Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:10:02 -0600, Geoff Schultz
wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in : Justin C wrote: Willy, your logic is flawed. It is exactly because Roger sails that he needs to polish/clean/filter his fuel. If he motored everywhere there'd be less need because the diesel wouldn't be in his tanks long enough to grow those organisms. It's actually quite a bit more complex than that. First, Neal's affectation that "real sailors" use their engine as little as possible is silly. If that's the way he wants to play the game (at least in his fantasy life), fine. One of the most respected saiors in Maine cruised and won races for years in a boat that didn't even have an engine installed. Making a value judgement about others who cruise differently, however, is just another personality and perspective defect. I sail as much in my real cruising as Neal does in his fantasy cruising but, because I have a real and reliable engine, I ADD to that long periods of powerboat operation. For sake of argument, sure, I'm not a sailor. I'm a mariner. I have a sailboat because I prefer sailing to motoring when the conditions are right and like the freedom, range, and economy of next to no cost power. When conditions are not right for sailing though, which is a lot of the time in this part of the world, I prefer motoring to sitting still or going very slowly with the kind of concentration it takes to keep a boat moving in light air. Strider is nearly as good a powerboat as sailboat and I'm just as content to listen to her excellent diesel run as the coast of Maine slides by as I am sailing. During sailing season in Maine, we typically have wind for only half the day so I burn a lot of fuel. I burn enough fuel and supplies are clean enough here that I don't need the large capacity and polishing system at all. I'm getting the boat ready for long cruises to areas with few fuel supply points. I'll have to do a lot more light air sailing and sitting at anchor to conserve fuel but that's fine because I won't have the time pressure of fitting the cruise in between fixed shore commitments as I have had to do for the past few years. I want the flexibility though of being able to operate as a powerboat for reasonable periods. Since I consider power equally as much a part of my cruising as sailing, I want the engine to be as reliable as the rig. Clean fuel, especially in remote areas, is the foundation of that. I'll point out again that this group is rec.boats.CRUISING. It's not a sailing group and it shouldn't discriminate between sail and power boats. If you want to be a sailing purist, go have conversations in a purely sailing newgroup. If you're a cruiser, many times you'll find that either the wind isn't blowing or is blowing out of the wrong direction. As I often say, "The windex points the way" meaning that's the way that you want to go. And many times you can't sit around waiting for the perfect weather window, and as a result you have to motor. There's also a big difference between someone who goes out on the weekend with the boys, bashing along with the toe rail in the water and a cruiser who has their household stored below. I hate pulling in and finding the contents of the cabinets shuffled all around and things in the cabin tossed around. Let's not forget that all important marital/relationship bliss factor. It's very important, especially on a small boat where there's little personal space, to keep the admiral happy. I know very few women who like having the toe rail in the water for any extended period of time. I'd much rather cruise with a wonderful, happy woman who keeps me warm at night as opposed to cruising solo or with a bunch of smelly guys! So to emphasize Roger's statement, engines aren't something that most sailing cruisers want to use on a regular basis, but they're important, as without them most cruisers wouldn't go very far. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org Both Geoff and Roger make excellent points which jibe with my experience. Of course one of the reasons Wilbur is so fervid about not using power is because he is/was using something like a 10 horse outboard for an aux. No offense intended to others using outboards, but nothing could be more unsuited for aux power on a cruising boat. Small outboards typically have minimal or no alternator for battery charging, burn over twice as much fuel as a comparable diesel, introduce the risks of gasoline storage, have props that are inefficient for slow speed/heavy load operation, and tend to be unreliable in long term service under those conditions. In my opinion outboards are suitable only for day sailors or weekend cruising. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:10:30 -0500, "Roger Long"
wrote: Justin C wrote: Willy, your logic is flawed. It is exactly because Roger sails that he needs to polish/clean/filter his fuel. If he motored everywhere there'd be less need because the diesel wouldn't be in his tanks long enough to grow those organisms. It's actually quite a bit more complex than that. First, Neal's affectation that "real sailors" use their engine as little as possible is silly. If that's the way he wants to play the game (at least in his fantasy life), fine. One of the most respected saiors in Maine cruised and won races for years in a boat that didn't even have an engine installed. Making a value judgement about others who cruise differently, however, is just another personality and perspective defect. I sail as much in my real cruising as Neal does in his fantasy cruising but, because I have a real and reliable engine, I ADD to that long periods of powerboat operation. For sake of argument, sure, I'm not a sailor. I'm a mariner. I have a sailboat because I prefer sailing to motoring when the conditions are right and like the freedom, range, and economy of next to no cost power. When conditions are not right for sailing though, which is a lot of the time in this part of the world, I prefer motoring to sitting still or going very slowly with the kind of concentration it takes to keep a boat moving in light air. Strider is nearly as good a powerboat as sailboat and I'm just as content to listen to her excellent diesel run as the coast of Maine slides by as I am sailing. During sailing season in Maine, we typically have wind for only half the day so I burn a lot of fuel. I burn enough fuel and supplies are clean enough here that I don't need the large capacity and polishing system at all. I'm getting the boat ready for long cruises to areas with few fuel supply points. I'll have to do a lot more light air sailing and sitting at anchor to conserve fuel but that's fine because I won't have the time pressure of fitting the cruise in between fixed shore commitments as I have had to do for the past few years. I want the flexibility though of being able to operate as a powerboat for reasonable periods. Since I consider power equally as much a part of my cruising as sailing, I want the engine to be as reliable as the rig. Clean fuel, especially in remote areas, is the foundation of that. In fact, once you leave the realm of the weekend sailor and get into actually going somewhere in a sail boat I don't know a single boat, with the possible exception of the Pardies (who have been known to call into a marina asking for a tow to get in and tie up) , who doesn't have an engine. A mate of mine, coming back from a trip to the W. Coast of India motored for a week to get back. It is all well and good to say that "real sailors sail, but had he not motored he would have got back next year. You see, the monsoons were changing and had he not motored the N.Easterlies would have caught him and that would have been that till next year. Of the blasted trip I just made to Malaysia, helping a friend take his boat down. We had mild weather, "maybe no wind" forcasted and ended up with 20 - 30 K wind and 3 to 4 M beam swell. Then the Main blew out so we are now reduced to a reefed jib, and we were rocking and rolling. Swell and wind on the beam, lee shore with no hidy holes 40 miles to leeward, India to windward and 50 miles north or south to the closest shelter. Midnight, both wives down below barfing and me and Frank in the cockpit hanging on with both hands. So we motored. By the way, for those nautically challenged, my wife says she has discovered a better way of being seasick. Barf into a plastic bag. you don't have to try to hit a moving target when theboat is rolling and the bucket starts slipping and slidding and when you are empty just twist the neck shut and hang on until the next spasm. One good size bag will last nearly 8 hours she reckons. Nope, no motor, no go. Cheers, Bruce in bangkok (bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:10:02 -0600, Geoff Schultz
wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in : Justin C wrote: Willy, your logic is flawed. It is exactly because Roger sails that he needs to polish/clean/filter his fuel. If he motored everywhere there'd be less need because the diesel wouldn't be in his tanks long enough to grow those organisms. It's actually quite a bit more complex than that. First, Neal's affectation that "real sailors" use their engine as little as possible is silly. If that's the way he wants to play the game (at least in his fantasy life), fine. One of the most respected saiors in Maine cruised and won races for years in a boat that didn't even have an engine installed. Making a value judgement about others who cruise differently, however, is just another personality and perspective defect. I sail as much in my real cruising as Neal does in his fantasy cruising but, because I have a real and reliable engine, I ADD to that long periods of powerboat operation. For sake of argument, sure, I'm not a sailor. I'm a mariner. I have a sailboat because I prefer sailing to motoring when the conditions are right and like the freedom, range, and economy of next to no cost power. When conditions are not right for sailing though, which is a lot of the time in this part of the world, I prefer motoring to sitting still or going very slowly with the kind of concentration it takes to keep a boat moving in light air. Strider is nearly as good a powerboat as sailboat and I'm just as content to listen to her excellent diesel run as the coast of Maine slides by as I am sailing. During sailing season in Maine, we typically have wind for only half the day so I burn a lot of fuel. I burn enough fuel and supplies are clean enough here that I don't need the large capacity and polishing system at all. I'm getting the boat ready for long cruises to areas with few fuel supply points. I'll have to do a lot more light air sailing and sitting at anchor to conserve fuel but that's fine because I won't have the time pressure of fitting the cruise in between fixed shore commitments as I have had to do for the past few years. I want the flexibility though of being able to operate as a powerboat for reasonable periods. Since I consider power equally as much a part of my cruising as sailing, I want the engine to be as reliable as the rig. Clean fuel, especially in remote areas, is the foundation of that. I'll point out again that this group is rec.boats.CRUISING. It's not a sailing group and it shouldn't discriminate between sail and power boats. If you want to be a sailing purist, go have conversations in a purely sailing newgroup. If you're a cruiser, many times you'll find that either the wind isn't blowing or is blowing out of the wrong direction. As I often say, "The windex points the way" meaning that's the way that you want to go. And many times you can't sit around waiting for the perfect weather window, and as a result you have to motor. There's also a big difference between someone who goes out on the weekend with the boys, bashing along with the toe rail in the water and a cruiser who has their household stored below. I hate pulling in and finding the contents of the cabinets shuffled all around and things in the cabin tossed around. Let's not forget that all important marital/relationship bliss factor. It's very important, especially on a small boat where there's little personal space, to keep the admiral happy. I know very few women who like having the toe rail in the water for any extended period of time. I'd much rather cruise with a wonderful, happy woman who keeps me warm at night as opposed to cruising solo or with a bunch of smelly guys! So to emphasize Roger's statement, engines aren't something that most sailing cruisers want to use on a regular basis, but they're important, as without them most cruisers wouldn't go very far. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org I keep my boat in a marina with possibly 150 other sail boats. Not a one of them that doesn't have an engine. So much for "Sailors Sail" as all of these boats came here from somewhere else -- like California, Australia, Germany, England... even saw one from Maryland... Real Sailormen do what ever is needed to get where they are going. Always has been that way too. Cheers, Bruce in bangkok (bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:56:44 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:10:02 -0600, Geoff Schultz wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in : Justin C wrote: Willy, your logic is flawed. It is exactly because Roger sails that he needs to polish/clean/filter his fuel. If he motored everywhere there'd be less need because the diesel wouldn't be in his tanks long enough to grow those organisms. It's actually quite a bit more complex than that. First, Neal's affectation that "real sailors" use their engine as little as possible is silly. If that's the way he wants to play the game (at least in his fantasy life), fine. One of the most respected saiors in Maine cruised and won races for years in a boat that didn't even have an engine installed. Making a value judgement about others who cruise differently, however, is just another personality and perspective defect. I sail as much in my real cruising as Neal does in his fantasy cruising but, because I have a real and reliable engine, I ADD to that long periods of powerboat operation. For sake of argument, sure, I'm not a sailor. I'm a mariner. I have a sailboat because I prefer sailing to motoring when the conditions are right and like the freedom, range, and economy of next to no cost power. When conditions are not right for sailing though, which is a lot of the time in this part of the world, I prefer motoring to sitting still or going very slowly with the kind of concentration it takes to keep a boat moving in light air. Strider is nearly as good a powerboat as sailboat and I'm just as content to listen to her excellent diesel run as the coast of Maine slides by as I am sailing. During sailing season in Maine, we typically have wind for only half the day so I burn a lot of fuel. I burn enough fuel and supplies are clean enough here that I don't need the large capacity and polishing system at all. I'm getting the boat ready for long cruises to areas with few fuel supply points. I'll have to do a lot more light air sailing and sitting at anchor to conserve fuel but that's fine because I won't have the time pressure of fitting the cruise in between fixed shore commitments as I have had to do for the past few years. I want the flexibility though of being able to operate as a powerboat for reasonable periods. Since I consider power equally as much a part of my cruising as sailing, I want the engine to be as reliable as the rig. Clean fuel, especially in remote areas, is the foundation of that. I'll point out again that this group is rec.boats.CRUISING. It's not a sailing group and it shouldn't discriminate between sail and power boats. If you want to be a sailing purist, go have conversations in a purely sailing newgroup. If you're a cruiser, many times you'll find that either the wind isn't blowing or is blowing out of the wrong direction. As I often say, "The windex points the way" meaning that's the way that you want to go. And many times you can't sit around waiting for the perfect weather window, and as a result you have to motor. There's also a big difference between someone who goes out on the weekend with the boys, bashing along with the toe rail in the water and a cruiser who has their household stored below. I hate pulling in and finding the contents of the cabinets shuffled all around and things in the cabin tossed around. Let's not forget that all important marital/relationship bliss factor. It's very important, especially on a small boat where there's little personal space, to keep the admiral happy. I know very few women who like having the toe rail in the water for any extended period of time. I'd much rather cruise with a wonderful, happy woman who keeps me warm at night as opposed to cruising solo or with a bunch of smelly guys! So to emphasize Roger's statement, engines aren't something that most sailing cruisers want to use on a regular basis, but they're important, as without them most cruisers wouldn't go very far. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org Both Geoff and Roger make excellent points which jibe with my experience. Of course one of the reasons Wilbur is so fervid about not using power is because he is/was using something like a 10 horse outboard for an aux. No offense intended to others using outboards, but nothing could be more unsuited for aux power on a cruising boat. Small outboards typically have minimal or no alternator for battery charging, burn over twice as much fuel as a comparable diesel, introduce the risks of gasoline storage, have props that are inefficient for slow speed/heavy load operation, and tend to be unreliable in long term service under those conditions. In my opinion outboards are suitable only for day sailors or weekend cruising. Damned good for dinghys too... Cheers, Bruce in bangkok (bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 11, 1:23*pm, "Roger Long" wrote:
I drained my primary Racor filter today and have this to report on one of the world's smallest on board fuel polishing systems: There was not a drop of water or speck of dirt in the drained fuel. *It looked perfect. *The 2 Mu filter element was slightly discolored but with nothing visible on the surface and it was clearly not challenged by anything in the fuel. The previously white polishing system filter was a dark grey brown and had clearly picked up quite a bit of stuff. *No visible loading though. This system: http://home.roadrunner.com/~rlma/StriderFuelSystem.htm exceeded all expectations in operation this season. *It's simple and intuitive to operate, works in almost any mode, and was trouble free. *The only change made during the season was to add a high point loop to the common vent so fuel wouldn't flow into the lower tank at large heel angles. The only operation challenge was forgetting to open the main tank valve a few times since I close the tank which can siphon in case of a fuel leak. Fortunately, the fuel pump makes a distinctive clattering when drawing against a closed valve for several minutes before the engine starts to stumble and I can open the valve from the cockpit. The only surprise was the that transfer pump would only suck about 80% of the fuel out of the lower tank when transferring to the upper tank. *Once the boat was hauled, I determined that it is simply because the flow capacity is so high that it sucks air down through the fuel. *With the lower draw of the regular fuel pump, it will draw down to a lower level. *The operational quirk then is that the polishing system needs to be off to use the last of the fuel in the keel tank. *This would be a rare occurrence though since drawing from a tank that low runs the risk of drawing air into the system due to sloshing. This whole system is a testament to the value of a group like this, even for a boat designer. *Thanks to all who took time to discuss it while I was developing it. -- Roger Long In order for "the gumk" to grow in your fuel tank their must be water present, no water, no gunk. This is the main reason it is always reccomended that you keep your tank full. A full tank will not draw moist air into the tank through the vent as the fuel expands and contracts when it warms and cools.If you've got water in the fuel, your going to have some kind of growth unless you treat your fuel with an aditive like Biobor. Filtering it, or as some prefer to call it, polishing it, will remove the growth, but it may not remove the water, depending on how long your fuel pickup is. Your best bet is to treat your fuel on a regular basis, keep the tanks full at all times, and change filters at the first sign of trouble. Polishing is only going to make the problem go away for some period of time, but it will be back. Another point, those 2 micron filters on your Racor, check with your engine manufacturer, I've never heard of one reccomending more than a 30 micron filter as the promary. Using more restrictive filters can cause problems with your supply pump, or, even worse, cause the engine to run lean. That will cause the engine to run hot and, over the long run, cause all kinds of other problems. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt John wrote: Using more restrictive filters can
cause problems with your supply pump, or, even worse, cause the engine to run lean. That will cause the engine to run hot and, over the long run, cause all kinds of other problems. Huh? Diesels do not run "lean". Hint, think about you control power/speed in a diesel. Cheers Martin |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt John wrote:
(Always keep your tank full.) The keep your tank full business has been pretty much demolished here and in other venues. It isn't practical anyway unless you cruise from marina to marina and spend a lot of time fueling. Constantly topping up instead of burning the fuel means that there will always be a large component of older fuel in the tank mix. Another point, those 2 micron filters on your Racor, check with your engine manufacturer..... This can be an issue in most circumstances. However, with the fuel polishing system (I agree BTW that it is a silly name but it's the one in current usage) the Racor gets much cleaner fuel than in a typical system. Because the Racor is one of the smallest filters available it is way oversize for the engine. It's a 15 GPH filter on an engine that normally draws about 1. This makes the pressure drop across it with the finer element much less of an issue. It's also being pressure fed by an electric fuel pump. The gauge between the filter and the engine driven pump always shows positive PSI so I have no concerns. I also have a bypass from the fuel polishing pump that can be opened in a few moments to completely bypass the 2 mu Racor while I change the element. Better to have that one load up than the engine mounted secondary which is harder to change and requires bleeding the injectors afterwards. -- Roger Long |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... I have a Yamaha 9.9 high thrust 4-stroke outboard that is specifically designed to propell a sailboat efficiently. It has a HUGE, slow turning prop. This prop would look more at home on something north of 60 or 70 HP. I can cruise at hull speed at about 1/4 throttle, and we can carry on a converasaton in the cockpit without raiseing our voices any louder than when we are at home at the dinner table. Did the prop come with the engine or did you change it out when you bought it? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Martin Baxter
wrote: Capt John wrote: Using more restrictive filters can cause problems with your supply pump, or, even worse, cause the engine to run lean. That will cause the engine to run hot and, over the long run, cause all kinds of other problems. Huh? Diesels do not run "lean". Hint, think about you control power/speed in a diesel. Cheers Martin Just one of a few of Capt. John's misconceptions...... |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article s.com,
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Roger Long" wrote in message ... I drained my primary Racor filter today and have this to report on one of the world's smallest on board fuel polishing systems: snipped boring crap Fuel polishing??? Whoever coined that stupid, inaccurate phrase? It's fuel filtering. Why not call a spade a spade? The saddest thing about it all is how diesel fuel is so unsuited to anything but being burned. It can't be stored for any decent length of time with out growing all sorts of crud. Pretty damned stupid for yachts where it's often stored for month upon months. The only thing more stupid is people who try to make it sound glamorous by calling it "fuel polishing" and bragging about their systems that only indicate they hardly ever sail. Wilbur Hubbard So speaks, a SailHead, with nothing but Wind between his ears.... I've run Diesel from 55USG Drums filled during WWII, with no problem, whatsoever. This stuff is over 50 years old, and makes power in my Gensets, just spiffy..... -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fuel polishing | Cruising | |||
Fuel polishing | Cruising | |||
Fuel Polishing System Finished! | Electronics |