Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising, rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 4:37 am, "Roger Long" wrote:
.... The required size is a function of the vessel's stability so, if you have a vessel with the stability I hope you have, the tanks will be huge ... Unlike Roger, I'm not a naval architect and I don't have any experience with this. Still, I suppose a boat with low initial stability but with adequate stability at high angles might benefit from smaller tanks. I can imagine a case where a ballasted sailboat has been converted to a pure motor boat where even a few hundred pounds of ballast in anti-roll tanks might make the boat at least as comfortable as it was before the mast was removed. On paper, anti- roll tanks seem like a reasonable alternative for some types of slow speed vessels that require additional stabilization and that are operating in somewhat protected waters. The costs are noise, weight, difficulty of installation, reduced stability and a limited range of effectiveness. There was a good article discussing active and passive stability devices on smaller vessels in Professional Boat Builder in '04. -- Tom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roll Stabilization Tanks | Boat Building | |||
eskimo roll | UK Paddle | |||
Fiberglass Roll | Cruising | |||
Maine Roll-On | Touring | |||
The Roll Over! | Boat Building |