Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics,uk.rec.sailing,rec.boats.cruising,sci.geo.satellite-nav
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ronald Raygun wrote:
Terje Mathisen"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no" wrote: d^2 = (R+h)^2 - R^2 = 2Rh + h^2 = 2Rh(1 + h/R) Actually 2Rh(1 + h/2R) but that's OK. where for small angles (hR) the h/R term can be dropped and we get I believe that h/2R term is significantly smaller than the normal atmospheric effects, i.e. today I can see features on the other side of the Oslo fjord that I know should be below the horizon. :-) d = sqrt(2Rh). Under small angle conditions the straight-line eye distance and curved foot-distance can be treated as equal. With a height of 6 feet we get about 3.5 miles, right? Wrong :-) Oops! Doing sqrt(3) ~= 1.7321 or so, from memory, and then multiplying by 2 instead of sqrt(2) ~= 1.4142 gave a pretty bad end result. sqrt(6) should be close to 2.45, since 25^2 is 625 and 24^2 is 576. Thanks for catching my error. The ratio of 1.8 m to 6400 km is about 3.5e6, so the second-order term requires 13 digits while most calculators are happy to show 8 or 10, right? Quite. -- - Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Cruising | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Electronics | |||
May a "landlubber" comment? - was[ Help create better charts] | Electronics |