Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
Does anyone know if there is a set relationship between the accuracy / DOP/
Differenctial indicated on the GPS page to the accuracy of the compass direction? ( of the GPS) ie. Trying to determine how far off the compass rose would be off if WAAS sat's were being received and there was high accuracy. Kind of new at this. Any thoughts appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:12:28 -0500, "wg992000"
wrote: Does anyone know if there is a set relationship between the accuracy / DOP/ Differenctial indicated on the GPS page to the accuracy of the compass direction? ( of the GPS) ie. Trying to determine how far off the compass rose would be off if WAAS sat's were being received and there was high accuracy. Kind of new at this. Any thoughts appreciated. The compass course given by the gps depends more on how fast you are going than whether WAAS is on. The magnetic course depends then on whatever the software has for variation. Variation is a slowly changing function of location, so won't depend on WAAS at all. But, since you don't really know what the software does, you would be better reading true if you are trying to swing your compass with the GPS. Then use the variation from your chart. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a Entering your freshman dorm for the first time, and seeing an axe head come through the door on your right. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
I'm going to stick my neck out and ask a very newbie type question. Rodney
mentioned reading "True" rather than "Magnetic." I've puzzled for a while now over why we would use "True" at all. I know... I should know...but I don't. The compass is obviously "Magnetic" and it would be used for taking bearings while under way. That data is then transferred to a paper chart that has a compass rose with a magnetic measurement in it. In short, when would one use the "True" measurement on a chart, when reporting ones position to another, in a electronic charting program or any other occasion? Blushing Bob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
"SB" wrote in message
... I'm going to stick my neck out and ask a very newbie type question. Rodney mentioned reading "True" rather than "Magnetic." I've puzzled for a while now over why we would use "True" at all. I know... I should know...but I don't. The compass is obviously "Magnetic" and it would be used for taking bearings while under way. That data is then transferred to a paper chart that has a compass rose with a magnetic measurement in it. In short, when would one use the "True" measurement on a chart, when reporting ones position to another, in a electronic charting program or any other occasion? The GPS, when moving, points to the true geographic north, while a compass points to the magnetic north. These are not the same. The magnetic north is a few degrees off, depending on time and where you are. A good chart will show this magnetic variance in the compass rose printed on the chart. Meindert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:05:27 -0800, "SB" wrote:
I'm going to stick my neck out and ask a very newbie type question. Rodney mentioned reading "True" rather than "Magnetic." I've puzzled for a while now over why we would use "True" at all. I know... I should know...but I don't. The compass is obviously "Magnetic" and it would be used for taking bearings while under way. That data is then transferred to a paper chart that has a compass rose with a magnetic measurement in it. In short, when would one use the "True" measurement on a chart, when reporting ones position to another, in a electronic charting program or any other occasion? Sorry, I tried to make that clear. The 'true' measurement is derived first from successive Lat-Lon measurements, so it is historical as others have said. The 'magnetic' depends on a lookup table in memory if it is done by the gps. As you will see if you read the compass rose legend on a chart, the variation changes slowly over the years. Unless you know if your gps updates its table, and/or when its data were entered, you would be taking a chance. Even though the 'true' is historic, it is possible to use it for swinging. You must motor along an ad hoc range line at constant speed, the faster the better. A motorboat will be easier., but if the direction reading doesn't change at all for some time. you should be ok. If you can hold the range and the speed over ground, your true heading will also hold steady and be correct. If conditions prevent you from holding, it's the wrong time to swing your compass. HTH Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a Entering your freshman dorm for the first time, and seeing an axe head come through the door on your right. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
SB wrote:
I'm going to stick my neck out and ask a very newbie type question. Rodney mentioned reading "True" rather than "Magnetic." I've puzzled for a while now over why we would use "True" at all. I know... I should know...but I don't. The compass is obviously "Magnetic" and it would be used for taking bearings while under way. That data is then transferred to a paper chart that has a compass rose with a magnetic measurement in it. In short, when would one use the "True" measurement on a chart, when reporting ones position to another, in a electronic charting program or any other occasion? Blushing Bob Since the position of magnetic north is changing perpetually, it is standard practice to give all bearings etc, in true notation, and apply the correction factor appropriate to the time and location of the navigator. The compass rose on charts, where magnetic north has moved almost as soon as the chart is published and sold, is for guidance only. GPS bearings and calculated courses are corrected for magnetic north as at the time and place of the fix shown on the screen, but the user has the option to display in true notation if he/she so pleases. I personally set my GPS to true readout, but others may prefer to set theirs to magnetic. Remove "nospam" from return address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
GPS has no compass heading information, actually. This is why your
GPS doesn't know which way to point the "heading up" display on the chart plotter when the boat is stopped, unless you have a compass sensor input. The heading information on a GPS-only system depends on measuring the change in the lat/long over several measuring periods before it displays heading information. If the boat merely rotates around its anchor, this information will not be available or will be totally inaccurate. GPS receivers only provide 3 pieces of information. Latitude, Longitude and Altitude....the 3 dimensions in space. All other information (speed, heading, COG, VMG, etc.) are all derived by the computer monitoring the changes in these 3 dimensions over time.....many seconds. That's why it takes so long for it to change heading or speed or VMG or other derived outputs when you make that turn or come about. On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:12:28 -0500, "wg992000" wrote: Does anyone know if there is a set relationship between the accuracy / DOP/ Differenctial indicated on the GPS page to the accuracy of the compass direction? ( of the GPS) ie. Trying to determine how far off the compass rose would be off if WAAS sat's were being received and there was high accuracy. Kind of new at this. Any thoughts appreciated. Larry W4CSC Is it just me or did the US and UK just capture 1/3 of the world's sweetest oil supply? What idiot wants to GIVE IT BACK?!! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
Larry W4CSC wrote:
GPS has no compass heading information, actually. This is why your GPS doesn't know which way to point the "heading up" display on the chart plotter when the boat is stopped, unless you have a compass sensor input. The heading information on a GPS-only system depends on measuring the change in the lat/long over several measuring periods before it displays heading information. If the boat merely rotates around its anchor, this information will not be available or will be totally inaccurate. GPS receivers only provide 3 pieces of information. Latitude, Longitude and Altitude....the 3 dimensions in space. All other information (speed, heading, COG, VMG, etc.) are all derived by the computer monitoring the changes in these 3 dimensions over time.....many seconds. That's why it takes so long for it to change heading or speed or VMG or other derived outputs when you make that turn or come about. You forgot time. And how long is the "so long" you refer to in indicating a change in heading or speed? It doesn't seem "so long" on my GPS instruments. Perhaps you wired them up wrong, eh? -- Email sent to is never read. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
... GPS receivers only provide 3 pieces of information. Latitude, Longitude and Altitude....the 3 dimensions in space. All other information (speed, heading, COG, VMG, etc.) are all derived by the computer monitoring the changes in these 3 dimensions over time.....many seconds. That's why it takes so long for it to change heading or speed or VMG or other derived outputs when you make that turn or come about. I have heard otherwise: A GPS derives it's speed from the doppler shift on the received carriers. A very slow averaging filter smoothes the output, which causes the delay in indicated speed. The filter is there to prevent erroneous speed indication due to atmospheric disurbances and multi-path signals. Meindert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
GPS Accuracy
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:34:35 +0100, "Meindert Sprang"
wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... GPS receivers only provide 3 pieces of information. Latitude, Longitude and Altitude....the 3 dimensions in space. All other information (speed, heading, COG, VMG, etc.) are all derived by the computer monitoring the changes in these 3 dimensions over time.....many seconds. That's why it takes so long for it to change heading or speed or VMG or other derived outputs when you make that turn or come about. I have heard otherwise: A GPS derives it's speed from the doppler shift on the received carriers. A very slow averaging filter smoothes the output, which causes the delay in indicated speed. The filter is there to prevent erroneous speed indication due to atmospheric disurbances and multi-path signals. Meindert This might be true on some $70K sophisticated survey instrument or other, but, here at least, our discussion is about GPS operation on a cheaply-made piece of crap sold to the boating consumer at amazing markups, not sophisticated electronics. What you're talking about costs serious money. You won't find that at Waste Marine where price isn't related to quality.....(c; Larry W4CSC Is it just me or did the US and UK just capture 1/3 of the world's sweetest oil supply? What idiot wants to GIVE IT BACK?!! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Source of hull line dwgs, accuracy for a half_hull | Boat Building | |||
A couple of newbie questions | General | |||
Computerized gauges | Cruising |