| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote
Doug Dotson wrote: ..... Personally, I think the code should stay. I am a bit worried about the bands going the way of CB ... I would like to see the writtens get a lot tougher .... It's inevatable because of technology. One had to know Morse to be a ham "back when", not because of FCC rules but because it was the only reliable way to communicate. The rules merely reflected that technical reality. That is no longer true today so requiring Morse makes about as much sense as requiring visitors to Yellowstone Park to demo proficiency with flint and steel before being allowed to see Old Faithful. The same goes for the electronic part of the written tests. It was essential for hams to know enough to stay out of trouble when everybody built their own rigs, but that day is long gone. Everybody is an "appliance ham" because it is too expensive to home brew. This means that written tests should emphasize good operating techniques which means a lot of rote memorization. You don't "understand" band limits in the same way we had to "understand" how vacuum tubes and transistors worked - you just memorize them. In a way, that makes the tests harder. I didn't need to study before aceing my general exam 'cuz I could already draw Hartley and Colpitts oscillators but I'll have to hit the books to pass my Extra cuz it's all memorization. 73, K3DWW |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| USING GPS WITH VHF RADIO (DSC) HELP | General | |||
| VANISHED (stolen?)- a new (and unique) 57' Beneteau | Cruising | |||
| Icom 402 radio woes..or is it my antenna system? | Cruising | |||
| Radio for Newbies...... | General | |||