I saw on GMA this morning that the hunt for Tiatanic was a cover up
for a hunt for the USS Thrasher. It was all a NAVY funded secret
mission with a Titanic cover-up.

Also that Rivet chick was on the Colbert Report. Eye candy compared to
that Roger fellow

Fred

On Jun 2, 9:52*am, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:13:12 -0400, said:

I saw on GMA this morning that the hunt for Tiatanic was a cover up
for a hunt for the USS Thrasher. It was all a NAVY funded secret
mission with a Titanic cover-up.

Also that Rivet chick was on the Colbert Report. Eye candy compared to
that Roger fellow

Fred

There can be no doubt that the search for the Tiatanic was really
cover for a search for the USS Thrasher!

Please, guys. Get the name of the sub right. It was "Thresher," not
"Thrasher." The ship I served on accompanied Thesher during the test dive in
which it was lost. That was about 5 years before I joined the ship.

Sorry for the mis-spelling, but the teachers pet got a good chuckle.

You bubble heads are crazy.

Fred

wrote in message
...
I saw on GMA this morning that the hunt for Tiatanic was a cover up
for a hunt for the USS Thrasher. It was all a NAVY funded secret
mission with a Titanic cover-up.


They're full of ****! Everybody whose got even a wee bit of his memory left
knows full well that the Thresher was lost off of New England in the Gulf
Stream. Why would they be looking for it up by the arctic circle?

http://www3.gendisasters.com/new-ham...-lost-apr-1963

--
Gregory Hall

Gregory Hall wrote:
wrote in message
...
I saw on GMA this morning that the hunt for Tiatanic was a cover up
for a hunt for the USS Thrasher. It was all a NAVY funded secret
mission with a Titanic cover-up.


They're full of ****! Everybody whose got even a wee bit of his memory left
knows full well that the Thresher was lost off of New England in the Gulf
Stream. Why would they be looking for it up by the arctic circle?

http://www3.gendisasters.com/new-ham...-lost-apr-1963

--
Gregory Hall


Because the Titanic was not lost up by the arctic circle.
Final resting place of the Titanic:

* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.

"Keith nuttle" wrote in message
...
Gregory Hall wrote:
wrote in message
...
I saw on GMA this morning that the hunt for Tiatanic was a cover up
for a hunt for the USS Thrasher. It was all a NAVY funded secret
mission with a Titanic cover-up.


They're full of ****! Everybody whose got even a wee bit of his memory
left knows full well that the Thresher was lost off of New England in the
Gulf Stream. Why would they be looking for it up by the arctic circle?

http://www3.gendisasters.com/new-ham...-lost-apr-1963

--
Gregory Hall
Because the Titanic was not lost up by the arctic circle.
Final resting place of the Titanic:

* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.


That just proves my point. 200 miles east of New Hampshire is way too far
from 1000 miles east of Boston. The Navy isn't so stupid that they're gonna
be looking for the Thresher 800 miles east of where it sank.

--
Gregory Hall

"Keith nuttle" wrote in message
...
* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.


http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/...17/extreme_ice

Icebergs drift much further south than I had imagined . . .

--
Gregory Hall

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...


http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/...17/extreme_ice


try: http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/...xtreme_ice.gif

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:13:39 -0400, Keith nuttle
wrote:

Final resting place of the Titanic:

* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.

I would bet the degree symbol is there among the many characters the
box can produce. You push ctl or alt and a number I think. Someone
should know. If you had it, it might not show properly on everyones
box. I think I would have written out deg, and then min and sec to be
consistant. Only twelve more spaces per line. Whatever

Casady

Gregory Hall wrote:
"Keith nuttle" wrote in message
...
* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.


http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/...17/extreme_ice

Icebergs drift much further south than I had imagined . . .

--
Gregory Hall


I believe the captain of the Titanic had a similar problem.

"Richard Casady" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:13:39 -0400, Keith nuttle
wrote:

Final resting place of the Titanic:

* Location: 1,000 miles due east of Boston, Massachusetts, and 375
miles southeast of St. John's, Newfoundland.
* Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41?43'57" N, 49?56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41?43'35" N, 49?56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41?43'32" N, 49?56'49" W.

I would bet the degree symbol is there among the many characters the
box can produce. You push ctl or alt and a number I think. Someone
should know. If you had it, it might not show properly on everyones
box. I think I would have written out deg, and then min and sec to be
consistant. Only twelve more spaces per line. Whatever

Casady


Depth: 12,500 feet.
* Bow Section: 41°43'57" N, 49°56'49" W.
* Stern Section: 41°43'35" N, 49°56'54" W.
* Boilers: 41°43'32" N, 49°56'49" W.


--
Gregory Hall