![]() |
Radio Call Signs
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:46:07 -0700, in message
.com Peter Bennett wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:05:14 -0400, Ryk wrote: What are the likely consequences if I don't? So, Yes, if you take your Canadian boat into US waters, you require a Canadian Ship Station License, in addition to the Radio Operator Certificate. Similarly, a US vessel in Canadian waters requires a US Ship Station License. I understand that a few years ago, some Canadian vessels on the Great Lakes got into Serious Legal Problems when they ventured into US waters without a station license. What were the SLPs? Would I be better off not transmitting in US waters? Or are you thinking of the incidents in the Detroit River? Ryk |
Radio Call Signs
|
Radio Call Signs
Ryk wrote in
: On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:41:30 -0500, in message mister b wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:39:29 -0400, Ryk wrote: In my neck of the woods (Eastern Lake Ontario) 16 remains the only calling channel. ???!? 16 a calling channel in Canada for pleasure boaters? I don't think so Ryk. It is the calling channel endorsed by international convention and by the Coast Guard. I understand that 9 is an alternate in congested spaces in the US, but 16 is not congested up here. Ryk Just for information on the ICW and Charleston in South Carolina: Everyone monitors Channel 16, including all marinas, switching to working channels 68, 69, 71, 72 for comms. Opening road bridges all monitor Channel 9 across SC, the pleasure boat calling channel pleasure boats never monitor because of the bridge traffic. Shrimp boats and tourist cruise boats are on 10 or 11, but monitor 13 underway as well as 16 if they have the equipment. Yacht Clubs scan 16 and 68 or 69 on the harbor. CG monitors 16 and 22A but, as the S/V Morning Dew incident proves, do not respond well, even if a ship confirms screaming in the waters at the jetties. The towing companies usually have their attention better. Call the ships on 13 if you are in the ship channels underway to plan passing situations with the harbor pilots who are always very nice and helpful. The pilot boat monitors 10, 13, 16, too. Dredges can be found, generally, on 13 and 10. SeaTow/Towboat US monitors 16, 22A in Mt Pleasant's office and on the boats. Race control for all sailboat races monitors 72 if you need them. The boats in the race monitor 72 for instructions, but captains are usually too busy screaming at their crews who just ran over the now-torn spinnaker to answer the calls. That kind of cursing isn't permitted on the radio, anyways....(c; Cellular - The harbor and near offshore is well covered near Charleston and the local barrier islands by Verizon on 800 Mhz A and Alltel on 800 Mhz B well offshore 5-8 miles. ATT and Sprint on PCS have much more limited range on 1900 mhz, as does Nextel on iDen. Alltel's EVDO high speed internet works very well out nearly 20 miles if you are bluetooth tethered to the phone hanging from the mast in a zip lock bag with bluetooth linking the bag to the PC or, in my case, Nokia N800 Linux internet tablet on deck. Altitude is our friend! FREE wifi is available at Ashley Marina and Charleston City Marina where the ICW turns S off the Ashley River in front of the USCG Base Charleston. They make up for it by charging you through the nose for dockspace...ask Skip...$100/day for Flying Pig on the Megadock. Other marinas have wifi, but I'm not sure how they work it. Hundreds of unprotected wifi hotspots exist in downtown Charleston for you to use in a wide variety of places. Help yourself... |
Radio Call Signs
In article ,
Ryk wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:12:41 GMT, in message Bruce in alaska wrote: In article , Ryk wrote: I used to have a VHF station license for my boat, but dropped it when the local requirement went away. Somebody recently suggested to me that I would need a station license to legitimately operate my radio (on a Canadian registered vessel) in US waters. I do have an operator's license. Do I need more to be legit in the US? Ryk Yes, to legally operate your VHF Radio in US Waters you are REQUIRED by International Convention (ITU International Telecommunication Union) to have a current Radio Station License issued by the Country of your FLAG. Thanks Bruce! Is it specific about a license, or is it about meeting requirements of the FLAG? I know that when we race internationally the SIs refer to meeting requirements in the country of origin for either licensed or registered vessels on a lot of safety issues. What are the likely consequences if I don't? (Assuming I am otherwise in compliance and using my radio responsibly inside the Great Lakes Basin.) Is it different if I go south down the ICW? Ryk By International Convention, (ITU) each Country MUST supply it's Flagged Vessels with a Maritime Radio Station License, if it actually does license any Flagged Vessels under it's jurisdiction, if they make International Voyages. ( Voyages outside the waters, of the Nation of Flag) So Canada, if signatory to the ITU, (which it is) is required to issue a Maritime Radio License to any, and ALL vessels that it registers, that make voyages outside its Territorial Waters. There are some, Very Limited, Exceptions, and these are usually done by Treaty, usually by Adjacent Countries that share Common Waters, or adjacent International Waters. See the Great Lakes Convention Treaty between USA and Canada, and the EU Treaty for Europe. Some countries have Reciprocal Licensing Agreements that allow one countries License to be used in another Countries Territory. See ITU Convention for Aircraft Radio Licensing. I did a few Licenses for local Bush Pilots, that made trips into Canadian Territories, specifically to deliver Explosives and Caps, to Mining Operations that were more easily served from US Airports. You just can't imagine the Beauacratic BS involved, since 9/11. US Aircraft, that never leave US Territory, are covered by the Same Type of Blanket License that boats have, BUT if they leave US Airspace, they are REQUIRED to be licensed by the FCC/USA Government. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Radio Call Signs
On 21 Jul 2008 17:11:01 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:31:55 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: US Aircraft, that never leave US Territory, are covered by the Same Type of Blanket License that boats have, BUT if they leave US Airspace, they are REQUIRED to be licensed by the FCC/USA Government. You need to either sharpen your thinking or sharpen you expression. If they have a "blanket license" from the FCC then by definition they are "licensed" by that agency. Do you mean that the regulations specify explicitly that they must be individually "licensed" under those circumstances and that a "blanket license" will not do? There is a difference in terminology between countries (as usual). The US issues a "blanket station license" to cover all US vessels (is it just pleasure craft?) while they remain in US waters. This "blanket license" becomes invalid if such vessels enter the territory of another country, and the vessel then must obtain an individual station license. Canada exempts most Canadian vessels from having a station license, providing they remain in Canada. Vessels going to other countries must get a station license, as they will be outside the terms of the license exemption. -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
Radio Call Signs
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:44:04 -0400, Ryk
wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:46:07 -0700, in message s.com Peter Bennett wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:05:14 -0400, Ryk wrote: What are the likely consequences if I don't? So, Yes, if you take your Canadian boat into US waters, you require a Canadian Ship Station License, in addition to the Radio Operator Certificate. Similarly, a US vessel in Canadian waters requires a US Ship Station License. I understand that a few years ago, some Canadian vessels on the Great Lakes got into Serious Legal Problems when they ventured into US waters without a station license. What were the SLPs? Would I be better off not transmitting in US waters? Or are you thinking of the incidents in the Detroit River? Ryk I don't recall the details, but I believe the occupants of the vessels involved were arrested or detained. You do require a station license if you will be travelling in US waters and your vessel is equipped with a Marine radio. There is a statement regarding this from Industry Canada at http://www.cps-ecp.ca/public.asp?WCE=C=47|K=224768 -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
Radio Call Signs
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:20:45 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: Having been in the Radio Regulation Enforcement Biz for many years, Ah, that explains a great deal. I once had a partner who said he would never hire a former regulator as a lawyer. He said they were very good at being able to quote chapter and verse, and to regurgitate the agency's position, but very bad at determining when the agency was wrong. I wasn't one of the Lawyers, but a Resident Field Agent. I mostly did SOLAS Inspections on Compulsory Equipped Vessels, and a bit of Interference and unLicensed Operation Enforcement. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Radio Call Signs
|
Radio Call Signs
In article ,
Dave wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:04:51 GMT, Bruce in alaska said: I wasn't one of the Lawyers, but a Resident Field Agent. I mostly did SOLAS Inspections on Compulsory Equipped Vessels, and a bit of Interference and unLicensed Operation Enforcement. Ah, so you with enforcing the laws without any legal training. I got all the Legal Training I needed, from the Regional Legal Staff, and the US Attorney's Office. Just how much Legal Training do you think a US Marshal has? All he needs to know is your violating a Law, and he puts you in the Hoosgow... We, as Resident Field Agents, didn't have Arrest Powers, and when we needed "Muscle" we went and got a US Marshal, or a USCG Officer, depending if the violation was on LAND or Water. They provided the "Muscle", and we provided the expertise. Believe me, you don't want to be trying to tell a US Marshal, that he can't put the cuffs on you, or trying to tell a USCG Officer that he can't board you vessel, and do his duty. In BOTH cases, those guys have ALMOST unlimited Powers, on point, and they let the Courts worry about the fine points of the situation. I watched a US Marshal, lock up a small town Sheriff, in his own Slammer, for willful violations of the Communications Act of 1934. It stuck too. The guy did time for it, in a Federal Prison, and had to pay a $5KUS fine. I wasn't with the Commission at the time, but was the Radio Tech, for the local Sheriff, The Field Agent, was one of the toughest Inspecting Engineers, in the Commission, and a mentor while I was learning the Service Side, of the SOLAS Game., a few years later. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Radio Call Signs
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:19:48 -0700, in message
.com Peter Bennett wrote: I don't recall the details, but I believe the occupants of the vessels involved were arrested or detained. You do require a station license if you will be travelling in US waters and your vessel is equipped with a Marine radio. There is a statement regarding this from Industry Canada at http://www.cps-ecp.ca/public.asp?WCE=C=47|K=224768 Thanks Peter. I am surprised to hear of anybody being arrested or detained for properly operating a VHF without a station license. At least in the US and Canada. Do you have a cite? The IC link is actually an undated CPS news item that talks about 9/11 as recent, so I don't know if it is current. Are there any current references to US/Canada VHF rules in the Great Lakes? Ryk |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com