"taxpayer" wrote in message
...
You voted for it and you got it. If you didn't vote for George 43, you
probably did vote for one of the senators that is keeping him for
getting the federal courts back to required staffing. The senate has
even prevented judicial nominees that slick Willie proposed from even
getting to a vote.

Illegals get to stay in this country because it costs us a small fortune
in legal fees to get anybody deported, even if the officers just watched
him swim the Rio Grand.


Being rather close to the border action, I would say that the real reason we
have such a large permanent illegal alien population is the pandering of the
political parties (mostly the Democrats, with their concept on
"inclusiveness" to achieve power) to the loud-mouth, seditious Chicano
activists. They promise to deliver the Latin vote, garnering special
privileges and favoritism that's cancerous to our republic. Meanwhile, the
activists encourage non-assimilation into our culture, as this would erode
their own power base. Through all the talk, and double-talk, the Mexican
population of America grows by maybe 1.5M per year. Spanish ballots,
drivers' licenses for illegals, public documents doubled in size to
accommodate a Spanish translation, bilingual education, money for "arts"
programs that celebrate the homicidal psychotics of the Aztec Empire.

If you want to know what the real program is, just think Aztlan, from
Spokane to Denver to New Orleans. Considering the zeal of the immigrative
and reproductive warriors, even that might be too modest. Of course, we
can't say these obvious truths, since anyone pointing this out would
immediately be discredited as a racist, elitist xenophobe.

I keep trying to vote the rascals out, but there appears to be an infinite
supply of rascals.

Ed
(deep in the heart of Aztlan)

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:00:52 -0800, "Ed Price"
wrote:

In re the immigration debate.

It's called "invasion and conquest by immigration" and I'm afraid it's
gone so far there is no hope of liberating ourselves unless, of
course, the French are willing to come over and do for us what we did
for them a few years back. Highly uinlikely since France, with its
own immigration/conquest is rapidly becoming a Muslim-controlled
nation and God knows Islam is not going to do anything for us Infidels
other than dispatch us straight to Hell with not even 20 virgins to
accompany us..

Somebody in this thread said the Democrats are to blame for seeking to
expand their power base by catering to them so that they could be
added to Democratic voter roles. This was probably true in the
beginning but the Republicans are now Hell bent on catching up, viz
George XLII and his pandering to them via "legalization" proposals.

Some mush-brained fool--probably a univ. prof.--said, in a preceding
thread, how wonderful it was that this invasion is allowing us to
incorporate new words into our language. I guess his mind is back in
1066. He probably believes that we, the English-speaking population
of this country, will benefit just as the primitives of the British
Isles benefited from Guillaume's little invasion. Of course,
Guillaume did it honestly at Hastings. He didn't sneak his invaders
across the Channel (substitute Rio Grande) in small groups over
decades. More significantly, William didn't have a band of academic
fifth-columnists undermining his target with drivelings about
"multi-culturalism."

In any case we better all learn to face the east when we pray (after
all, our president said it was "one of the world's great religions"
and we sure as hell better learn Spanish because our culture is bound
to disappear as the invaders show no interest at all in adopting our
language and our culture. The great promise of "multiculturalism"
doesn't really hold out much hope if we only look at the mayhem it is
producing in the rest of the world today. And if only some of these
addle-brained academics who are forming the minds of the next
generation would take a look at the writings of their not-too-distant
predecesors they would see that "multiculturalism" was the principal
cause of the collapse of the Roman Empire. The decline really began
when Rome began to grant its precious "citizenship" to all comers.

Sic transit gloria mundi.

Some pretty heavy stuff in this thread.

You'd never guess that some of it is coming from the descendants
of a group of immigrants who almost wiped out a whole native
population . . .

JimB


nospam wrote in message
...
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:00:52 -0800, "Ed Price"

wrote:

In re the immigration debate.

It's called "invasion and conquest by immigration" and I'm
afraid it's
gone so far there is no hope of liberating ourselves unless, of
course, the French are willing to come over and do for us what
we did
for them a few years back. Highly uinlikely since France, with
its
own immigration/conquest is rapidly becoming a
Muslim-controlled
nation and God knows Islam is not going to do anything for us
Infidels
other than dispatch us straight to Hell with not even 20
virgins to
accompany us..

Somebody in this thread said the Democrats are to blame for
seeking to
expand their power base by catering to them so that they could
be
added to Democratic voter roles. This was probably true in
the
beginning but the Republicans are now Hell bent on catching up,
viz
George XLII and his pandering to them via "legalization"
proposals.

Some mush-brained fool--probably a univ. prof.--said, in a
preceding
thread, how wonderful it was that this invasion is allowing us
to
incorporate new words into our language. I guess his mind is
back in
1066. He probably believes that we, the English-speaking
population
of this country, will benefit just as the primitives of the
British
Isles benefited from Guillaume's little invasion. Of course,
Guillaume did it honestly at Hastings. He didn't sneak his
invaders
across the Channel (substitute Rio Grande) in small groups over
decades. More significantly, William didn't have a band of
academic
fifth-columnists undermining his target with drivelings about
"multi-culturalism."

In any case we better all learn to face the east when we pray
(after
all, our president said it was "one of the world's great
religions"
and we sure as hell better learn Spanish because our culture is
bound
to disappear as the invaders show no interest at all in
adopting our
language and our culture. The great promise of
"multiculturalism"
doesn't really hold out much hope if we only look at the mayhem
it is
producing in the rest of the world today. And if only some of
these
addle-brained academics who are forming the minds of the next
generation would take a look at the writings of their
not-too-distant
predecesors they would see that "multiculturalism" was the
principal
cause of the collapse of the Roman Empire. The decline really
began
when Rome began to grant its precious "citizenship" to all
comers.

Sic transit gloria mundi.

Some pretty heavy stuff in this thread.

You'd never guess that some of it is coming from the descendants
of a group of immigrants who almost wiped out a whole native
population . . .



That, in its time, displaced an even older population in the same hemisphere.

Kennewick Man.

The more we learn, the more amazing the human story becomes. It's why we should
welcome more cultural traditions.............
(but those who bring said traditions should immigrate legally)

Gould 0738 wrote in message
...
Some pretty heavy stuff in this thread.

You'd never guess that some of it is coming from the
descendants
of a group of immigrants who almost wiped out a whole native
population . . .



That, in its time, displaced an even older population in the
same hemisphere.

Kennewick Man.

The more we learn, the more amazing the human story becomes.
It's why we should
welcome more cultural traditions.............
(but those who bring said traditions should immigrate legally)

In spite of the economic pressures 'sucking' them across the
borders? Ah, I forgot, there's no such force as suction!