Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In article , chuck
wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... -- add a 2 before @ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Bruce,
Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hello again Bruce,
Just a quick clarification of my post of a minute ago. It is Icom who sells these open radios for use on marine frequencies. If they are not type accepted, is Icom in violation of FCC rules? Thanks. Chuck chuck wrote: Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It is interesting that the SG-2000 is type accepted and is "open"
yet an "open" ICOM is not. I don't really believe this is true. Doug, k3qt s/v CAllista "chuck" wrote in message ... Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Doug,
The Icom M710 (since 2002) and the M802 both have the ham bands as standard. krj Doug Dotson wrote: It is interesting that the SG-2000 is type accepted and is "open" yet an "open" ICOM is not. I don't really believe this is true. Doug, k3qt s/v CAllista "chuck" wrote in message ... Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In the case of ICOM, I suspect that was a marketing move and a
good one. Paying an extra $200 for the ham enabled version was silly, especially since the method of enabling the ham bands was just a simple software upload. The cloning cable was simple to make and the required software became generally available for nothing. Doug, k3qt s/v Callista "krj" wrote in message ... Doug, The Icom M710 (since 2002) and the M802 both have the ham bands as standard. krj Doug Dotson wrote: It is interesting that the SG-2000 is type accepted and is "open" yet an "open" ICOM is not. I don't really believe this is true. Doug, k3qt s/v CAllista "chuck" wrote in message ... Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
But it is type accepted for both marine and ham.
krj Doug Dotson wrote: In the case of ICOM, I suspect that was a marketing move and a good one. Paying an extra $200 for the ham enabled version was silly, especially since the method of enabling the ham bands was just a simple software upload. The cloning cable was simple to make and the required software became generally available for nothing. Doug, k3qt s/v Callista "krj" wrote in message ... Doug, The Icom M710 (since 2002) and the M802 both have the ham bands as standard. krj Doug Dotson wrote: It is interesting that the SG-2000 is type accepted and is "open" yet an "open" ICOM is not. I don't really believe this is true. Doug, k3qt s/v CAllista "chuck" wrote in message ... Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
krj wrote: But it is type accepted for both marine and ham. krj Ham Radios are NOT Type Accepted. They just need to be in compliance with 47CFRPart 15, like all other RF Radiation Sources. That is to say Ham Radios, but Ham Radio Amplifiers in the MF/HF Range MUST be Type Accepted to be sold in the USA. Bruce in Alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote: It is interesting that the SG-2000 is type accepted and is "open" yet an "open" ICOM is not. I don't really believe this is true. Doug, k3qt s/v CAllista "chuck" wrote in message ... Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... You can believe anything that you want, but the facts are against you. Me |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article , chuck
wrote: Hello Bruce, Don't mean to be picking but I'd like to be very clear on this. Are you saying that all of the owners of "open" Icom "type accepted" radios who operate these radios on marine frequencies are operating illegally because the radios are "open"? Are you certain that the type acceptance does not include an open version? Is the SGC 2000 being sold in violation of the law then? Appreciate the info, Bruce. Regards, Chuck Bruce in Alaska wrote: In article , chuck wrote: We probably need a more carefully worded statement of just what type acceptance means in this regard (VFOs). Or are you suggesting that "open" versions of the type-accepted marine radios are no longer type-accepted? Regards, Chuck Yes I am stating that as a "Fact", that "opened" versions of "Type Accepted" Radios are not still Type Accepted. The owner, or operator, is not allowed to change ANY Major Operational Charactoristic of a "Type Accepted" radio and still have a "Valid Claim" of Type Acceptance. This is so stated in the FCC's Rules that detail what is allowed and what spec's are required to meet "Type Acceptance" by the FCC Chief Engineer, and his Lab. Just doing the required testing of a radio, takes a couple of months, for MF/HF SSB Radios, and that doesn't include any Modifications required to get the radio into compliance. Been there, Done that, and it AIN't EASY........ Bruce in alaska who has worked BOTH sides of this issue...... Lets make this very clear. The SGC-2000 IS Type Accepted and therefor can be used legally in both the Marine and Ham Radio Services, as long as it is UNMODIFIED from the original factory configuration. Any other Marine Radio that is Type Accepted can be used in Marine or Ham Radio Service, as long as it is UNMODIFIED from it's original factory configuration. If a Marine Radio that is Type Accepted is then subsequently MODIFIED by anyone other than the OEM, it is NOT considered Type Accepted any longer, by the FCC, as it is now MODIFIED, and therefor must go thru the Type Acceptance Procedure again to qualify for Type Acceptance. Any MODIFICATION to the radio that changes it's basic configuration or Operating Charactoristics would invalidate the Type Acceptance for that radio. "Opening" a radio is considered such a MODIFACTION, as it requires one to actually take the covers off and change something mechanically inside the radio, itself, thus altering the FACTORY OEM Configuration. There are ways around this Type Acceptace modifacation issue. Mostly it is thru Undocumented Control Features that are built in to the User Interface that "open" the radio without any MODIFICATION to it. The SEA Radios all have a "TEST Mode" that is entered into via a Special Key Sequence from the front panel. This is allowable, as the Test Mode is not a MODIFICATION of the radio, but an "Undocumented Feature" as the radio is still in "FACTORY" OEM condition. There, NOW that should be VERY Clear for anyone who can read, and comprehend, the King's English. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |