| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Marty" wrote in message ... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: snip Skippy would be better off going around Cape Fear with plenty of offing rather than trying that yacht channel at night. It appears the winds are nothing to be concerned about so the seas can't bee too bad. The only advantage of transiting the shoal water through the channel might be a little less current but depending upon the state of the tide there could even be more current in the cut than going around the Frying Pan shoals. I'd go outside at night and inside during the day. I will defer to your local, (perhaps loco?) knowledge. Given modern nav systems though, I really don't see to much issue with doing it at night, tidal currents and those due the Gulf Stream would take precedence for me. I refuse to take a chance, ever, on going aground when there's a safe, viable alternative to taking the chance. One would never wish to go aground on the Cape Fear shoals. It could cost you your boat. Not that they are hard or rocky or anything like that but there's currents and tides thunder storms and not much civilization or assistance around. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:05:53 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: One would never wish to go aground on the Cape Fear shoals. It could cost you your boat. Not that they are hard or rocky or anything like that but there's currents and tides thunder storms and not much civilization or assistance around. That's all true but the channel is well marked with a couple of large buoys that are exactly where the chart shows them to be. We've been through there twice at night and had no problem. Adverse current inside is about half that of going around the end, it's about 20 miles shorter, and they've got nearly perfect weather tonight. Winds are aft from the NE at 10 to 12 and seas are less than 3 ft, about as good as it gets. I'd definitely go outside in high winds or adverse visibility however. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:05:53 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: One would never wish to go aground on the Cape Fear shoals. It could cost you your boat. Not that they are hard or rocky or anything like that but there's currents and tides thunder storms and not much civilization or assistance around. That's all true but the channel is well marked with a couple of large buoys that are exactly where the chart shows them to be. We've been through there twice at night and had no problem. Adverse current inside is about half that of going around the end, it's about 20 miles shorter, and they've got nearly perfect weather tonight. Winds are aft from the NE at 10 to 12 and seas are less than 3 ft, about as good as it gets. I'd definitely go outside in high winds or adverse visibility however. Looking his last data, I'm thinking he may be planning to go just inside R12, 18 miles SE of the channel. Cheers Marty |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
I refuse to take a chance, ever, on going aground when there's a safe, viable alternative to taking the chance. One would never wish to go aground on the Cape Fear shoals. It could cost you your boat. Not that they are hard or rocky or anything like that but there's currents and tides thunder storms and not much civilization or assistance around. It may be premature to decide where he's going, it'd still be just a small change to port to go SE of the yacht channel, the chart I'm looking at, 11520 seems to indicate he could expect six to eight fathoms there. Cheers Martin Wilbur Hubbard |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Transducer Footprint Calculator | General | |||
| O/T Life Expectancy Calculator | ASA | |||
| O/T Life Expectancy Calculator | ASA | |||
| O/T Life Expectancy Calculator | ASA | |||
| O/T Life Expectancy Calculator | ASA | |||