meindert


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Garmin 176 interface to Raymarine ST60, Seatalk. DWB Electronics 4 May 3rd 04 05:18 PM
FS: NEW Raymarine depth sounder / fishfinder for sale with no reserve on eBay in Maryland Peter Kennedy Marketplace 0 March 13th 04 03:27 PM
SeaTalk update rate Frank Electronics 7 February 2nd 04 07:00 PM
Raymarine A/P and Seatalk Failire Glenn Ashmore Electronics 7 September 16th 03 04:11 PM
Raymarine vs. Navman Spd., Dpth, Wind Package drewr3737atnowhere Electronics 3 September 16th 03 03:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017