![]() |
|
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
The January 2008 issue of SAIL magazine has an editorial about a forthcoming
Coast Guard mandatory license requirement for Recreational boaters. (nothing to do with the existing license for charters). In addition, the Homeland security bureaucrats are planning some other rules for pleasure craft: http://www.aci-na.org/airports_updat...30.html#313384 Anybody know more about the CG License? |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:12 -0500, Roger Long wrote:
"claus" wrote The January 2008 issue of SAIL magazine has an editorial about a forthcoming Coast Guard mandatory license requirement for Recreational boaters. This is coming just as irresistably as the growth of the Chinese economy. (And no, Tom (whoever), I'm not advocating it.) It has absolutely nothing to do with boating safety. Homeland security... ah yes... but don't you think it rings a little truer when pronounced "Sicherheit der Heimat"? I believe you Americans have the opportunity to throw the fascists out fairly soon yes? |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Roger Long wrote:
"claus" wrote The January 2008 issue of SAIL magazine has an editorial about a forthcoming Coast Guard mandatory license requirement for Recreational boaters. This is coming just as irresistably as the growth of the Chinese economy. (And no, Tom (whoever), I'm not advocating it.) It has absolutely nothing to do with boating safety. Homeland security wants to have a better idea who is on the water and be able to keep certain people off the water so show to the rest of the public that they are being protected. No, it's not terrorists they want to keep off the water, they know the terrorists won't bother to get a license before they drive a boat full of explosives into a tanker or ferry. They also know they can't really stop that kind of event but they need to assure the public that "bad guys" are being kept off the water. So, it doesn't even need to be bad guys. Any guys will do. Did anyone see the 60 minutes show with 14 of the 500 or so people who all had a common and thoroughly American name (something like, "Michael Herbert Smith") who suddenly discovered that they couldn't fly because the name somehow got on the No-Fly list. One of the DHS drones was saying, "Having a few thousand innocent people unable to fly on commercial airliners is a small price to pay for protecting our freedoms." Of course, he didn't say it quite that way but that's what it translates to in normal English. I guess being able to fly for business or personal reasons isn't a freedom. This will decimate the boating industry and be pretty painful to anyone who wants to sell a boat. The industry is so over developed and crowded that just a slowing in growth causes panic and a 10% drop in the number of boating households would be right up there with an asteroid wiping out Florida. How many people do you think would decide to take up some other recreational activity if they needed a license? This will fit very nicely with the DHS real agenda. If you are looking for the needle in a haystack of a terrorist in a pleasure craft, the fewer straws out there, the better. -- Roger Long What if we could get the asteroid to wipe out just Orlando? |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... "claus" wrote The January 2008 issue of SAIL magazine has an editorial about a forthcoming Coast Guard mandatory license requirement for Recreational boaters. This is coming just as irresistably as the growth of the Chinese economy. (And no, Tom (whoever), I'm not advocating it.) It has absolutely nothing to do with boating safety. Homeland security wants to have a better idea who is on the water and be able to keep certain people off the water so show to the rest of the public that they are being protected. No, it's not terrorists they want to keep off the water, they know the terrorists won't bother to get a license before they drive a boat full of explosives into a tanker or ferry. They also know they can't really stop that kind of event but they need to assure the public that "bad guys" are being kept off the water. So, it doesn't even need to be bad guys. Any guys will do. Did anyone see the 60 minutes show with 14 of the 500 or so people who all had a common and thoroughly American name (something like, "Michael Herbert Smith") who suddenly discovered that they couldn't fly because the name somehow got on the No-Fly list. One of the DHS drones was saying, "Having a few thousand innocent people unable to fly on commercial airliners is a small price to pay for protecting our freedoms." Of course, he didn't say it quite that way but that's what it translates to in normal English. I guess being able to fly for business or personal reasons isn't a freedom. This will decimate the boating industry and be pretty painful to anyone who wants to sell a boat. The industry is so over developed and crowded that just a slowing in growth causes panic and a 10% drop in the number of boating households would be right up there with an asteroid wiping out Florida. How many people do you think would decide to take up some other recreational activity if they needed a license? This will fit very nicely with the DHS real agenda. If you are looking for the needle in a haystack of a terrorist in a pleasure craft, the fewer straws out there, the better. -- Roger Long No disputing the rush to id for no reason, but I believe this is for boats entering the US, not ones already here. "subject small planes and boats entering the United States from other countries" is the key phrase. I doubt this will decimate the boating industry in the US. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... There are two entirely separate issues and proposed regulations here. One is inspection requirements and the other is licensing. The first won't have much effect on the boating industry although it will be a pain for international cruisers. The second will have a huge impact. Does anybody have any idea what kind of licensing requirements are planned? I have "googled" the subject in different ways and all I can find is the statement made by Chertoff some months ago. Amazing that there is evidently no leak on this plan.... |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"claus" wrote in message
. .. "Roger Long" wrote in message ... There are two entirely separate issues and proposed regulations here. One is inspection requirements and the other is licensing. The first won't have much effect on the boating industry although it will be a pain for international cruisers. The second will have a huge impact. Does anybody have any idea what kind of licensing requirements are planned? I have "googled" the subject in different ways and all I can find is the statement made by Chertoff some months ago. Amazing that there is evidently no leak on this plan.... Your googling now has the interest of the DHS. Have you looked out the window recently? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote No disputing the rush to id for no reason, but I believe this is for boats entering the US, not ones already here. "subject small planes and boats entering the United States from other countries" is the key phrase. I doubt this will decimate the boating industry in the US. There are two entirely separate issues and proposed regulations here. One is inspection requirements and the other is licensing. The first won't have much effect on the boating industry although it will be a pain for international cruisers. The second will have a huge impact. -- Roger Long I haven't seen the article... Although I'm not enthusiastic about the red-tape and hassle involved for licensing for regular boaters, I'm wondering if it's such a terrible thing. (I should add that I'm likely not affected, since I have a CG license.) One needs a license to operate a motor vehicle, why not a floating vehicle? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:12 -0500, "Roger Long"
wrote: Much snipped This will decimate the boating industry and be pretty painful to anyone who wants to sell a boat. The industry is so over developed and crowded that just a slowing in growth causes panic and a 10% drop in the number of boating households would be right up there with an asteroid wiping out Florida. How many people do you think would decide to take up some other recreational activity if they needed a license? This will fit very nicely with the DHS real agenda. If you are looking for the needle in a haystack of a terrorist in a pleasure craft, the fewer straws out there, the better. I wonder whether you can still enlist in a pilot training course and tell them that you don;t want to be bothered in learning how to land an airplane? In a more sensible mode, can anyone tell me where the HLS got all their trained and experienced personal? From abroad it (HLS) appeared to blossom into being almost over night with agents everywhere. Where did they all come from? Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:12 -0500, "Roger Long" wrote: Much snipped This will decimate the boating industry and be pretty painful to anyone who wants to sell a boat. The industry is so over developed and crowded that just a slowing in growth causes panic and a 10% drop in the number of boating households would be right up there with an asteroid wiping out Florida. How many people do you think would decide to take up some other recreational activity if they needed a license? This will fit very nicely with the DHS real agenda. If you are looking for the needle in a haystack of a terrorist in a pleasure craft, the fewer straws out there, the better. I wonder whether you can still enlist in a pilot training course and tell them that you don;t want to be bothered in learning how to land an airplane? In a more sensible mode, can anyone tell me where the HLS got all their trained and experienced personal? From abroad it (HLS) appeared to blossom into being almost over night with agents everywhere. Where did they all come from? Probably rendintioned from Syria. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"claus" wrote in
: Coast Guard mandatory license requirement for Recreational boaters. The boat builders, who know most boat purchases are spontaneous and would not happen if the boater had to go through training and testing to drive it, have been very successful in seeing this never happens as it's bad for business.....and business is really bad, anyways. Isn't this just another method to bleed campaign funds out of manufacturers in an election year?....(c; Larry -- QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights. How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use! |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Roger Long" wrote in
: This will decimate the boating industry and be pretty painful to anyone who wants to sell a boat. The industry is so over developed and crowded that just a slowing in growth causes panic and a 10% drop in the number of boating households would be right up there with an asteroid wiping out Florida. How many people do you think would decide to take up some other recreational activity if they needed a license? This will fit very nicely with the DHS real agenda. If you are looking for the needle in a haystack of a terrorist in a pleasure craft, the fewer straws out there, the better. Hmm...standing on the dock full of for sale signs....prices plummeting hard on used boats....six pack or coastal master's license in your pocket..... Is there a downside to this if you're not a broker or dealer?? Larry -- QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights. How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use! |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Dec 19, 4:18 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
I haven't seen the article... Although I'm not enthusiastic about the red-tape and hassle involved for licensing for regular boaters, I'm wondering if it's such a terrible thing. (I should add that I'm likely not affected, since I have a CG license.) One needs a license to operate a motor vehicle, why not a floating vehicle? ... The CG wants boaters to be required to have positive ID on them at all times. If your mariners ticket is like mine it is just a bit of paper and pretty useless as an ID so they'd probably make you at least go and get a merchant marine ID card (STCW). As Roger points out the CG is pushing this as a "Homeland Security" measure not a boating safety measure. Test based licensing is a different thing and while I don't see any compelling reason for it there is a strong trend towards it in the states. The group knocked the licensing topic around pretty hard not too long ago and I'm not excited to revisit it. I hate the idea. It seems like an expensive solution looking for a problem. And the short answer to your question seems to me to be that operating motor vehicles on the roads has proven to be very dangerous even with mandatory testing while operating boats even without testing have proven to be pretty safe. -- Tom. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:12 -0500, "Roger Long" wrote: Much snipped In a more sensible mode, can anyone tell me where the HLS got all their trained and experienced personal? From abroad it (HLS) appeared to blossom into being almost over night with agents everywhere. Where did they all come from? Probably illegal immigrants. Have you heard that in UK it has just been found that hundreds, or even thousands, of people working in 'security' jobs were given these jobs without a check first to see if they were legally able to work in UK at all? Some even got jobs in Government Departments,, including at least one in the Home Ofice itself |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
|
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
wrote in message
... On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:23:20 -0500, "Roger Long" wrote: wrote As Roger points out the CG is pushing this as a "Homeland Security" measure not a boating safety measure. Test based licensing is a different thing and while I don't see any compelling reason for it there is a strong trend towards it in the states. Thinking about it more, I don't think this will have a huge impact on the boating industry. The interest groups that would be harmed by test based licensing sufficient to raise the average standard of competence enough to have a measurable impact on accident rates and search and rescue costs are powerful enough that it just isn't going to happen. That would require a course of instruction at least as long and expensive as the rather minimal training standards for aircraft. Even that wouldn't do much. 10 - 15 hour solo flight trainees actually have lower accident rates than 500 hour pilots. 10,000 hour pilots do incredibly boneheaded things and die. State mandated boater safety courses with some kind of certificate that has to be presented to register a boat are coming, however. They will increase the number of people who know the right of way rules enough to make it a little less nerve-wracking to be out on a busy Sunday afternoon and eat into the fiberglass repair business slightly but won't do much else. The fee that the states can collect when the certificate is issued probably has as much to do with these programs as concern about the accident rates. What is inevitable, I'm sure, is a cereal box top style license like the VHF operators license. Nothing scares the people protecting our freedoms more than the public actually being free. They need everyone to have something that can be taken away if they wish to deprive a person of the ability to operate a watercraft legally. This satisfies the governmental instinct for control and political need to reassure the general non-boating populous that the waterways are are not a wild frontier. The fact that you don't need to operate legally to blow something up with a boat is irrelevant. It's all smoke and mirrors, like the obsession with taking away nail clippers on airlines just before the last presidential election. Sigh... As I have pointed out before, this is a non-issue. The USCG changed it's mind about this, and has said so in writing. They like the idea of requiring an ID, but they don't want to get involved in administering a special ID of their own. They just want you to carry your drivers licence or a state issued photo ID. How much more do they want? I carry a retired military ID card, and driver's license both with pictures. Of course, coming back from down island we would add the passport to the pile. Homeland Security is just another boondoggle so full of holes and for us taxpayers to foot the bill. Leanne |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
wrote in message
... On Dec 19, 4:18 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: I haven't seen the article... Although I'm not enthusiastic about the red-tape and hassle involved for licensing for regular boaters, I'm wondering if it's such a terrible thing. (I should add that I'm likely not affected, since I have a CG license.) One needs a license to operate a motor vehicle, why not a floating vehicle? ... The CG wants boaters to be required to have positive ID on them at all times. If your mariners ticket is like mine it is just a bit of paper and pretty useless as an ID so they'd probably make you at least go and get a merchant marine ID card (STCW). As Roger points out the CG is pushing this as a "Homeland Security" measure not a boating safety measure. Test based licensing is a different thing and while I don't see any compelling reason for it there is a strong trend towards it in the states. The group knocked the licensing topic around pretty hard not too long ago and I'm not excited to revisit it. I hate the idea. It seems like an expensive solution looking for a problem. And the short answer to your question seems to me to be that operating motor vehicles on the roads has proven to be very dangerous even with mandatory testing while operating boats even without testing have proven to be pretty safe. -- Tom. I believe it's TWIC, since I don't cross international boarders with my license, but ok. I know you're right. I think it should be a boating safety issue not a HS issue. I think a simple written test wouldn't be all that terrible. Re driver licenses, I haven't had to do a test for that in 25 years (or more)... it's all done by mail unless you have a bunch of tickets. What's wrong with first time boat owners having to take a written test? While boating is much, much safer, I don't see why it would be such a terrible thing. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Edgar" wrote in message
... "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:29:12 -0500, "Roger Long" wrote: Much snipped In a more sensible mode, can anyone tell me where the HLS got all their trained and experienced personal? From abroad it (HLS) appeared to blossom into being almost over night with agents everywhere. Where did they all come from? Probably illegal immigrants. Have you heard that in UK it has just been found that hundreds, or even thousands, of people working in 'security' jobs were given these jobs without a check first to see if they were legally able to work in UK at all? Some even got jobs in Government Departments,, including at least one in the Home Ofice itself And, there was that FBI agent who's relatives were working with Ossama... but who's counting.... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:56:40 -0800, Stephen Trapani wrote:
Nice hit on the first swing by the blindfolded kid though, eh? are you referring to WTC Bldg. 7? |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:56:40 -0800, Stephen Trapani wrote: wrote: On 20 Dec 2007 12:28:03 -0600, Dave wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:08:59 GMT, said: the American Sheeple have turned into a nation of hand-wringing, Oprahcized, worry warts. Nothing to do with Oprah, but worry warts? Witnessing the two towers burn and fall from my office window made a pretty strong impression. And remember, that was the second attempt on the towers. Yes worry warts. The response by the United States has strongly resembled a blindfolded kid, high on amphetamines, wildly swinging at a pinata. So you agree that the threat is valid, you just don't think the response has been very good. No. I think we are chasing our collective tails, and have failed to even identify the threat correctly. The response so far has been a negative as far as solving the problem. Swisssssh! You missed! :') You didn't answer the question for the second time. This is common when someone can't answer an argument. You used the term 'worrywarts' as though there was nothing to worry about. When someone mentioned the WTC, you changed your argument to be about us swinging blindly at the wrong target. When I pointed out that you changed the argument and asked you if you thought the threat was valid, you tried to shift it back again to solving the problem, instead of whether there was a problem to worry about. This sort of behavior on your part basically acknowledges that there is a threat, otherwise you would have an answer for the question instead of trying to change the subject. So you can stop using the term 'worrywart' since you admit there is a real threat to worry about. Unless you'd prefer to try again with the fruitless backpedaling? Nice hit on the first swing by the blindfolded kid though, eh? Stephen We removed Afghanistan as a safe haven. Bullseye. Stephen |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
In article , Larry wrote:
Hmm...standing on the dock full of for sale signs....prices plummeting hard on used boats....six pack or coastal master's license in your pocket..... Is there a downside to this if you're not a broker or dealer?? Larry I'll be in the market for a boat soon. Am very tempted to cross to America (from the UK) to make a purchase... it's just a damn long way between boats I like the look of! ... the savings could cover the internal flights and car-hire though. Justin. -- Justin C, by the sea. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:19:38 -0800, Stephen Trapani wrote: wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:56:40 -0800, Stephen Trapani wrote: wrote: On 20 Dec 2007 12:28:03 -0600, Dave wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:08:59 GMT, said: the American Sheeple have turned into a nation of hand-wringing, Oprahcized, worry warts. Nothing to do with Oprah, but worry warts? Witnessing the two towers burn and fall from my office window made a pretty strong impression. And remember, that was the second attempt on the towers. Yes worry warts. The response by the United States has strongly resembled a blindfolded kid, high on amphetamines, wildly swinging at a pinata. So you agree that the threat is valid, you just don't think the response has been very good. No. I think we are chasing our collective tails, and have failed to even identify the threat correctly. The response so far has been a negative as far as solving the problem. Swisssssh! You missed! :') You didn't answer the question for the second time. This is common when someone can't answer an argument. You used the term 'worrywarts' as though there was nothing to worry about. When someone mentioned the WTC, you changed your argument to be about us swinging blindly at the wrong target. When I pointed out that you changed the argument and asked you if you thought the threat was valid, you tried to shift it back again to solving the problem, instead of whether there was a problem to worry about. This sort of behavior on your part basically acknowledges that there is a threat, otherwise you would have an answer for the question instead of trying to change the subject. So you can stop using the term 'worrywart' since you admit there is a real threat to worry about. Unless you'd prefer to try again with the fruitless backpedaling? Nice hit on the first swing by the blindfolded kid though, eh? Stephen We removed Afghanistan as a safe haven. Bullseye. Stephen Worry warts are people like you who get overwrought over things that don't matter, and ignore things that DO matter. No, they worry about everything, including the things that do matter. There is a threat, but you are doing everything you can think of to avoid facing it. What is this threat, then, that I am avoiding facing? Instead, you create thousands of fantasy fueled false targets (also known as strawmen and red herrings) and attack them, as if you are accomplishing something by doing so. So you are saying that the targets we are going after, Al Qaida and those who would help them are the wrong targets. I'm curious as to who you think the targets should be. Stephen |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Roger Long wrote:
"Stephen Trapani" wrote We removed Afghanistan as a safe haven. Bullseye. We did? I take it you don't read newspapers. Afghanistan was a place they could openly train and safely congregate while they plan our demise. That, of course, has drastically changed. Now all they can do there is hide in holes. They are unable to conduct any operations there, they're lucky to be able to hang on to their lives. No more safe haven. Stephen |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Dec 20, 10:45 pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:31:23 GMT, said: I believe they can then take you "downtown" to see about establishing your identity. You believe wrong. That would be an arrest. An arrest may not be made without probable cause to believe you have committed a crime. You do have to Identifiy yourself if asked, but you don't have to carry ID. brown v. texas At that point, you would be foolish to escalate things by trying to walk away. If you are a holder of a drivers license, you are required by law to show it to any LEO upon request. You agreed to that when you got the license. Be smart, and carry it, Dave. Only if driving [engaging in commerce]. You may have so agreed. I didn't. In some localities they could also charge you with vagrancy if you didn't have some money on you. Those laws were held unconstitutional over 40 years ago. Believe it or not, you can't make it a crime to be penniless. If you have an ID [14th amendment citizenship establishment ID] then you don't have to carry money. Contrarywise, If you have $20 in you pocket [gold OR silver] then you've established yourself as a freeman [as opposed to 14th Amend. Citizen/ slave] and your word is bond [you don't need to carry ID cards]. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
|
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Leanne" wrote in :
Homeland Security is just another boondoggle so full of holes and for us taxpayers to foot the bill. Leanne There is no homeland security. We sailed from hundreds of miles offshore into Charleston Harbor, in broad daylight. Not a single government bureaucrat stopped us to ask if we had any WMDs aboard, not one. When the Russians were the Soviets, I used to work on the ships at Norfolk Naval Base, right next door to the grain loading docks where massive Soviet ships loaded up on US grain to feed their masses, making food in America much more expensive for Americans. One day, I was drinking a cup of the XO's coffee on the bridge deck of a heavy cruiser who needed my attention. XO and I were musing over the harbor and its inhabitants and I said to him, "What's to stop the Russians on that ship from having a 50 megaton hydrogen weapon in a lead- lined shielded compartment in the center of the ship, unbeknownst to her crew hooked to a satellite phone receiver pointed at Moscow? He looked shocked! Stupid asses...Why do we let our ENEMIES plant nuclear weapons right next to the biggest naval base on the Atlantic side of the country? Didn't we learn ANYTHING at Pearl Harbor in '41? Stupid asses...all the ships come in to park together....then they all leave together, about the SAME time as the Soviet grain ships, coincidentally! Well....Duhhh! Larry -- Their not concerned with "Homeland Security" when it wasn't "them" but "US" who blew up 9/11/2001....while the whole US military machine just took the day off to watch? Well....Duhhhh... |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Dave wrote in
: So far as I'm aware there is no requirement to carry identification if you're simply walking along the street. Think Again.....It just hasn't been IMPLEMENTED...yet. http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,12...1/article.html http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...191857,00.html http://www.nonationalid.com/ "The Real ID Act, passed by Congress and signed by President Bush on May 11, 2005, mandates that all U.S. citizens will receive a National ID card by May of 2008." The Real ID Act of 2005....and YOU thought it was about Tsunami Relief, like it said on the front! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act "Legislative history The Real ID Act started off as H.R. 418, which passed the House[1] and went stagnant. Representative James Sensenbrenner (R) of Wisconsin, the author of the original Real ID Act, then attached it as a rider on a military spending bill (H.R. 1268). The House of Representatives passed that spending bill with the Real ID rider 368-58[2], and the Senate passed the joint House-Senate conference report on that bill 100-0.[3]. There was no debate whatsoever on this piece of legislation. President Bush signed it into law on May 11, 2005[4]. On March 2, 2007, it was announced that enforcement of the Act would be postponed for two years[5]. The provisions of the bill will be delayed from going into effect until December 2009." "Please have your RFID chip ready for scanning, Sheeple." Larry -- No Chip? No Driving No Banking No Job No Money No entrance to any govt building No licenses of any kind issued No credit cards, bank cards, financial access No buying anything...house, cars, food, even WalMart a non-person on the run.....like in Blade Runner...open season. Every movement, every action, all tracked. It's good for you! It's not just a good idea....IT'S THE LAW, ALREADY! And noone even mentioned it on TV controlled by "them". We'll execute Sensenbrenner as the “First Republican to hang”. It’s a start..... |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
|
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:YtBaj.5461
: I'm curious as to who you think the targets should be. The Freemasons who attacked us....and took the entire US military machine offline for the day they did it. Hours and hours and not one goddamned jet shot any airliner down.....except Flight 93 in PA because the passengers cellphoned home to tell their families they were about to TAKE BACK THE AIRPLANE and blow the lid off this puppy! Larry -- Hell, many of the “terrorists” on the planes are STILL ALIVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST! |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:kwBaj.5462
: Afghanistan was a place they could openly train and safely congregate while they plan our demise. That, of course, has drastically changed. Now all they can do there is hide in holes. They are unable to conduct any operations there, they're lucky to be able to hang on to their lives. No more safe haven. Stephen How did Middle East Terrorists, Afghan or otherwise, take down WTC bldg 7? Was Allah doing it for them, or was it thermate? How did Middle East Terrorists, Afghan or otherwise, put the whole US military machine inside the USA on STANDDOWN for a whole day while Freemason Cheney was telling some underling, “The order still stands.” How did Middle East Terrorists, who couldn’t fly a Cessna for their flight instructors, fly a fully-loaded airliner around a 270 degree turn and through a 16’ hole in the UNINHABITED part of the Pentagon? If you were flying that mission, wouldn’t you try to fly right into THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF OFFICES on the side of the building YOU WERE ALREADY COMING IN TOWARDS?....killing as many top Freemasons and Generals/Admirals as possible? Bull****.....pure bull****. Larry -- QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "I have been to several major Chinese cities and have seen first hand shops crammed with obviously fake American products." - Jon Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property Rights. How can they be fake? The Chinese make all "American Products" I use! |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On 20 Dec 2007 16:45:05 -0600, Dave wrote:
I believe they can then take you "downtown" to see about establishing your identity. You believe wrong. That would be an arrest. No, that would be a "detention". an arrest may not be made without probable cause to believe you have committed a crime. That's true but you may be "detained" for questioning. Your recourse is to call a lawyer. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Larry wrote:
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:kwBaj.5462 : Afghanistan was a place they could openly train and safely congregate while they plan our demise. That, of course, has drastically changed. Now all they can do there is hide in holes. They are unable to conduct any operations there, they're lucky to be able to hang on to their lives. No more safe haven. Stephen How did Middle East Terrorists, Afghan or otherwise, take down WTC bldg 7? Was Allah doing it for them, or was it thermate? How did Middle East Terrorists, Afghan or otherwise, put the whole US military machine inside the USA on STANDDOWN for a whole day while Freemason Cheney was telling some underling, “The order still stands.” How did Middle East Terrorists, who couldn’t fly a Cessna for their flight instructors, fly a fully-loaded airliner around a 270 degree turn and through a 16’ hole in the UNINHABITED part of the Pentagon? If you were flying that mission, wouldn’t you try to fly right into THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF OFFICES on the side of the building YOU WERE ALREADY COMING IN TOWARDS?....killing as many top Freemasons and Generals/Admirals as possible? Bull****.....pure bull****. Mind control aliens took over and bent everyone to their devilish alien scheme? Stephen |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Larry wrote:
Stephen Trapani wrote in news:YtBaj.5461 : I'm curious as to who you think the targets should be. The Freemasons who attacked us....and took the entire US military machine offline for the day they did it. Hours and hours and not one goddamned jet shot any airliner down.....except Flight 93 in PA because the passengers cellphoned home to tell their families they were about to TAKE BACK THE AIRPLANE and blow the lid off this puppy! Shoot, I was close! Stephen |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
Mind control aliens took over and bent everyone to their devilish alien scheme? Whould you two grow up? Please? |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:59:24 -0600, cavelamb himself
wrote: Mind control aliens took over and bent everyone to their devilish alien scheme? Whould you two grow up? Please? You also noticed that it is past time for this thread to die. Casady |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On 20 Dec 2007 20:22:01 -0600, Dave wrote:
That's true but you may be "detained" for questioning. Your recourse is to call a lawyer. Best stick to fields you know, Wayne. As always I defer to your wise counsel. Please enlighten us as you criticize. I don't have any experience at all with being detained for questioning but it's my understanding that it happens: suspicion of probable cause, person of interest, possible material witness, etc. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
"Justin C" wrote in message ... In article , Larry wrote: Hmm...standing on the dock full of for sale signs....prices plummeting hard on used boats....six pack or coastal master's license in your pocket..... Is there a downside to this if you're not a broker or dealer?? Larry I'll be in the market for a boat soon. Am very tempted to cross to America (from the UK) to make a purchase... it's just a damn long way between boats I like the look of! ... the savings could cover the internal flights and car-hire though. Justin. Why go there? Do it all on line and keep the savings for yourself.. You can download particulars of lots of similar boats and then choose. Get lots of pictures and, when you have decided on one, get an independent survey to make sure she is Ok. .. BUT, do not forget that you will have to get her EU certified so that she comes with EU documentation and a CE mark or the Customs will not release her on arrival in UK. This last requirement is the only real pita in the whole affair, because it is pure unnecessary bureaucracy. Been there, done all that and never set eyes on my beautiful boat until she was unloaded over here. The only requirement is that you have to know enough about the type of boat you are buying and/or its designer and builder to do without personal inspection and sea trial. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On 20 Dec 2007 20:22:01 -0600, Dave wrote:
I believe they can then take you "downtown" to see about establishing your identity. You believe wrong. That would be an arrest. No, that would be a "detention". an arrest may not be made without probable cause to believe you have committed a crime. That's true but you may be "detained" for questioning. Your recourse is to call a lawyer. Best stick to fields you know, Wayne. Here's some advice from people who know: http://www.jkrlaw.com/video/police-detentions.html |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
In article , Edgar wrote:
"Justin C" wrote in message ... In article , Larry wrote: Hmm...standing on the dock full of for sale signs....prices plummeting hard on used boats....six pack or coastal master's license in your pocket..... Is there a downside to this if you're not a broker or dealer?? Larry I'll be in the market for a boat soon. Am very tempted to cross to America (from the UK) to make a purchase... it's just a damn long way between boats I like the look of! ... the savings could cover the internal flights and car-hire though. Justin. Why go there? Do it all on line and keep the savings for yourself.. You can download particulars of lots of similar boats and then choose. Get lots of pictures and, when you have decided on one, get an independent survey to make sure she is Ok. . BUT, do not forget that you will have to get her EU certified so that she comes with EU documentation and a CE mark or the Customs will not release her on arrival in UK. This last requirement is the only real pita in the whole affair, because it is pure unnecessary bureaucracy. Been there, done all that and never set eyes on my beautiful boat until she was unloaded over here. The only requirement is that you have to know enough about the type of boat you are buying and/or its designer and builder to do without personal inspection and sea trial. Couldn't I just sail it back 'under their radar' ? What sort of cost could I expect to get it certified? Any web-sites you can recommend with details of the legislation? Justin. -- Justin C, by the sea. |
Coast Guard Licensing of Recreational Boaters
On 21 Dec 2007 11:29:03 -0600, Dave wrote:
if you don't think you can decline the proffered hospitality, then you've been arrested. If there is any doubt, you should ask. If you are not under arrest you should decline to be detained until you get legal counsel. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com