Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll be running a new rig this year, a Lund Fisherman 1800 with a Mercury
114 4-stroke. I'm curious about whether I should run 87 or 89 octane. My old Yamaha 2-stroke ran much better with 89. On the other hand, I've never noticed a significant difference on 4-stroke motors in my cars. Any input? Thanks, dm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Run what's recommended by Mercury ... and ... a lotta people think the
higher the octane the better the performance ... not true. Higher octane has a higher flashpoint which essentially means it doesn't burn as good as lower octane ... which means it doesn't pre ignite in a higher compression engine. And a lotta car engines have a knock sensor to adjust the timing in the case of preignition. A buddy at work says he buys high octane all the time, big grin on his face ... I said why, we talked ... he says ... hmmm ... think I'll switch to the recommended lower octane ... and save a lotta money. Even my subaru at 10:1 or so compression can accomodate low octane. "Dave Molta" wrote in message ... I'll be running a new rig this year, a Lund Fisherman 1800 with a Mercury 114 4-stroke. I'm curious about whether I should run 87 or 89 octane. My old Yamaha 2-stroke ran much better with 89. On the other hand, I've never noticed a significant difference on 4-stroke motors in my cars. Any input? Thanks, dm |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Run what's recommended by Mercury ... and ... a lotta people think the
higher the octane the better the performance ... not true. Higher octane has a higher flashpoint which essentially means it doesn't burn as good as lower octane ... which means it doesn't pre ignite in a higher compression engine. And a lotta car engines have a knock sensor to adjust the timing in the case of preignition. A buddy at work says he buys high octane all the time, big grin on his face ... I said why, we talked ... he says ... hmmm ... think I'll switch to the recommended lower octane ... and save a lotta money. Even my subaru at 10:1 or so compression can accomodate low octane. "Dave Molta" wrote in message ... I'll be running a new rig this year, a Lund Fisherman 1800 with a Mercury 114 4-stroke. I'm curious about whether I should run 87 or 89 octane. My old Yamaha 2-stroke ran much better with 89. On the other hand, I've never noticed a significant difference on 4-stroke motors in my cars. Any input? Thanks, dm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fuel/oil mixture - 1973 evinrude | General | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General | |||
Why Ficht Failed No 2 (octane, propa speeds, oil dilution) | General | |||
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? | General |