Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect that the light weight is the issue. Mine is a 30# aluminum.
Does not set in grass. Just flops over and drags on its side. Worked really well in most other situations, but then again my Bruce does just as well in those situations. Our CQR did better in grass although I had to dive on it and get it started on occation as well. Doug s/v Callista "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:33:16 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: We used an aluminum Spade as our primary in the Bahamas last winter but were less that happy with it. Going to keep it as a backup. ========================================== What kind of issues did you have with your spade? I have a 44# steel spade which I regard as the best I've ever used. Perhaps the aluminum makes it too light to set reliably? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect that the light weight is the issue. Mine is a 30# aluminum.
Does not set in grass. Just flops over and drags on its side. Worked really well in most other situations, but then again my Bruce does just as well in those situations. Our CQR did better in grass although I had to dive on it and get it started on occation as well. Doug s/v Callista "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:33:16 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: We used an aluminum Spade as our primary in the Bahamas last winter but were less that happy with it. Going to keep it as a backup. ========================================== What kind of issues did you have with your spade? I have a 44# steel spade which I regard as the best I've ever used. Perhaps the aluminum makes it too light to set reliably? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:33:16 -0500, "Doug Dotson"
wrote: We used an aluminum Spade as our primary in the Bahamas last winter but were less that happy with it. Going to keep it as a backup. ========================================== What kind of issues did you have with your spade? I have a 44# steel spade which I regard as the best I've ever used. Perhaps the aluminum makes it too light to set reliably? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We use all chain for our primary, and rope/chain for the second
anchor. Having all chain for both just adds too much weight in the bow. Priamry is a Bruce and secondary is a CQR. We used an aluminum Spade as our primary in the Bahamas last winter but were less that happy with it. Going to keep it as a backup. Doug s/v Callista "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... In light to moderate (10 kts) wind I found I can run the windlass for a few seconds to straighten the chain (that is, it will assume the mythical catenary shape to the anchor), then the boat will glide forward as the chain assumes its preferred orientation: roughly "L" shaped with a vertical off the bow and the rest on the bottom. I repeat a few times, the bow is over the anchor with minimal stress on the windlass. I agree that using the windlass for maneuvering in anything more than that is asking for trouble - I've usually used the engine when setting two anchors. My real issue with this is that adding 100 feet of chain solely for the purpose of extending the rode to set a Bahamian Moor seems a bit odd. Why not splice in some 9/16 nylon? - even without a rope/chain gypsy, its fairly easy to haul in the rope by hand. Of course, this is a whole other discussion, and I appreciate that some sleep more soundly with a lot of chain, etc. "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... Pulling the boat using the windlass is a risky business except in the calmest conditions. I know of 2 boats that have destroyed a windlass doing this. FWIW ![]() Doug s/v Callista "Kangaroo" wrote in message ... I currently have 100 feet of 5/16 anchor chain and a Lofrans windlass. I am/was planning on adding an additional 100 feet of chain. I purchased a connecting link that looks like a regular link cut in half. When joined there are 4 pins that get peened over. The reason for adding the additional chain is for setting a second anchor. I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? Thanks and good winds..... Rich |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In light to moderate (10 kts) wind I found I can run the windlass for a few
seconds to straighten the chain (that is, it will assume the mythical catenary shape to the anchor), then the boat will glide forward as the chain assumes its preferred orientation: roughly "L" shaped with a vertical off the bow and the rest on the bottom. I repeat a few times, the bow is over the anchor with minimal stress on the windlass. I agree that using the windlass for maneuvering in anything more than that is asking for trouble - I've usually used the engine when setting two anchors. My real issue with this is that adding 100 feet of chain solely for the purpose of extending the rode to set a Bahamian Moor seems a bit odd. Why not splice in some 9/16 nylon? - even without a rope/chain gypsy, its fairly easy to haul in the rope by hand. Of course, this is a whole other discussion, and I appreciate that some sleep more soundly with a lot of chain, etc. "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... Pulling the boat using the windlass is a risky business except in the calmest conditions. I know of 2 boats that have destroyed a windlass doing this. FWIW ![]() Doug s/v Callista "Kangaroo" wrote in message ... I currently have 100 feet of 5/16 anchor chain and a Lofrans windlass. I am/was planning on adding an additional 100 feet of chain. I purchased a connecting link that looks like a regular link cut in half. When joined there are 4 pins that get peened over. The reason for adding the additional chain is for setting a second anchor. I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? Thanks and good winds..... Rich |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kangaroo" wrote in message ... link would be located. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? I think these links were once called 'LassLinks' (sp?). Nowadays more commonly referred to as connecting links. Several problems with your plan. You are correct that they are rated at the same strength as the equivelent "Proof Coil" chain. The lower grade of anchor chain. I have always had reservations about that claim. Chain loading in the real world of anchoring is seldom under the ideal conditions that load test are performed. I just don't believe they will articulate with the mating links as well as an ordinary link. (just my opinion). If your windlass has a gypsy for 5/16" Proof Coil then the link should work ok, but most are for HT or BBB chain. I'm not sure I understand how you are going to attach this second anchor. It sounds like your attaching it in tandom with, in the middle of the chain. You will have a problem finding a shackle that will pass through any links in the standing part of the chain. And even if you do, you shouldn't do this with the connecting link since it will cause a side pull on the link and open the joint. Or uneven load on the link. -- My opinion and experience. FWIW Steve s/v Good Intentions |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pulling the boat using the windlass is a risky business except in the
calmest conditions. I know of 2 boats that have destroyed a windlass doing this. FWIW ![]() Doug s/v Callista "Kangaroo" wrote in message ... I currently have 100 feet of 5/16 anchor chain and a Lofrans windlass. I am/was planning on adding an additional 100 feet of chain. I purchased a connecting link that looks like a regular link cut in half. When joined there are 4 pins that get peened over. The reason for adding the additional chain is for setting a second anchor. I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? Thanks and good winds..... Rich |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kangaroo wrote in message ... I currently have 100 feet of 5/16 anchor chain and a Lofrans windlass. I am/was planning on adding an additional 100 feet of chain. I purchased a connecting link that looks like a regular link cut in half. When joined there are 4 pins that get peened over. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? I've used 80m (250ft) of chain for 8 yrs on a 10ton 40ft yacht. It's joined in two places by these links. They work fine over the winch (originally a Lofrans, now a Horizon Express 1500w) with no sign of wear compared to the regular links. I re-galvanise the chain every four or five years and there's no sign that the galvanising wears off the rivets first. This chain has been used twice in extreme conditions (2.5m waves, 45kts, 10m anchorage) with no damage to the links, but I do use 20 - 24ft of 20mm diameter nylon snubber line. The galvanised hard eye of this snubber line was elongated on one of these occasions. The reason for adding the additional chain is for setting a second anchor. I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. Having blown one winch by overstressing it, I'd never risk pulling the boat forward on a winch again. I always use engine, and just take in the slack with the winch. I guess that's what you meant anyway! I've never considered carrying spare chain to help dropping a second anchor. Seems expensive and heavy. If I did, I guess I'd add a rope tail. Instead: If I'm mooring for a reversing current (one anchor astern, one forward, both led to the bow) then I drop the big one with more chain than I need, then load the other (it's only got 20ft of chain, then 200ft 18mm nylon) into a dinghy and paddle off down stream and drop it from the dinghy. If I'm mooring with two anchors splayed forward to reduce lateral sheering, then I just motor round the first anchor, helm hard away from it, til I can dump the kedge. Though sometimes I use the dinghy. JimB |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kangaroo wrote in message ... I currently have 100 feet of 5/16 anchor chain and a Lofrans windlass. I am/was planning on adding an additional 100 feet of chain. I purchased a connecting link that looks like a regular link cut in half. When joined there are 4 pins that get peened over. So my questions a Has anyone used one of these links ( they are rated at 1900 lbs ) ? Will it go through my windlass? Are there any problems associated with the connecting links? I've used 80m (250ft) of chain for 8 yrs on a 10ton 40ft yacht. It's joined in two places by these links. They work fine over the winch (originally a Lofrans, now a Horizon Express 1500w) with no sign of wear compared to the regular links. I re-galvanise the chain every four or five years and there's no sign that the galvanising wears off the rivets first. This chain has been used twice in extreme conditions (2.5m waves, 45kts, 10m anchorage) with no damage to the links, but I do use 20 - 24ft of 20mm diameter nylon snubber line. The galvanised hard eye of this snubber line was elongated on one of these occasions. The reason for adding the additional chain is for setting a second anchor. I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. Having blown one winch by overstressing it, I'd never risk pulling the boat forward on a winch again. I always use engine, and just take in the slack with the winch. I guess that's what you meant anyway! I've never considered carrying spare chain to help dropping a second anchor. Seems expensive and heavy. If I did, I guess I'd add a rope tail. Instead: If I'm mooring for a reversing current (one anchor astern, one forward, both led to the bow) then I drop the big one with more chain than I need, then load the other (it's only got 20ft of chain, then 200ft 18mm nylon) into a dinghy and paddle off down stream and drop it from the dinghy. If I'm mooring with two anchors splayed forward to reduce lateral sheering, then I just motor round the first anchor, helm hard away from it, til I can dump the kedge. Though sometimes I use the dinghy. JimB |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kangaroo" wrote in message ... I would back down on the chain drop the second anchor and use the windlass to pull the boat forward. It would be better to use the engine to pull yourself forward as most windlasses state that they are intended to lift an anchor, not drag a boat around. It would be a real pain to burn out the windlass motor at a critical time. If ever the situation arose that I had to ride on more that the first 100 feet, I was planning on shackling on a small piece of chain where the connecting link would be located. I am trying to picture the situation where you decide that you need more than a 100 feet, and then trying to find that special link, get it positioned where you can work on it and then shackle in the extra piece. Let's see, its the middle of the night and a rain squall blows in and your anchor starts to drag. You get up to increase your scope. It's dark and raining, the boat is pitching in the chop. Dang, that one odd link is hard to spot in the dark! All right, there it is, now get it far enough out of the windlass to shackle around it but not so far that it is over the side (don't want to fall overboard!). Let out another 50 feet of chain. Dang, anchor is still dragging, better haul the anchor in and reset. Careful, can't pull the shackle into the windlass! I would think that you would be better off splicing in a length of rope. Rod |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|