Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These quotes are so good I wanted to include them all (more below)
" wrote: Forgive me for replying to myself, but I wanted to add this from the letters in the February "Yachting World". "A chairman of the Scottish branch of the Institution of Structural Engineers once famously defined engineering as: 'The art of modeling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance.'" cavelamb himself wrote: Aircraft design is 90% educated guesses, worked out to four decimal places. "Roger Long" wrote: Another quote from the infamous Roger Long" "Good engineers understand that the numbers are only a guide to their judgement. Bad engineers believe them absolutely." "Roger Long" wrote: Wow. I wish I had heard that in time to include that in the Titanic programs My quote was, "Any idiot can make things strong enough. Engineering is the science of making them light enough to be affordable and functional in the real world. The designers of that ship were under enormous pressure to use the absolute minimum of steel they could get away with." Engineering is also different from research. Engineers have to figure out how to build something with the available standard practices of the day; or provide a practical & workable innovation to standard practice. It's very easy to say "why didn't you do it like this" (pointing to some exotic & extreme method which may not even be a success at the experimental stage). An official panel of the Society on Naval Architects and Marine Engineers recently sponsored a paper intended, I believe, to show that I was completely wrong so as to preserve their standing as the adults and professionals since I was getting my own TV show, two in fact. They claim that the ship broke from the bottom up instead of the top down. That's possible. Further down you say there is a lot of evidence it didn't happen that way, I'm curious. Wasn't there a RINA paper some years back on the same subject? Until 1985 the expert opinion was that the Titanic didn't break in half at all. I'm also curious if you've ever checked into the newsgroup "alt.history.ocean-liners.titanic" which is a bit slow these days but is still a major rivet-counter hangout. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need scuba tanks; Al, Steel, lo-steel, yada, yada. | Cruising | |||
How well do you know your hulls? | General | |||
Capping old through hulls | Cruising | |||
Through-hulls and Seacocks | Boat Building | |||
HULLS | Cruising |