| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
... "Tony MS" wrote in : http://www.thomasknauf.de/seatalk.htm Thank you for the link. I didn't have that one.... Don'tcha just love it when they invert the data and try to obscure everything just so noone's proprietary equipment will talk to each other without paying extra for inter-operability punishments. Coincidentally this is not the reason with Raymarine. First of all, there's no paying involved because Ray keeps the protocol to themselves. But, for a very good reason: they claim that their equipment is safe and that you can rely on it, no matter what. The moment they allow someone else on "their" Seatalk bus, they cannot hold that claim anymore because they're dependent on someone elses reliability. You wouldn't believe the amount of testing they did on my multiplexers in order to become an approved supplier to them. Meindert |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Garmin 176 interface to Raymarine ST60, Seatalk. | Electronics | |||
| FS: NEW Raymarine depth sounder / fishfinder for sale with no reserve on eBay in Maryland | Marketplace | |||
| SeaTalk update rate | Electronics | |||
| Raymarine A/P and Seatalk Failire | Electronics | |||
| Raymarine vs. Navman Spd., Dpth, Wind Package | Electronics | |||