Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote: I don't know the actual answer to this, but it seems to me that the CG has clustered its monitoring stations for HF/MF along the coasts. What is the rationale behind this? It pretty much limits comms to groundwave in the covered areas. It would seems that a few stations spread out around the country would vastly expand coverage via skywave. Is it because the CG is limited in it's jusisdiction and can't establish stations inland? One of the advantages of using the ham bands is that station are stread out all over the world. At any given time day or night some station either via groundwave or skywave is going to be listening. Doug, k3qt s/v Callista It is because the USCG only deals with "Certain" Comms capability, so any skywave comms which depend on what the E and F layers are doing and what the GeoMagnetic Index is at the moment, aren't figured in. That is also why MF was basically given up as a Maritime Comms System when the switch to SSB from AM happened, by the USCG. Oh, the "Official Line" is that they have a 24/7 Watch on 2812 Khz, but in the REAL World, and not Jack's Universe, Most of those MF Receivers have the volume turn down, because the Operators can't deal with the white noise, when trying to hear something on one of the HF Receivers. Been that way for MANY years, even if Jack doesn't acknowledge it. Some of the best FCC Maritime Monitoring that was ever done was from the old Grand Island, Nebraska, Station....... Me |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wrapping ssb antenna on kevlar backstay | Electronics | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics | |||
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF | Electronics |