| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since no one answered your question,,
Yes it would be a problem winding a wire around the line. That is if you make very many turns of the wire. It will act like a choke to the RF and only the very bottom part of the "coil" of wire will be effective as an antenna. The rest of it will be electrically disconnected as far as the RF is concerned due to the inductance of the choke that you have made. This is of course at the higher frequencies. It may work fairly well at 2182. The old AM whip antennas that were used on 2 and sometimes on 4 mhz and not on higher frequencies had a center loading coil wound on them. This increased their efficiency over just a straight whip and putting all the loading coil in the antenna tuner. With the coil higher up on the antenna it provided a little higher feed point impedance and resulted in a more efficient antenna. This worked well when only 2 and 4 mhz was involved. But when higher frequencies are fed to such an antenna that loading coil that worked wonders on the low frequencies acts like a choke at the higher frequencies and effectively disconnects everything above the coil, including part or most of the coil. You then have only a very short antenna working for you making it very inefficient. You could fasten a straight piece of wire to the kevlar and it should work fine. Regards Gary On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 13:32:36 -0800, "maxlynn" wrote: Okay, here's another question on antenna configuration. I have just gone through the pricing out of backstay insulators, and received the suggestion that a good, less expensive alternative would be to substitute a Kevlar backstay for the rod that I have presently, and wind a piece bare of wire around the Kevlar, up to near the masthead as an antenna. It is significantly less expensive, and the Kevlar has the advantage of being stronger and lighter than the wire. Anyone know of any disadvantages to this approach?? "john s." wrote in message . com... Glenn Ashmore wrote in message news:JRxob.119973$sp2.25191@lakeread04... In the process of laying up the hull I incorporated a couple hundred sq. ft of bronze bug screen to serve as a counterpoise. In addition two runs of 2" copper foil run down the center of the hull to the keel area. Capacitors between the foil and the keel bolts isolate any DC from getting back into the counterpoise. That is probably enough but as I am installing two aluminum tanks, I wonder how kosher it would be to tie them into the counterpoise with more capacitors. It would add another 14 sq ft of coupling area but would it be introducing other problems? Glenn, I think you are overdoing it....I just have a copper strap from the ground of the antenna tuner to one keel bolt (external lead keel) and when I tested the syste,after installation (in New York), I got a 55 report from a ham in NW Spain. The only time Herb (Southbound II) did not hear me loud and clear was because my copper strrap had become corroded/ john N2ZOA/MM |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The coil in the center of an antenna is not a choke it is just an
inductor that electrically lengthens the antenna. This method is used well above 2-4 mhz in mobile radio. It is not used much above VHF because a full wave length is already relatively small. Ron |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The coil in the center of a marine antenna that is designed to be used
on 2 mhz is indeed a choke at anything above 7 mhz or so. It is not intended to be such but that is what it is when the antenna is used above its intended range. All of the antenna above the coil is electrically disconnected from the lower part of the antenna. You could physically remove that upper portion and notice little if any difference at higher frequencies. That is the reason that type of antenna is not used on any system that operates above 4 mhz. A straight whip (no coil involved) is the only thing that will work satisfactorily in a multi band system. (trap antenna being the exception) Those old antennas with the loading coil in them perform much better on 2 mhz than the straight whip antenna of the same physical length but they are very poor on the higher bands as part of the antenna is not there electrically. It is then a very short antenna at the higher frequencies. Regards Gary On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:37:05 -0500 (EST), (Ron Thornton) wrote: The coil in the center of an antenna is not a choke it is just an inductor that electrically lengthens the antenna. This method is used well above 2-4 mhz in mobile radio. It is not used much above VHF because a full wave length is already relatively small. Ron |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well I guess if I tried to push 30 mhz thru a 2 mhz transmitter you
could call the transmitter a choke too. But in reality it ain't and the coil in the middle of an antenna ain't either. What you describe as a choke is a tuning inductor, the choking is an inconsequential behavior of the tuning at a frequency the antenna was never designed to operate at. Ron |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
If it acts like a choke it must be a choke. :)
Regards Gary On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:52:46 -0500 (EST), (Ron Thornton) wrote: Well I guess if I tried to push 30 mhz thru a 2 mhz transmitter you could call the transmitter a choke too. But in reality it ain't and the coil in the middle of an antenna ain't either. What you describe as a choke is a tuning inductor, the choking is an inconsequential behavior of the tuning at a frequency the antenna was never designed to operate at. Ron |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wires with a big coil in the middle is what I'm talking about. I guess
this is a semantics thing. I can't get used to calling it a choke cause in fixed station if we wanted to change freq that much we went out and threw up another 3 curtain full wave Rhombic. You mobile guys are strange, you want one antenna to do it all. Ron |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just can't figure out how to get a Rhombic on a sailboat. We don't expect
one antenna to do it all. I have separate antennas for HF, VHF, TV, GPS, WX SAT, DGPS, FM, HAM VHF, HAM UHF. If only a single antenna could do it all. Doug, k3qt s/v Callista "Ron Thornton" wrote in message ... Wires with a big coil in the middle is what I'm talking about. I guess this is a semantics thing. I can't get used to calling it a choke cause in fixed station if we wanted to change freq that much we went out and threw up another 3 curtain full wave Rhombic. You mobile guys are strange, you want one antenna to do it all. Ron |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Gary Schafer wrote: The coil in the center of a marine antenna that is designed to be used on 2 mhz is indeed a choke at anything above 7 mhz or so. It is not intended to be such but that is what it is when the antenna is used above its intended range. All of the antenna above the coil is electrically disconnected from the lower part of the antenna. You could physically remove that upper portion and notice little if any difference at higher frequencies. That is the reason that type of antenna is not used on any system that operates above 4 mhz. A straight whip (no coil involved) is the only thing that will work satisfactorily in a multi band system. (trap antenna being the exception) Those old antennas with the loading coil in them perform much better on 2 mhz than the straight whip antenna of the same physical length but they are very poor on the higher bands as part of the antenna is not there electrically. It is then a very short antenna at the higher frequencies. Regards Gary On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:37:05 -0500 (EST), (Ron Thornton) wrote: The coil in the center of an antenna is not a choke it is just an inductor that electrically lengthens the antenna. This method is used well above 2-4 mhz in mobile radio. It is not used much above VHF because a full wave length is already relatively small. Ron Just a few comments here on this thread....... Gary is right on in his assesment of the operation of the end feed loaded antenna. The coil does indeed act as a choke on frequencies higher than 4XResonant. In the "Old Days" we used Morad 2800 and 3600 loaded whips with 15 to 35 ft of wire below them as antennas in the MF Frequency Range. They were just great below 5 Mhz, and not half bad above that as the coil only choked off the upper 102" whip and the coil itself, and left the bottom 10ft of antenna and 35 Ft of wire as an antenna for the HF Ranges above 5 Mhz. This 45 Ft of antenna did just fine as an antenna in those ranges as it would be tuned (Fixed tuned antenna tuner era) as 3/4 Wavelength at these higher frequencies. today's autotuners have a similar tuning firmware routine that adds output Capacitance untill it finds the 3/4 Wavelength point. They don't do as good of job as a Fixed tuned tuner due to the step size and the sense circuits, but they will get close, and be fairly effecent. The trick to make this type of antenna work is to get some wire under the antenna, so that you have an effective antenna length once the coil chokes off, as the frequency rises. Most of the North Pacific Fishing Fleet uses this type of antenna system for MF, and HF, comms. Bruce in alaska -- add a 2 before @ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|